1 / 27

Lattice Formulation of Two Dimensional Topological Field Theory

Lattice Formulation of Two Dimensional Topological Field Theory. Tomohisa Takimi (RIKEN,Japan). K. Ohta, T.T Prog.Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) No2 [hep-lat /0611011] (and more) August 3rd 2007 Lattice 2007 @Regensburg, Deutschland. 1. Introduction.

vian
Download Presentation

Lattice Formulation of Two Dimensional Topological Field Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lattice Formulation of Two Dimensional Topological Field Theory Tomohisa Takimi (RIKEN,Japan) K. Ohta, T.T Prog.Theor. Phys. 117 (2007) No2 [hep-lat /0611011] (and more) August 3rd 2007Lattice 2007 @Regensburg, Deutschland

  2. 1. Introduction Lattice construction of SUSY gauge theory is difficult. SUSY breaking Fine-tuning problem * taking continuum limit Difficult * numerical study

  3. Candidate to solve fine-tuning problem A lattice model of Extended SUSY preserving a partial SUSY : does not include the translation (BRST charge of TFT (topological field theory))

  4. SUSY lattice gauge models with the • CKKU models(Cohen-Kaplan-Katz-Unsal) • 2-dN=(4,4),3-d N=4, 4-d N=4 etc. super Yang-Mills theories • ( JHEP 08 (2003) 024, JHEP 12 (2003) 031, JHEP 09 (2005) 042) • Sugino models • (JHEP 01 (2004) 015, JHEP 03 (2004) 067, JHEP 01 (2005) 016 Phys.Lett. B635 (2006) 218-224） • Geometrical approach • Catterall (JHEP 11 (2004) 006, JHEP 06 (2005) 031) (Relationship between them: T.T (JHEP 07 (2007) 010)) (other studies D’Adda, Kanamori, Kawamoto, Nagata (arXiv 0707:3533,Phys.Lett.B633:645-652,2006),F.Bruckmann, M.de Kok (Phys.Rev.D73:074511,2006)M.Harada, S.Pinsky(Phys.Rev. D71 (2005) 065013 ))

  5. Do they really recover the target continuum theory ?

  6. Perturbative studies CKKU JHEP 08 (2003) 024, JHEP 12 (2003) 031, Sugino JHEP 01 (2004) 015, Onogi, T.T Phys.Rev. D72 (2005) 074504, etc continuum Target continuum theory limit a 0 Lattice All right!

  7. Non-perturbative study S.Catterall JHEP 0704:015,2007.H.Suzuki arXiv:0706.1392 J.Giedt hep-lat/0405021. hep-lat/0312020 etc numerical No sufficient result Analytic investigation by the study of Topological Field Theory

  8. Non-perturbative study For 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU models BRST-cohomology Imply Target continuum theory 2-d N=(4,4) CKKU Lattice Topological fieldtheory Topological fieldtheory Must be realized Forbidden Non-perturbative quantity

  9. 2.1 The target continuum theory (2-d N=(4,4)) (Dijkgraaf and Moore, Commun. Math. Phys. 185 (1997) 411) : gauge field (Set of Fields)

  10. BRST transformation BRST partner sets is set of homogeneous linear function of def ishomogeneous transformation of ( : coefficient) Questions (I) Is BRST transformation homogeneous ? (II) Does change the gauge transformation laws?

  11. Answer for (I) and (II) (II) change the gauge transformation law BRST (I) is not homogeneous : not homogeneous of

  12. 2.2 BRST cohomology in the continuum theory (E.Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 117 (1988) 353) satisfying descent relation Integration of over k-homology cycle BRST-cohomology are BRST cohomology composed by

  13. Due to (II) can be BRST cohomology formally BRST exact not BRST exact ! not gauge invariant BRST exact (gauge invariant quantity) change the gauge transformation law(II)

  14. 3.1 Two dimensional N=(4,4) CKKU action （K.Ohta，T.T (2007)) BRST exact form . Set of Fields

  15. BRST transformation on the lattice BRST partner sets (I)Homogeneous transformation of In continuum theory, (I)Not Homogeneous transformation of

  16. Homogeneous property tangent vector with Number operator as counts the number of fields in closed term including the field of exact form

  17. (II)Gauge symmetry under on the lattice *(II) Gauge transformation laws do not change under BRST transformation

  18. 3.2 BRST cohomology on the lattice theory (K.Ohta, T.T (2007)) BRST cohomology cannot be realized! Only the polynomial of can be BRST cohomology

  19. Essence of the proof of the result closed terms including the fields in must be BRST exact . (I) Homogeneous property of exact form Only polynomial of can be BRST cohomology (II) does not change gauge transformation : gauge invariant : gauge invariant

  20. N=(4,4) CKKU model without mass term would not recover the target theory non-perturbatively BRST cohomology must be composed only by Target theory N=(4,4) CKKU model Topological field theory Topological fieldtheory BRST cohomology are composed by

  21. 5. Summary The topological property (like as BRST cohomology) could be used as a non-perturbative criteria to judge whether supersymmetic lattice theories (which preserve BRST charge) have the desired continuum limit or not.

  22. We apply the criteria to N= (4,4) CKKU model without mass term The target continuum limit would not be realized Implication by an explicit form. Perturbative study did not show it It can be a powerful criteria.

  23. BRST cohomology Topological quantitydefined by the inner product of homology and the cohomology The realization is difficult due to the independence of gauge parameters Vn Vn+i (Singular gauge transformation) Admissibility condition etc. would be needed

  24. What is the continuum limit ? Matrix model without space-time Dynamical lattice spacing by the deconstruction which can fluctuate Lattice spacing infinity 0-form (Polynomial of ) All right * The destruction of lattice structure Non-trivial IR effect soft susy breaking mass term is required * IR effects and the topological quantity Only the consideration of UV artifact not sufficient.

More Related