140 likes | 288 Views
Advancing Client Satisfaction in the Canada Revenue Agency. Presented at the Alberta Federal Council Meeting, February 12, 2004 Sue Wormington, Director, Strategic Planning & Development Division, Client Services. Background: Our Clients. 24 million individual taxfilers
E N D
Advancing Client Satisfaction in the Canada Revenue Agency Presented at the Alberta Federal Council Meeting, February 12, 2004 Sue Wormington, Director, Strategic Planning & Development Division, Client Services
Background: Our Clients • 24 million individual taxfilers • 2.1 million GST/HST registrants • 1.5 million corporations • 1.5 million employers • 2.8 million Canada Child Tax Benefit recipients • 22,700 registered pension & deferred profit sharing plans • 79,200 registered charities • Provinces/territories, other federal entities, associations (partnerships)
CRA Approach • Mandate is to promote compliance … through communication, quality service, and responsible enforcement … • Strategic outcomes • Compliance • Innovation (that the CRA is a leading-edge service provider) • Increased focus on client service in early 90’s • Culture of service: provide the right information, tools and assistance to clients, at the right time, so they can • voluntarily comply • receive their benefits and entitlements
Citizen Feedback and Engagement • Cornerstone of service excellence and voluntary compliance in CRA: if clients understand their entitlements and obligations, they will comply • Critical to measure client awareness, needs, preferences and satisfaction with the way we deliver our services • Identifies areas where we need to improve or refine those services, or create new services • Results of client-centric approach (examples): • 90% caller accessibility • 98% of tax returns processed per service standard • 99% of benefit payments issued on time • improvement in satisfaction rating, Citizens First
Improvements to Service • Government On-Line: Increase information and transactions available to clients • Service Improvements: Focus on quality of service channels, integrating services • Future Directions: Vision of how CRA will serve specific client groups over 10 year period (individuals and benefit recipients, small businesses, large business, charities) • Service Strategy for Assessment and Collections Branch: How we plan to deliver programs and serve our clients over next 10 years
Quality Service Delivery: Channels of Choice • Four service channels: • In person • Written material • Telephone • Electronic • Multi-channel service options must be available to clients • CRA strives to ensure programs respond to drivers of satisfaction
Telephone Service Improvements • Telephone still most commonly used service channel • 1998, less than 10% accessibility during peak periods: Unacceptable client service levels / low client satisfaction • Citizens First 1998 findings served to support change initiatives – drivers of satisfaction, especially timeliness • Implemented a 1-800 network across call centres in 2000, extended hours of service, reduce need to call • 2003, over 90% accessibility during filing season, through network, flexible staffing arrangements, call forecasting • Simultaneous focus on increased agent accuracy, better tools, focused training, more probing • Next: Telephone Service Standard, to be published 2004
Electronic Service Improvements • Electronic options for filing tax returns • Implementation of “My Account” • Significant redesign of our website (launched Jan 04), using client-centric approach – clients can access information and find answers to their questions by • Program • Function • Client segment (e.g. seniors) • Alphabetically • More links to other government departments and jurisdictions, they do the same in return • Available 24/7
Service Improvement Initiative • CRA fully supports the government-wide approach to service improvement • Participates actively in Service Improvement Initiative (SII) as a lead department; improved service offerings continue • Service standards implemented: • National Service Standards Steering Committee • CRA-wide methodology established in 2000 for developing service standards (creation of a guide) • 37 published service standards (e.g. standard for timeliness re counter service, tax return processing, Problem Resolution Program) • Starting to use the Common Measurement Tool
Client Survey and Feedback Activities • CCRA Annual Survey • Client Service Rating Cards • Web Site User Survey • Program specific satisfaction surveys (e.g. Canada Child Tax Benefit application form; to come: Business Enquiries Telephone Service) • Usability testing; Focus group testing
Annual SurveyMeasuring Up: How Canadians view the CCRA • Designed to assist the CRA in evaluating the public’s perception about the way we design and implement our programs and services • Baseline in 2000, conducted annually • Targeted primarily to ‘individuals” (re taxes, benefits, customs, cheating) • 2002 study: 3,050 interviews by phone • 64% say CCRA does a good/very good job (61% in 2000) • Helps identify potential areas for more in-depth research • Using aspects of CMT (different measurement scale)
Client Service Rating Cards • Introduced in 1992 to monitor client satisfaction with our counter service • Simple, economical tool provides feedback at local office level • 2002-03 results show 95% of clients received the help they needed and rated the service quality as good • Currently being redesigned using CMT methodology
CCRA Web Site User Survey • Purpose: establish baseline measures of user interaction and satisfaction with the CCRA Web site • Objectives included measurement of • Profile of visitors • Awareness of information and services available on the site • Experiences using the site, including: reasons for visit, whether desired service/information was obtained • Satisfaction with aspects of the site and process of using it; Overall satisfaction (78% gave 4 or 5 rating) • Sample of 1,005 people who had visited the web in 2003 • Conducted in Sept/Oct 2003 (CMT approach) • 21-minute questionnaire • Results currently being finalized
The Common Measurement Tool: Advantages • Questions aligned with satisfaction drivers (Citizens First) • Sound methodology for measuring client satisfaction • Common set of core questions • User-friendly • Multi-channel instrument • Already tested • Can compare with other jurisdictions • Community of knowledge – share best practices • Incorporated into Stats Canada (and other) training courses • Element of Service Improvement Initiative • Results useable by policy and program managers • Free (in exchange for sharing results)