1 / 18

EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop

EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop. 13/14 January 2009 Rob Davies, Scientific Co-ordinator EuropeanaLocal. Basic facts. Best Practice Network Duration 36 months (2008-11) Budget 4.3 million Euro (80% funded) 1031+ Person-months in total 32 Partners 39 Deliverables

verena
Download Presentation

EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EuropeanaLocal- Europeana Knowledge Sharing Workshop 13/14 January 2009 Rob Davies, Scientific Co-ordinator EuropeanaLocal

  2. Basic facts • Best Practice Network • Duration 36 months (2008-11) • Budget 4.3 million Euro (80% funded) • 1031+ Person-months in total • 32 Partners • 39 Deliverables • 200+ ‘collections’

  3. EuropeanaLocal objectives • Provide local and regionally sourced content for integrated Europeana service • demonstrate the value of local/regionally sourced content • large-scale pilot implementation: 27 countries • estimated 20 million items identified initially by partners • Implement Europeana specifications and tools • OAI-PMH repositories • ‘map’ existing metadata to Europeana Metadata Application Profile (ESE?) • local vocabularies ‘SKOSified’ • Improve interoperability of digital content held by regional and local museums, libraries and archives

  4. Moving things on…. • Support sensible levels of aggregation • national cross-domain portals, digital libraries, cultural portals etc • Make content available to other service providers • Tourism • Education • Family history • Humanities research • Publishing/media industries • … other search engines and services on the web

  5. Variable and changing starting points • Advanced practice among EuropeanaLocal partners in implementing digital libraries, portals, OAI-PMH etc • France, Italy, Norway, Poland, Spain, UK • Limited progress elsewhere • Spectrum from somewhat centralised to very regional/local • Centralised initiatives seldom have full country coverage • Europeana target for national portal aggregations is 14 member states by 2012 • Currently 6 or 7 underway? • Collection level or item level? • EuropeanaLocal: phased approach in the light of reality

  6. Some important local content types • Items and collections of high cultural value (‘treasures’) held at local or regional level • Specific local collections held by libraries, museums and archives, local audio-visual archives • Visual material high in the mix • Public domain ‘cultural’ records held by archives etc. • Promote content contribution from local users/ communities • More digitisation needed for full representation of all localities

  7. Europeana content holders

  8. Regional content co-ordinators • 1 Ministry of Culture (as aggregator of local content) • 2 national libraries (“) • 2 national museums (“) • 3 national cultural agencies (“) • 5 regional cultural authorities • 7 public libraries • 1 local museum • 1 research foundation • 1 regional digital library provider • 4 private sector/NGO

  9. Partner tasks • Establish Europeana-friendly infrastructure • install OAI-PMH-compliant repositories • map and transform their metadata • make vocabularies available • Work towards a sensible level of aggregation in their country • Europeana standards compliance • Encourage more digitisation of local content • identify centres of competence on digitisation • priorities • Work ‘cross domain’ • archives, audio-visual archives, museums

  10. Technical partners • Asplan Viak (Norway) and EEA (Slovakia) • transfer knowledge from Europeana ‘central’ to technical partners • involved with Europeana working groups • Establish effective support to local regional partners • Europe coverage split in two • training workshops • translated guidelines • Individual partner implementation plans • help desk and ‘flying doctor’ • Establish tools scenario • automated metadata conversion tools etc

  11. Workpackages 1 Project management and co-ordination 2 Metadata survey and content analysis 3 Content harvesting and aggregation 4 Implementation of Europeana standards and tools 5 Dissemination and awareness raising 6 Evaluation and progress monitoring

  12. The first six months (June to November) • WP 1 Management, communications structures, briefing. • WP 2 Preparatory and survey work • WP 3 and 4 Preparing for implementation, training, support • Technical primer • WP 5 Website and other dissemination activities • harmonise with Europeana PR, dissemination, marketing • raise visibility (international conferences, national events) • WP 6 Establishing Evaluation Working Group • planning around performance and impact measurements • Discussions with other projects in the Europeana ‘family’ e.g.Athena • optimize complementary activities, sharing, minimising redundancy • who will be responsible for which types of content

  13. Key objectives for Months 7-12 (December to June) • WP 2 Metadata survey and content analysis • survey reports to be finalised and used as a basis for planning. • approach to ‘thematic content’ to be agreed with Europeana and taken into account in implementation planning. • plan and instigate work to establish metadata repositories • WP3 Content harvesting and aggregation • first implementation of central test environment for EuropeanaLocal by EDLF • initial test harvesting undertaken. • guidance on repository software selection provided. • ‘installer’ and other available tools identified and tested.

  14. Months 7-12 continued • WP4 Implementing Europeana standards and tools • technical knowledge exchange between Europeana and EuropeanaLocal completed and updating procedures established • review of available tools completed • technical guidance developed and expanded • online help desk active • first three regional training workshops completed • implementation planning for first12 partners completed • some repositories/aggregations available for test harvesting

  15. ..again • WP5 Dissemination and awareness raising • redesign of website and dissemination plan in co-operation with Europeana • growth of stakeholder database • procedures for new content providers to join agreed with Europeana and other ‘family’ projects • WP6 Evaluation and progress monitoring • performance measurement schemas and data collection instruments in place • e.g. how can repositories help measure

  16. This workshop • EuropeanaLocal will establish simple, efficient and sustainable processes through which local and regional cultural heritage institutions can easily make their content available to Europeana • W4: open, establish, maintain & sustain a two-way synergetic communication channel and implement a workflow between EuropeanaLocal and Europeana with mutual exchange of technical knowledge, best-practices, tools, training and support • These two days and the working relationships established are a key event in ensuring the future effectiveness of EuropeanaLocal in supporting the goals of Europeana

  17. www.europeanalocal.eu rob.davies@mdrpartners com

More Related