140 likes | 249 Views
Lessons learnt on scaling-up multiple-use water services. Barbara van Koppen International Water Management Institute. Lessons from the Learning Alliances of the ‘MUS project’ of the Challenge Program Water and Food. 4. 5. 3. 1. 2. Mekong (Thailand). Nile (Ethiopia). Andes (Colombia
E N D
Lessons learnt on scaling-up multiple-use water services Barbara van Koppen International Water Management Institute
Lessons from the Learning Alliances of the ‘MUS project’of the Challenge Program Water and Food 4 5 3 1 2 Mekong (Thailand) Nile (Ethiopia) Andes (Colombia & Bolivia) 3 1 5 Indus-Ganges (India & Nepal) Limpopo (Zimbabwe & South Africa) 4 2
This presentation Project focus on • Homestead-scale MUS • Community-scale MUS Scaling-up by five water stakeholder groups • Water users, CBOs, and local private service providers • NGOs • Domestic sector • Productive sector • Local government
Homestead-scale MUS50-100 lpcd; 5 lpcd safe‘most MDG per drop’ resilient food and income…. health labour saving, gender ..from crops ..from enterprise ..from livestock ..from fish
Community-scale MUS Multiple sources, shared infrastructure, re-use People’s participation for livelihoods and sustainability
1. Water users, CBOs • Own investments and innovations for self-supply and local management have always been for MUS • Seeking to integrate fragmented professional support Farmer Wisdom Network N.E. Thailand Water for Food Movement South Africa Communal self-supply in peri-urban Cochabamba, Bolivia
2. NGOs • MUS increasingly obvious for livelihoods goals • Technological innovation homestead-&community-scale MUS • Institutionalizing MUS in government for sustainability and upscaling IDE, Nepal Mvuramanzi, Zimbabwe CRS, Adi Daero basin, Ethiopia
3. Domestic sector • Targeting everybody, including the poor, and homesteads • Single-use expertise on health • Expertise on engineering and management for small-scale uses • Claiming unplanned livelihood benefits • Recognizing higher design norms for anticipated expansion • Future planning for higher service levels, with 5 lpcd safe • Moving up from ‘add-ons’ to community-scale MUS IDE, Jalswarajya/Aple Pani Maharashtra Cinara, PAAR, Colombia
4. Productive sector • Expertise on productive end-uses at fields and direct access (crops, soils, markets, livestock, fisheries) • Expertise on engineering and management for larger-scale uses and water resources management • Recognizing the homestead as a site of pro-poor and gender-equitable productive water uses, besides domestic uses • Moving from ‘irrigation add-ons’ to community-scale MUS
5. Local government • Permanent democratic interface to match communities’ needs with fragmented support • Developing implementation capacity for iterative community-scale MUS (e.g. SADC seven steps approach) AWARD, South Africa, integrating MUS in municipal Integrated Development Plans
In sum Opportunities for Scaling-up MUS Water users, CBOs and NGOs: • Community-scale MUS for livelihoods • Homestead-scale MUS a likely priority Domestic and productive sectors: • Merging resources and expertise on engineering and management across sites and scales; • Providing single-use expertise according to people’s priorities Local government: the coordinator
Thank you for your attention All outputs at www.musproject.net www.musgroup.net