1 / 23

Scheduling Capacity

Scheduling Capacity. Plant Survey Team Visit February 28-March 1, 2013. Classrooms/Labs Fall 2011 Utilization. 110 Classrooms 72 Rooms Weekly Hours = 2,992 Weekly Average = 42 Room Utilization = 104 Weekly Student Station Hours = 100,226

vic
Download Presentation

Scheduling Capacity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scheduling Capacity Plant Survey Team Visit February 28-March 1, 2013

  2. Classrooms/Labs Fall 2011 Utilization • 110 Classrooms • 72 Rooms • Weekly Hours = 2,992 • Weekly Average = 42 • Room Utilization = 104 • Weekly Student Station Hours = 100,226 • Station Util. Std. Room use = 118 • Station Util. Actual Use = 65 • 210 Teaching Labs • 42 Rooms • Weekly Hours = 1,146 • Weekly Average = 27 • Room Utilization = 1,434 • Weekly Student Station Hours = 38,806 • Station Util. Std. Room use = 154 • Station Util. Actual Use = 91

  3. Current TimeslotsMW or WF or TR15 CRNs

  4. Preliminary Conclusion • Limited space • 1st week of Classes • Break-out sessions • Hybrids • Current timeslots • After add/drop • Faculty Meetings • Student Meetings • Maintenance

  5. Projecting Space Needs • Improve current model • Currently using: MW or WF, TR, some S, plus 1x a week classes • Optimized model • MWF, TR • S • Lengthen days • Hybrids • 1st week of classes

  6. Projecting Space Needs Following slides show results based on proposed schedule(s) Following slides show # of CRNs, Ave # of students, and year – 110 Rooms 8:00am-9:50pmMWF & TR16 CRNs 8:00am-9:50pm MWF & TR & S18 CRNs 7:30am-10:20pmMWF & TR & S20 CRNs Without AB9 and With AB9 7:30am-10:20pmMWF or TR Fall 2013-Fall 2017 7:30am-10:20pmMWF or TR or S Fall 2014-Fall 2018 Without AB9 and With AB9

  7. Proposed Timeslots8:00am-9:50pm MWF & TR16 CRNs

  8. Proposed Timeslots8:00am-9:50pm MWF & TR & S18 CRNs

  9. Proposed Timeslots7:30am-10:20pmMWF & TR & S20 CRNs

  10. 110 Rooms Fall 2012 Raw Data Hours: 8:00am-9:15pm MW or WF or TR & some S Information on Proposed Hours Hours: 7:30am-10:20pm MWF or TR or S

  11. Information based on Proposed HoursHours: 7:30am-10:20pmMWF or TR110 RoomsFall

  12. Information based on Proposed HoursHours: 7:30am-10:20pmMWF or TR or S110 RoomsFall

  13. 210 Rooms Fall 2012 Actual Information Hours: 8:00am-9:15pm MW or WF or TR Information on Proposed Hours Hours: 7:30am-10:20pm MWF or TR

  14. Information based on Proposed HoursHours: 7:30am-10:20pmMWF or TR210 RoomsFall

  15. Projecting Space Needs • AB9 • 20 (110) rooms • 4 (25 seats) • 1 (30 seat) • 6 (50 seat) • 1 (70 seat) • 6 (100 seat) • 1 (200 seat) • This is a gain of 1,360 seats • 4 (210 rooms) • 2 (36 seat) • 1 (54 seat) • 1 (72 seat) • This is a gain of 198 seats

  16. Without AB9 With AB9 • 110 Rooms • With current meeting days/times • Average of 38 students in 2014 • 15 CRNs in 201508 • With proposed times, including Saturdays • Average of 38 students in 2014 • 18 CRNs in 2018 • 110 Rooms • With proposed meeting days/times, including Saturdays • Average of 38 students in 2018 • Potential of 20 CRNs

  17. Without AB9 With AB9 • 210 Rooms • With current meeting days/times • Average of 31 students in 2015 • 9 CRNs in 2017 • With proposed times, including Saturdays • Average of 32 students in 2016 • 9 CRNs in 2017 • 210 Rooms • With proposed times, including Saturdays • Average of 32 students in 2017 • 8 CRNs in 2017 • Potential of 11-13 CRNs

  18. Final Conclusion – 110 (does not include unknown increase factors for maintenance and other Academic & University Activities) • With no changes • Average of 38.2 students in 2014 • 15 CRNs in 2015 • With extended times • Average of 38.2 students in 2014 • 18 CRNs in 2018 • With extended times and Saturdays • Average of 38.2 students in 2014 • 18 CRNs in 2018 • With extended times and AB9 • Average of 37.7 students in 2018 • 14 CRNs in 2018 • With extended times, including Saturdays • Average of 37.7 students in 2018 • 14 CRNs in 2018 • Potentially to reach 20 CRNs With extending our meeting days/times and incorporating AB9, we could accommodate student growth for at least five more years.

  19. Final Conclusion – 210 (does not include unknown increase factors for maintenance and other Academic & University Activities) • With no changes • Average of 30.7 students in 2015 • 9 CRNs in 2017 • With extended times • Average of 30.7 students in 2015 • 9 CRNs in 2018 • With extended times and AB9 • Average of 31.5 students in 2017 • 8 CRNs in 2018 • With extended times and AB9, including Saturdays • Average of 31.5 students in 2017 • 8 CRNs in 2018 • Potential to reach 11-13 CRNs With extending our meeting days/times and incorporating AB9, we could accommodate student growth for at least five more years.

  20. Final Conclusion • Increase space utilization • Break-out sessions • Different location • Hybrids • Effectively share rooms • Off-campus • Non-traditional space • Saturdays • Current timeslots • Meeting times extended –additional Saturday sections • Gain from current average of 13 to 18-20 CRNs in 110 rooms • Gain from current average of 7 to 10-13 CRNs in 210 rooms • After add/drop • Faculty Meetings • Student Meetings • Maintenance • Find alternate meeting location to allow an additional increase in the # of CRNs we could offer in each room

More Related