1 / 39

Activation: Learning from International Experiences

Activation: Learning from International Experiences. Regina Konle-Seidl Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg. RECWOWE Executive Seminar Lausanne, 23 October 2008. The volume. Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Policies in Europe and the US

vicki
Download Presentation

Activation: Learning from International Experiences

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Activation: Learning from International Experiences Regina Konle-SeidlInstitute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg RECWOWE Executive Seminar Lausanne, 23 October 2008

  2. The volume • Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Policies in Europe and the US • IAB, IZA and MPI for Foreign and International Social Law) • Country reports from DE, FR, NL, CH, DK, SE, UK and US

  3. Activation principles • Activation means reviving or redefining basic principles of the welfare state • Often awakening dormant constitutional elements such as self-sufficiency, responsibility, rights and duties (e.g. Denmark, Switzerland, but also in Germany…) • Activation of persons (demanding and enabling/ Fördern und Fordern) • .. and benefit systems • Activation is about limiting the realm of accepted benefit receipt of working-age people (valid reasons for exemptions are defined more restrictively)

  4. Activation objectives • Strategy to combat poverty and social exclusion • Employment as the best way out of poverty • Strategy to overcome unemployment and inactivity traps in full blow welfare states • Focus differs from country to country: Lowering LTU (D), less dependency on welfare (USA), mobilising the non-employed (UK, NL, DK, CH)

  5. Net replacement rates in the 60th month of benefit receipt1 2005 1100% of AW level; after tax and including unemployment benefits, social assistance, family and housing benefits Source: OECD Benefits and Wages 2007

  6. Net income gains: Transition from unemployment into full-time workin %, 2005

  7. From active LM policies to activationstrategies • Activation is about strengthening the link between benefit receipt and job search requirements • Mutual obligations • From passive to active LMP → effective LMP→ activating LMP • Need to take account of the interactions between ALMP and benefit systems (e.g. carousel effect)

  8. Client Segmentation Mandatory work activities job search assistance Able 3 1 Willing Unwilling 4 Training through work activities 2 Mandatory work activities training Unable

  9. Broadening the focus of activation • differences between sequential and „big bang“ activation: risk of shifting beneficiaries to less activated schemes vs. increase in open unemployment/labour supply • In any case: integration of more vulnerable groups generates need for further adjustment of activation policies taking distance to the labour market into account

  10. UK: Sequential Activation

  11. inability to work social assistance 2004: UA: unemployment assistance2005: UB II 2004: UB 2005: UB I D: Broadening the target group of activation Transfer recipients in % of working age population

  12. Broadening the focus of activation • Often in a stepwise manner – gradual tightening of availability criteria/monitoring/mandatory participation over time and with duration of benefit receipt • Over time: considerable (but not complete) convergence in terms of a broader range of target groups • From registered unemployed to jobless/inactive in a wider sense – the typical sequence (most explicit in the UK, DK, NL): • Young unemployed • Unemployment insurance benefit recipients • Welfare recipients • Older workers • Sickness / disability / incapacity benefit recipients (last remaining escape route, often „sacred cows“) • Sequences vary across countries, but converge

  13. Labour market-oriented activation

  14. Repertoire of instruments • Mix varies across countries but typically consists of • monitoring individual job search behavior • enforcement of work tests (incl. mandatory participation in ALMP schemes) • referral to vacant jobs • individual action plans and regular follow-up • personalized case-management assistance for LTU

  15. Repertoire of instruments • In countries with full-blown systems of unemployment protection and active labour market policies activation means also • making benefit receipt less attractive (cut of UE benefit duration) • less emphasis on training, more on work-first (e.g. DK, NL, DE) • Activation is often combined with increasing labour market flexibility (labour demand) via partial deregulation, heavy subsidization and in-work benefits (e.g. UK, US, Germany, France) to stimulate (low-wage) job creation

  16. Repertoire of instruments • In countries with less generous unemployment support and low levels of ALMP (USA, UK) regular interventions in the unemployment spell are • often supplemented by stronger „ make work pay“ policies (in-work benefits, e.g. UK, US) • and intensive employment assistance after a particular duration of unemployment (e.g. New Deal programs for selected targeted groups in UK)

  17. Major findings: Contingent convergence • National policy-making is a learning system, hence activation policies are „moving targets“ • General trend towards widening the scope of activation: from unemployment benefits to welfare and disability benefits 2. Modifying the repertoire of instruments: all countries basically rely on the same set of demanding and enabling instruments in a „work-first framework“ now – but with varying importance…

