1 / 32

Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs. 2012 Tribal Webinar Series Unwinding Transmission Policies February 29, 2012 11:00 am – 12:30 PM. Unwinding Transmission Policies. DOE Tribal Webinar Series February 29, 2012. Mike McElhany Transmission Business Unit

verlee
Download Presentation

Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs 2012 Tribal Webinar Series Unwinding Transmission Policies February 29, 2012 11:00 am – 12:30 PM

  2. Unwinding Transmission Policies DOE Tribal Webinar Series February 29, 2012 Mike McElhany Transmission Business Unit Western Area Power Administration

  3. Unwinding Transmission Policies • Overview of Western • The Players - Alphabet Soup • Policy Sources • Focus on FERC • FERC Authorities • EPAct05 • FERC Policy Formulation • FERC FAQ • Order 1000 – O1k • Questions

  4. Overview of Western

  5. Overview of Western • Markets 10,479 MW from 57 Federal Hydropower Projects owned by BOR , Corps, and IB&WC to preference power entities • 17,100 miles of high-voltage transmission line across 15-states • About 100 tribal customers who receive around 1.2 million megawatt hours per year • Tribes make up 10% of Western’s core power customers

  6. Overview of Western

  7. Transmission Business Unit-TBU • Transmission Footprint • Rocky Mountain Region – WACM BA • Colorado River Storage Project • Loveland Area Projects • Desert Southwest Region – WALC BA • Central Arizona Project • Colorado River Storage Project • Pacific Northwest-Pacific Southwest Intertie Project • Parker Davis Project • Boulder Canyon Project (Non-transmission)

  8. Alphabet Soup – Federal • FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission • NAESB – North American Energy Standards Board • NERC – North American Electric Reliability Corporation • DOE – Department of Energy • DOI – Department of Interior • BLM – Bureau of Land Management • EPA – Environmental Protection Agency • Congressional/Legislative

  9. Alphabet Soup – State/Regional • PUC – Public Utility Commissions • WGA - Western Governors Association • WIEB – Western Interstate Energy Board • WECC – Western Electricity Coordinating Council • TEPPC – Transmission Expansion Planning Policy Committee • RPS – Renewable Portfolio Standards • NARUC – National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

  10. Alphabet Soup – Trade Associations • APPA – American Public Power Association • EEI – Edison Electric Institute • ELCON – Electricity Consumers Research Council • EPSA – Electric Power Supply Association • LPPC – Large Public Power Council • NRECA – National Rural Electric Cooperative Association • TAPS – Transmission Access Policy Study Group

  11. Policy Sources • Legislative actions – EPAct05 • NERC Reliability Standards • Market Driven • Market Power Driven • Power System Disturbances • Indirect sources (BLM, EPA, etc) • State/Regional sources • Local/Consumer sources • Trade Associations

  12. Focus on FERC • FERC’s Mission: Reliable, efficient and sustainable energy for consumers • Assist consumers in obtaining reliable, efficient cost through appropriate regulator and market means. • Fulfilling this mission involves 2 primary goals • Ensure that rates, terms and conditions are just, reasonable and not unduly discriminatory or preferential. • Promote the development of safe, reliable and efficient energy infrastructure that serves the public interest.

  13. FERC Authorities • Department of Energy Organization Act • Electric Consumers Protection Act • Energy Independence and Security Act (2007) • Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) • Energy Policy Act of 1992 • Federal Power Act • Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 • Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978

  14. EPAct05 required FERC to: • issue a final rule implementing the new reliability provisions (NERC) • issue a report to Congress on Transmission System Monitoring (SmartGrid) • exercise its authority under the FPA in a manner that facilitates planning and expansion of transmission facilities (O1k) • establish rules for incentive-based rate treatments for interstate transmission • Issue rules for applications for national transmission corridor permits

  15. EPAct05 allowed FERC to: • require comparable open access to be provided by non-regulated transmission utilities • issue rules to increase transparency in electric and gas markets • prescribe such rules as it determines necessary and appropriate, to prevent manipulation of electric and gas markets.

