1 / 40

Historical Review

Historical Review. 1995 – Heath Commission established by E Cape government – headed by former Judge Heath 1996 – became a national body ito SIU Act 74/1996 1997 – first SIU set up by Proc R24 2001 – 1 August: New SIU set up by Proc

vidar
Download Presentation

Historical Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Historical Review • 1995 – Heath Commission established by E Cape government – headed by former Judge Heath • 1996 – became a national body ito SIU Act 74/1996 • 1997 – first SIU set up by Proc R24 • 2001 – 1 August: New SIU set up by Proc R118 - Head Willie Hofmeyr

  2. Historical Review (cont.) • Vision • To be a world class anti-corruption agency • Mission • An anti-corruption agency that performs high quality investigations of corruption and takes legal action to prevent and recover losses of state assets in the public interest

  3. About the SIU • SIU is a Schedule 3A Public Entity • Established by the President and reports to him and Parliament • Employs a multi-disciplinary approach • Investigations aim to establish whether civil liability exists • SIU refers any criminal conduct uncovered by investigations to prosecution authority

  4. SIU mandate & legal scope • Main purpose of SIU is to investigate corruption and serious maladministration in connection with the administration of state institutions, state assets and public money • Has limited mandate to investigate private sector conduct “which may seriously harm the interests of the public” • Cases are referred to the SIU by the President by proclamation

  5. Adopting a civil law approach • SIU only institution that uses normal civil law to recover money (AFU has a special law) • Can investigate criminal matter and institute civil proceedings at same time • Corruption does not always amount to criminal conduct • In civil law only need to prove case on balance of probabilities • In civil law a negligent or even innocent misrepresentation is sufficient

  6. Adopting a civil law approach (cont.) • Can still take profit out of crime even if cannot prove corruption or fraud • SIU mandate differs from other agencies such as SAPS & DSO • In multi-agency task teams SIU complements other agencies’ functions- DSO, SAPS, AFU

  7. Delivering an effective and efficient service • SIU has skilled and experienced forensic auditors, commercial investigators, financial analysts, former prosecutors, attorneys and advocates • Provides forensic investigation services at no additional cost to departments • Able to do complete investigation and civil recovery, and assist in criminal prosecution or disciplinary inquiry

  8. Delivering an effective and efficient service (cont.) • Private investigations generate a report referred to SAPS to obtain proper evidence, leading to delays • Can match almost all private sector services at about half the cost • SIU assistance with the investigation and prosecution of the criminal matter can assist with the resource constraints in the criminal justice system

  9. Partnerships • A major innovation has been to work together with departments that have identified major maladministration or corruption problems • They have agreed to pay for the investigation – enables us to put dedicated resources at their disposal • Eg Correctional Services after Jali Commission • Justice – after AG reports • This has a number of advantages for those departments

  10. Partnerships (cont) • The costs are less than half of private sector • Effective forensic investigations that produce court ready dockets • Recover losses and secure savings through civil litigation • Assist with disciplinary inquiries • Assist with prosecutions • Provide ongoing advice to ensure systemic improvements • The objectivity of the investigation • Also smaller projects with: DoT (Limpopo), Housing (KZN and national) • Far advanced with NDoT, ECP Municipalities

  11. Report on progress of SIU 10-point plan • SIU commenced with 10 point strategy in 2002 to put the SIU “back in business” as one of the premier corruption fighting institutions in our country • Significant progress has been made in implementing this strategy

  12. 1.  Creating certainty about the future of the SIU • Uncertainty no longer affecting staff morale • In past two years, very few resignations • Many members who previously resigned due to uncertainty returned to Unit • Still a need to address long term certainty

  13. 2. New cases for SIU • Demand for SIU services greater than ever • In fact, more than we can cope – may have to turn away some unless able to pay • 18 ongoing investigations • Finalised 10 matters through closure or referral for prosecution or other action • Initiated 6 new investigations

  14. 3. Growing capacity to fight corruption • Staff increased by 57% (121 to 190) • Mainly because of significant additional funding from departments – now nearly 31% of budget • Staff may increase by 60% this year to about 300 • Received 35% increase in budget this year • And further funding from departments • Recruited auditors, financial analysts, attorneys, former prosecutors, experienced investigators

  15. 3. Growing capacity to fight corruption (cont) • Training department established, and donor assistance • Start own trainee investigators programme – to improve capacity and representivity • Also a proper Performance Development Programme, and Potential Leadership Programme • Established an Internal Integrity Division to ensure highest level internal integrity

  16. 4. Improving representivity • SUI has an employment equity plan and employment equity forum • Major focus in recruitment to improve representivity, especially at a management level • 80% (47 of 59)of new staff from designated groups • 67% of all permanent staff are from designated groups • 43% are black - 48% incl contract workers • Managers – only 1 black, 1 woman in 2001 • Now: 9 designated groups, 8 black, 3 women

  17. 5. Ensure competitive salaries • New salary grading implemented to align salaries with the public and private sector  • Entire process completed and all staff on placed on correct levels • Enabled SIU to have proper career paths and retain present staff • Have been able to attract good quality applicants

  18. 6. Promoting greater efficiency • Developed pro-active project approach ensure greater impact and faster outcomes • Improved project management approach towards outcomes based results • Identify premier projects where potential impact is greatest • Introducing time sheets

