Download
1 / 38
380 likes | 592 Views
Nutrient Management Chapter 16. Increase, of course. Slower velocity increases deposition. More organic matter in soil increases adsorption and the soil environment is likely richer in microbes, increasing degradation rate.
E N D
Nutrient Management Chapter 16
Increase, of course. Slower velocity increases deposition. More organic matter in soil increases adsorption and the soil environment is likely richer in microbes, increasing degradation rate.
Clear cut operation without SMZ Clear cut operation with SMZ
Common sense guidelines on width of buffer strip needed to be effective.
These provide better cover of the soil than just what- ever weeds emerge. Thus, there is less effect of rain- drop impact on soil detachment and slower runoff velocity means more time for infiltration. Since the crop uptakes soluble N (e.g., NO3-), there is less leaching and if a legume, there is net input of N into the soil so less need for subsequent fertilization. Planted cover crops produce more biomass than native weeds so add more organic matter.
Reduce. This is a matter of coverage of the soil. The more, the better with respect to runoff and erosion.
This study indicated that increasing the time spent in legume both increased corn yields and diminished the benefit / need for N fertilization. The treatments were continuous corn, C-C-C, rotation with soybeans, and a longer term rotation involving meadow, presumably with clover or grass-clover mix.
There are, you know, organic fertilizers that are chemically synthesized.
Common problem is that P / N ratio is larger than the crop needs so long-term use of such fertilizer materials leads to build-up of P in the soil and, therefore, increased potential for P loss to downstream water bodies and their eutrophication.
A lot of the stuff but not much acreage for its beneficial use as a fertilizer.
So funky barrel to left is P-limited. Fix that and wind up with funky N-limited barrel.
Soil testing and plant analysis address the first two nutrient management questions. To some extent also the third –when you need more than one nutrient and two can be applied in the same carrier.
Let’s say there exists a yield curve for crop Y as a function of the level of nutrient X in the soil. Typically, it increases from the origin and levels off with increasing concentration of X in the soil. Thus, there is an evident concentration of X associated with near max yield. Do a soil test and find the concentration of X in your soil is (optimum – your soil) low, so add the difference. Concept of calibration. A lab in NY follows exacting QA / QC and gives excellent analytical results. It will also give you, a La. farmer, recommendations based on the soil nutrient extraction protocol it uses and calibration curves for soil and environmental conditions in NY. Perhaps extraction protocol and calibration curves are not correct for La. soils and environment. Make sense?
Plants get what they need. Excess fertilizer avoided. If fertilizer element is subject to fixation, concentrated mass of fertilizer in small volume of soil saturates the fixation capacity of the soil there so much of the applied fertilizer remains soluble and available for plant uptake.
This is the current situation in La. and many other states –no soil test for N that serves as the basis for recommendations. Rather, the recommendation is based on field plot experiments that indicate the optimum rate on a crop by soil type basis. The reason for no soil test (like total N, nitrate, etc.) is the complexity of the N cycle. Recall?