  16. FERC Policy Formulation • FERC • Petition for Rulemaking • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking • Notice of Final Rulemaking • Rehearing of Rulemaking • Declaratory Orders • NERC • Reliability Standards and Enforcement Activities • NAESB • Standards which lead to a seamless marketplace

  17. FERC FAQ • Who has ultimate authority over FERC? • FERC answers to the U.S. Congress. • Commissioners and senior staff are routinely called to testify before various committees. • FERC’s decisions can be appealed before the federal courts. • Does FERC have jurisdiction over Western? • Western has filed a “Safe Harbor” OATT • Western must be compliant with NERC Reliability Standards, FERC enforcement of violations has not been tested yet.

  18. Order 1000 – O1k - Timeline • Order 888 in 1996: • Requires open access to transmission facilities to address undue discrimination to bring more efficient, lower cost power to the Nation’s electricity consumers • Order 890 in 2007: • Requires Coordinated, open and transparent regional transmission planning processes to address undue discrimination

  19. Order 1000 – O1k - Timeline • Order 1000 in 2011 • Requires transmission planning at the regional level to consider and evaluate possible transmission alternatives and produce a regional transmission plan • Requires the cost of transmission solutions chosen to meet regional transmission needs to be allocated fairly to beneficiaries

  20. Order 1000 – Requirements • Planning Requirements • Cost Allocation Requirements • Nonincumbent Developer Requirements • Compliance

  21. Order 1000 – Planning • Public utility transmission providers are required to participate in a regional transmission planning process that satisfies Order 890 principles and produces a regional transmission plan • Local and regional transmission planning processes must consider transmission needs driven by public policy • Look for more efficient and cost-effective solutions

  22. Order 1000 – Cost Allocation • Regional transmission planning processes must have a regional cost allocation method for a new transmission facility selected in the regional plan for purpose of cost allocation • Neighboring transmission planning regions must have a common interregional cost allocation method for a new interregional transmission facility that the regions select • Participant-funding of new transmission facilities is permitted, but is now allowed as the regional or interregional cost allocation method

  23. Order 1000 – Cost Allocation • Costs allocated “roughly commensurate” with estimated benefits • Those who benefit pay, those who don’t benefit don’t pay • Benefit-to cost thresholds must not exclude projects with significant net benefits • No allocation of cost outside a region unless other region agrees • Cost Allocation methods and identification of beneficiaries must be transparent • Different allocation methods could apply to different types of transmission facilities

  24. Order 1000 – Nonincumbent Developers • Rule promotes competition in regional transmission planning processes to support efficient and cost effective transmission development • Rule requires the development of a not unduly discriminatory regional process for transmission project submission, evaluation, and selection

  25. Order 1000 – Compliance • Each transmission provider is required to make a compliance filing within twelve months of the effective date of the Final Rule (October 2011 - October 2012) • The compliance filing for interregional transmission coordination and interregional cost allocation must be file within eighteen months of the effective date (October 2011 - April 2013)

  26. Order 1000 – Activities • Western is participating in the formation of an O1k compliant planning region • Planning Regions in the Western Interconnect • WestConnect – (Western is participating) • ColumbiaGrid – (Bonneville Power Administration) • NTTG – Northern Tier Transmission Group • CAISO – California ISO

  27. Mike McElhany • TBU Manager • mcelhany@wapa.gov • Links: • www.ferc.gov • www.nerc.com • www.wapa.gov

  28. Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Upcoming Webinars • March 28, 2012 at 11:00 am MST: Understanding the Transmission Queue Process • May 30, 2012 at 11:00 am MST: Today’s Energy Supply – Yesterday’s Grid • July 25, 2012 – Grid Reliability – Impacts to Tribal Renewable Projects • September 26, 2012 - DOE Office of Indian Energy’s START Program Status Updates

  29. Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs Tracy LeBeau Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs  Tracey.Lebeau@Hq.Doe.Gov Lizana Pierce Tribal Energy Program lizana.pierce@go.doe.gov Steve Tromly WAPA Tribal Program Manager tromly@wapa.gov Randy Manion WAPA Renewable Program Manager manion@wapa.gov

More Related