  19. Legal changes to improveeffectiveness • Effectiveness of SIU severely affected by a number of judgments re ability to litigate • Present referral processes re proclamations are ineffective and cumbersome • SIU propose amendments to clauses relating to litigation and power to authorise investigations internally • SIU obtained opinion from senior counsel on the amendments, and related constitutional issues • Urgent amendments to Parliament second half of year

  20. Establishing nationalpresence • Previously SIU based in East London with teams for each province and a satellite office in Umtata • Decided that it would be more effective to establish a national presence • Pretoria office now fully established • Head office move to Pretoria end 2004 • Durban office experienced significant growth • Satellite offices in Nelspruit and Cape Town established • These offices beginning to generate work in their regions

  21. Improved cooperation withlaw enforcement • SIU enjoy good relations with number of law enforcement agencies and government institutions: SAPS, DSO, NPA, OAG, PSC • In process of finalising MoUs with these agencies • SIU involved in multi-agency task teams with a number of other agencies wherein each agency complement powers others, eg. DCS, JACT • Due to resource constraints in the criminal justice system, SIU provide capacity deal with prosecution, criminal investigations, etc. • Integrated project management approach result in recognition of each agency’s contribution

  22. Employment Equity

  23. 10. Building partnerships with government • Important to collaborate with government to fight corruption effectively • Dealt with partnerships earlier

  24. Investigations • Developed a clear focus for investigations based on environment scan, internal case audits, review of SCOPA and AG reports • Investigations focus on national, provincial and local departments and some parastatals • SIU focus informed by its strong forensic investigative capacity maladministration identified in some government departments

  25. SIU investigative capacity • SIU provides full investigation of corruption cases • Members can take proper affidavits • Powers of search and seizure • Power to interrogate witnesses and suspects under oath similar to DSO • Witnesses have to answer self incriminating questions • Strong forensic investigative capacity • Can ensure civil, criminal or internal disciplinary outcome • Completed investigations resulting in court ready cases, civilly or criminally • An operative Special Tribunal will ensure speedy litigation proceedings unlike delays in ordinary civil courts

  26. 1. Profiling: DCS • Emanate from DCS after Jali commission • DCS funding half the cost of a team of 25 • Recovered R17 million from 6 doctors • Secured savings of R370 million re medical aid – prev year R122 million • 113 matters referred for further criminal investigation and prosecution • Incl Prov Commissioner Eastern Cape • 39 internal departmental hearings

  27. 1. Profiling: DCS (cont.) • Investigating prisoner-warder allegations through prison visits • National procurement processes • First Auto petrol & maintenance card abuse • Assaults, drugs • Booking prisoners out unlawfully • Selling of jobs • Promotions and appointments – nepotism • False qualifications • Irregular parole, remission

  28. 2. Profiling: DoJ • Focus on maladministration and possible corruption at 40 magistrates’ courts: • Main focus – Estates, maintenance, overtime and fines • Secondary – Bail, leave, S&T, etc • Work in terms of comprehensive audit-based generic work-plan • Completed investigations at 8 Magistrates Courts • Additional 4 courts are nearing completion • Ongoing investigation at 9 courts

  29. 2. Profiling: DoJ (cont.) • Recovered R258 660 from DoJ officials • Calculated the total potential loss to DoJ at R19 million • 49 criminal cases being investigated against DoJ officials • And 54 disciplinary cases

  30. 3. Profiling: DoT (Limpopo) • Focus on unlawful issuing and selling of licenses, and irregular registration of vehicles • Investigating all drivers’ licences issued since 1994 • Examined 13 centres thus far • Found another 5 000 licences issued irregularly • Another 1 400 physically cancelled • Concluded 41 disciplinary hearings, 22 dismissals • National DoT working with SIU to extend investigation nationally

  31. 4. Profiling: WPP (KZN) • Serious financial irregularities at KZN Witness Protection Program prior to takeover by NPA • Worked with new Director to investigate • Rentals from family and friends of staff members • Safe house rentals inflated • Paid rent for houses that do not exist • Mismanagement of resources / lack of controls • Improper handling of witnesses • Criminal charges against 2 previous employees and 6 estate agents for fraud committed to value of R4.3 m thus far – bail R 1 million

  32. 5. Profiling: DoH KZN • Massive investigations of all state subsidies granted in Gauteng, KZN and N Cape • Identify several attorneys involved in fictitious subsidy claim schemes with housing money • Fraud amounting to more than R20 million • R3.4 million returned to government • SIU pursuing claim against fidelity fund iro bankrupt attorneys

  33. 6. Profiling: JACT • Joint Anti Corruption Task Team in Eastern Cape – with SAPS, Scorpions, AFU, AG • SIU instrumental in setting up infrastructure • Several SIU members seconded to work full-time on JACT • JACT has a caseload of 340 cases • Investigations ongoing at various departments, which include essential service providing departments such as Health, Education, Public Works and Welfare • In the past year JACT has made 96 arrests

  34. Return on Investment

  35. Verification report detail

  36. Other areas of impact

  37. Budget

  38. Administration • Spent R11.9m more • Proud that overheads only increased by R1.8m – 15% of increased spending • Cut expenses to the bone – to extent of staff sharing rooms when travelling • Excellent administration and financial controls • Fully PFMA compliant • Good use of information technology • Serious about training – eg CBT • Filled 59 new positions – received 9140 applications

  39. Conclusion • SIU very successful year • Made massive savings of R374 million • Made big impact in systemic improvements in key departments • Partnership collaborations – contribute to successful SIU profile • Good return on government investment demonstrates any increase will be effectively used • Negotiate legal hurdles through legislative amendments

More Related