450 likes | 457 Views
This seminar outlines the theoretical aspects of Higgs Boson search, the LEP II Collider and L3 Detector, and various analysis and search strategies used by L3 to search for the Higgs Boson. Conclusions and perspectives are also discussed.
E N D
Higgs Boson Search with L3 at LEP II Steve Muanza, IPN Lyon (France) • Outline • Theoretical Aspects • LEP II Collider and L3 Detector • Search for SM Higgs Boson in L3: • Production Mechanisms and Cross Section • Decay Modes and Final State Topologies • SM Backgrounds • Four jet channel • “Missing Energy” channel • Leptonic channels • L3 Channels Combination • L3 Limit • Combination with other LEP Experiments • Conclusions and Perspectives BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Theoretical Aspects Higgs Mechanism in SM Mass Generation • Gauge Bosons: • Charged Fermions: • Higgs Boson: BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Theoretical Aspects Theoretical Indirect Constraints on Higgs Boson Mass Triviality: of the coupling Vacuum stability: BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Theoretical Aspects Experimental Indirect Constraints on Higgs Boson Mass BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
LEP II Collider Located at CERN (R=4.2 km) 4 Experiments: ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL • LIL: 600 MeV • EPA • PS: 3.5 GeV • SPS: 22 GeV • LEP BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
LEP II Collider Collided e+e- LEP I (1989-1995) LEP II (1996-2000) L3 Integrated Luminosity BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
L3 Detector TEVATRON BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
L3 Detector Particle/Object ID BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Higgs Boson Production Production Mechanisms Signal Cross Section BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Higgs Boson Decays Higgs Boson Branching Fractions Z Boson Branching Fractions B-tagging is crucial BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Higgs Boson Decays Signal Topologies (82%) BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Higgs Boson Decays BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: SM Backgrounds Main Backgrounds BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Search Strategy Loose Preselection (Topology) Tight Preselection Multivariate Selection (NN or Likelihood) Mass Discriminant Final Discriminant Main variable: B-tagging Constrained Kinematic Fits (5C or 4C) Signal Estimator Confidence Levels BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: B-Tagging L3 Implementation • NN combination of: • Non-isolated muon tagging, • Non-isolated electron tagging, • Decay length (high IP tracks), • Explicit 2ndary vertex reco.,… BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Higgs Boson Mass Reconstruction • Use kinematic fits • Aim: Improve the mass resolution • Method: do the HZ kinematic hypothesis • Take advantage of: • Momentum conservation (3C) • Energy conservation (1C) • Mass constraint (1C) BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 4j Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 4j Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 4j Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
L3 Detector BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel Checking the EGAP response BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: 2j+Emiss Channel Checking the EGAP response BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: ¨Lepton¨ Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: ¨Lepton¨ Channel BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Limits Derivation Statistical Estimator BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: L3 Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: L3 Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: Limits Derivation Confidence Levels Systematics uncertainties are accounted for by varying (gaussian distr.) S and B in the MC trials CLs(1-CLB) : measures resp. the incompatibility between the observed events and the S(B) hypothesis (resp. exclusion / discovery CL) Exclusion: CLS= CLS+B / CLB CLS < 5% (S hypothesis excluded at 95% CL) Discovery: 1-CLB < 2.7x10-3 (3s: signal ¨hint¨) 1-CLB < 5.7x10-7 (5s: actual signal discovery) BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: L3 Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: L3 Search Results Systematic Uncertainties LEP DECM=30 MeV Lumi: 1% Analyses Topological cuts: O(1%) B-tagging: 3-5% MC Stat.: 2% (S) 8% (B) Theory Ds/s=O(1%) • Overall systematics: • Signal: 4% • Background: 8-10% • + qq background (populates the high mass region for 4j and 2j+Emiss channels) • Uncertainty on Nexp(background): 6-15% • Uncertainty on Nexp(signal): 3-6% • (Both for mH close or beyond HZ kinematic limit) BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results Most Significant Candidates BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Analyses: LEP Search Results BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Conclusions • L3: No signal observed (despite the interesting candidate) • Limit: • LEP: Interesting excess observed 2.1s • Compatible with a background fluctuation • ¨Compatible¨ with a 115 GeV signal • The case is still open!!! • Limit: BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002
Prospects at TEVATRON Run II BNL Seminar, 2 May 2002