1 / 16

Update on e μ /e / μ  LFV resonance search

Update on e μ /e / μ  LFV resonance search. SUSY LFV group 06-05-2014. Updates since EB3. fixed a bug on jet selection Correct 2 inconsistency on object selection among different channels (mu isolation and tau overlap removal) Apply suggestions/comments from EB3 and FAR

vianca
Download Presentation

Update on e μ /e / μ  LFV resonance search

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Update on eμ/e/μ LFV resonance search SUSY LFV group 06-05-2014

  2. Updates since EB3 • fixed a bug on jet selection • Correct 2 inconsistency on object selection among different channels (mu isolation and tau overlap removal) • Apply suggestions/comments from EB3 and FAR • note structure and txt • Wjet & QCD further validation & Zμμbkgd check in μ channel • systematics & correlation • Bayesian Vs. Frequentist method for limit extraction • signal theoretical production cross-section calculation All numbers and plots are updated

  3. updates Egamma trigger Muon trigger: barrel Muon trigger: endcap • Note edition • add a part for trigger efficiency (Sec. 2.1) • add a subsection for signal event selection after object selection(Sec. 3.5) • add subsections for signal production cross-section (Sec. 5.2 & 5.3) Trigger efficiency study are from Trigger performance group: [58] Tricoli, A. et al., Single Electron Trigger Performance Plots. ATL-COM-DAQ-2012-146, 20 Jun 2012. [59] Muontrigger performances in 2012 (approved plots for CHEP 2013).

  4. updates • QCD further validation validate QCD shape with SS Vs OS (also ++ Vs. --) Reasonable agreement

  5. updates • Construct a Wjet control region • invert the cut on the angle phi between the leptons: dphi> 2.7 1 <dphi< 2.7 • Missing Et > 30 GeV (enhance W). • Remove opposite sign requirement • Njet< 2 (reduce t‐tbar). • Remove Pt cut (increases statistics). • all other cuts are kept the same as signal event selection • Wjet further charge validation Reasonable agreement

  6. updates It seems most of the Zμμbkgd events in μchannel are kept since a mu is mis-identified as a tau • Zμμbkgd study in μ channel • Good Z peak • truth level object match also tell us the tau is from a mu fake

  7. updates • Systematics for signal search • correlations between different backgrounds • Systematics for signal search • systematics numbers from table 3 &7&9 in supporting note are mean values for Mll>200GeV, which are dominated by low mass region • it’s difficult to calculate systematics in each mass window for high mass region considering the statistics A correction factor from MC Constant number from data CR WW/Ttbar/Singletop/Zll Similar as: y = a0 – b*x x and y are anti-correlated

  8. updates • Systematics for signal search • Construct a control region where signal events are rejected, comparing data Vs. MC and take the difference as systematics • invert the cut on the angle phi between the leptons: dphi> 2.7 1 <dphi< 2.7 • all other cuts are kept the same as signal event selection Put a 20% systematic uncertainty on total background in signal region

  9. updates • Statistical methods test for limit extraction: Bayesian Vs. Frequentist • Bayesian method: the using one for this analysis • Frequentist method: a standard package also used by Zeμ group http://root.cern.ch/root/html/tutorials/roostats/StandardHypoTestInvDemo.C.html The central limit value is almost the same , but frequentist method gives smaller uncertainty bands

  10. updates • signal theoretical production cross-section calculation Z prime K-factor and systematics are from Z’ group Reference:

  11. updates • signal theoretical production cross-section calculation stau neutrino calculated with a NLO generator package Reference:

  12. updates • signal theoretical production cross-section calculation stau neutrino calculated with a NLO generator package • Systematics: • PDF • factorization/renormalization scale • s Reference: SUSY group common definition https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/AtlasProtected/SUSYSignalUncertainties

  13. Need to be discussed ? • How to address the 20% systematics for signal region ? • Systematics bands from Frequentist method ? • mu mis-identified as tau ? • Z’ k-factor: directly use Z’ group’s results?

  14. Back up

More Related