  18. Contingent convergence of strategies • Activation as a „cascade“ of measures – the longer the benefit receipt, the more restrictive the programs • Strict „work-first“ models tend to become more „enabling“, „human capital“ models more „demanding“ • activation supplemented by search for more effective governance (one-stop shops, external providers + objectives, budgetary incentives) • National policies become more similar over time, but not identical, i.e. „contingent convergence“ • There is need to question established typologies

  19. Contingent Convergence: Driving forces • Normative reframing: passive benefit less tolerated than in the past • Fiscal pressure: more and more benefit systems to be activated / activation of selected benefit regime increases pressure on other benefit regimes • Some learning from policy failure and evaluation • EU and OECD discourse and exchange

  20. Does activation really work? • Effective activation strategies have several effects on participants • “motivation or threat effect”: people exit benefits to participate on ALMPs, work or inactivity • raise effective labour supply, leading to higher employment • Outcomes generally defined in terms of post-programme gains in employment (and earnings) • Descriptive findings • decline of welfare caseloads (USA, NL) • reduction of open unemployment (DK, UK) • larger impact of activation strategies than traditional ALMPs alone

  21. NL: Work first and exit- to-work rates 8 18 32

  22. Denmark: Timing of activation and exit from unemployment

  23. Does activation really work? • Findings from the evaluation literature • Empirical evidence on demanding interventions (benefit cuts, sanctions) seems to be more robust than evaluation findings on enabling policies (e.g. public training programmes) • Recent findings on outcomes of different ALMPs in line with OECD wisdom (Martin & Grubb 2001) • Ex.: job search Assistance and counselling works best when combined with increased monitoring of job seekers (carrot and sticks) • Quite robust evidence that activation policies lower benefit duration and further exit from ‚activated‘ benefits schemes

  24. Caveats of activation: non-sustainable labour market integration • but this may not be sustainable in the long run • especially for people with a long distance to the labour market • risk of repeated benefit receipt due to skills and general employability deficits (see e.g. UK and US experience after one decade of welfare-to work) • activated job searchers often enter low-wage jobs, part-time or other types of „atypical“ work • not all do achieve sustainable employment and independence from public (in-work) benefits

  25. Knowledge gaps …. • Comparative analysis of actual implementation is largely a black box so far • As well as comparable data on structure and mobility of working-age benefit recipients: between different benefit systems and between benefits and work • Empirical work on policies to improve sustainability of jobs and upward mobility (just training?) • Is work-first activation really a stepping stone towards inclusion?

  26. Findings on macro-level outcomes • Outcomes in terms of employment and inactivity levels, impact on the public budgets • net overall effects of activation may be smaller than expected • effects on employment level and composition of employment (low wage sector, non-standard forms of employment etc.) and overall wage structure is mainly a black box • indirect effects (signaling effects) on employed people are difficult to measure • impacts on productivity levels (OECD 2007) • and the budget (cost–benefit): high in some countries (e.g. DK)

  27. Denmark: • ß

  28. Public expenditures in LMP, 2005 OECD 2007

  29. Conclusions - 1- • Inherent trend towards activation of more and more benefit schemes • Activation strategies have larger impacts for beneficiary population than traditional ALMP • Countries are learning from each other • Picture of what works, why and for whom is getting clearer on the individual level • But which strategies work best in terms of employment levels and job quality (stability, earnings) depends a lot on the national framework • Indications that the broader the definition of target groups, the more heterogeneous the labor force, the more integration into instable, low-paid jobs

  30. Conclusions - 2- Work first activation 1. shows positive results in the short run, esp. for the job ready 2. does not mean budget savings – at least in the short run • Integration into (full time) employment is not the only but indeed the best way to combat poverty and social exclusion But beyond the perspective of fast LM integration ► retention programs and “job entry assistance” (e.g. certification of on-the job training) are needed ► to overcome “activation and low wage traps” work first strategies has to be complemented by 1. better transition into stable jobs 2. individual chances of upward mobility

  31. Conclusions - 3- What policies can help raise employability at the lower end? • Stronger „supply side equality“ in terms of basic qualifications and life-long learning (“prevention first”) • Adult training policies not only as part of LM activation policies (e.g. Knowledge lift program in Sweden) • Rather than heavy long-term subsidization of jobs or direct public job creation for the hard-to-place

  32. Back up

  33. Germany: Active and passive benefit schemes

  34. Germany

  35. Recipients of benefits- % of working-age population, 2004

  36. United Kingdom

  37. Activation strategies: Work first vs human capital development

  38. Wages accepted after unemployment spells Germany

More Related