1 / 37

Paving in the High Desert

Paving in the High Desert. Edwards Air Force Base, CA Tri-Services Conference April 23, 2008. Overview. Project Scope DB Mentality The Team Design Precepts Construction Challenges Guiding Precepts. Temp Water Line. Batch Plant. Main Runway. Pug Mill. Temporary Runway.

voconnell
Download Presentation

Paving in the High Desert

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Paving in the High Desert Edwards Air Force Base, CA Tri-Services Conference April 23, 2008

  2. Overview • Project Scope • DB Mentality • The Team • Design Precepts • Construction Challenges • Guiding Precepts

  3. Temp Water Line Batch Plant Main Runway Pug Mill Temporary Runway Taxiway B Intersection Taxiway C Intersection Taxiway A Intersection New Power Check Pads New East Arm/ Dearm Apron Edwards Project Layout Dry Lake Bed Taxiway G

  4. CH2M HILL/IHC JV Team • Combines CH2M HILL innovation with IHC PCC paving expertise • Represents: • 60 years in federal work experience • Expertise in managing complex construction operations • Specializes airfield pavements on high-security sites • Nationally recognized aviation design expertise…ASR, PCASE, technology • Recent Airfield pavement projects valued over $300 Million • Projects received the “Best PCC Pavement Constructed in the USA” in Military/Commercial Aviation categories • #1 program management • #1 construction management-for-fee • #8 design-build management • Full service EPC integration worldwide

  5. Integrated Design Build Team • Sprit of Collaboration… Base on Trust • Always Focus on the Problem… no blame! • Meet Early and Often… High Communication • Open Book… Tell Motivation and Disclose • Level of Care… Code, Laws, Agency • Always Align Expectation of Owner Design can’t Make a Decision without Constructability Review Builders Can’t Make a Decision without Design Standard Check

  6. Open Book Mentality • Focus on the Problem…not Your own team • Contingency Funds • Unstable Conditions • Schedule Changes • Stake Holder Info Flow • “You Suck”– Weekly • QC Reconciliation Reviews

  7. Edwards AFB Definition Success Performance Schedule Cost Taxiway Openings Flight Transition to Temp Performance Period LD = $8000/day No ASR Meet Loading Flight Operations Environmental Runway Sustainability Program Amount Funding Per FY Manage to Cost

  8. The Plan!!

  9. Design Impact • Innovations introduced early when influence on outcome was high • Design had free access to Edwards and USACE • Allowed quick exchange of ideas and approvals • Internal team constructability meetings from Day 1

  10. Edwards High Desert Conditions • Mojave Desert, 100 miles NE of Los Angeles • Elevation of Base 2,300’ • Average rainfall 6”/year, (Jan, Feb, Mar) = 4” • Summer average daily max 94 degrees • Summer high 110 degrees • Windy days are common mostly out of NW • Sustained 15 to 30 MPH, • Gusts of 60 to 70 MPH

  11. Temporary Runway • PCC 1,000’ each end and Taxiway B • Asphalt remainder • Asphalt 1,000’ overruns, CTS shoulders • Sheet drainage to 200’ off centerline • New stake mounted R/W edge lights • Balanced earthwork varying elevation of centerline profile & 3 T/W tie-ins • Used unsuitable in lower fill

  12. Main Runway • Existing PCC has ASR, 1953 construction • Remove and replace PCC • Add drainage layer and underdrain system • Remove edge lights (18” off edge) and replace for paving track • Remove 6” of existing subgrade for new pavement section • 5 new plate load tests to verify subgrade

  13. Temporary Pavement Design • 20 year traffic reduced to 2 years in RFP • Traffic Areas A, C and D • PCASE used for thickness design • Different asphalt/PCC and base thickness based on traffic area • PCC flexural required 650, raised to 700 based on production 90 day breaks • Reduce PCC thickness accordingly

  14. Temporary Runway

  15. Main Pavement Design • Given 20-year traffic • Originally used 650 flex, changed to 700 and reduced thickness • Traffic Areas Type A, C and D • PCASE used for design thickness • Different PCC/Base thickness based on Traffic type and drainage layer • USACE k of 250, low CBR’s, verify with new Plate Load Tests when closed

  16. Main Runway

  17. Concrete Mix Design • Mix design flexural beams didn’t show gain until 56 days • Production mix gained much higher than mix design • Using close to the minimum cement factor for durability • Higher strengths are just happening

  18. PCC Strength

  19. Taxiway B Bypass • drawing showing Bypass

  20. Taxiway B Bypass • Allowed 2 taxiways (A and B) to be closed • Designed asphalt for 60 days, hottest months • Reduced traffic for use in PCASE • Optimized pavement section by using mechanistic software • Concerned about “punching” and rutting • Restricted B-52’s and Space Shuttle • Asphalt 4”, Base 7” • Performed fine, no rutting

  21. Innovations • Taxiway B Bypass • Grading Material Handling Plan • Grading models directly from designer to GPS on earthmoving equipment • Tracking on PCC early based on Zero Fatigue Curve Calculation edge stress • On-site computer server for rapid data exchange, QC survey • No earthwork as-built survey, used models

  22. Earthwork Affected Pavement • Pre-watered the excavation areas • Used an irrigation system • Encountered some unsuitable (SC, CL,CH) and some unstable • Required one footof suitable underpavement section

  23. Asphalt Paving Challenges • Crushed aggregate base through pug mill to add moisture • Required 2 lifts, some delamination and drying out • Approved to install inone lift • Hot summer temperaturesdidn’t allow asphalt to cooldown for compaction

  24. Concrete Challenges • Hot summer temperatures required starting early, 5 AM most days • Wind generally doesn’t start until after noon, so paving stopped

  25. Aggregate Challenges • Limited good pits for concrete aggregates • Production limited for simultaneous use of concrete, asphalt, base and drainable base • Some ASR, but mitigated with 15% Type F fly ash

  26. Material Tests • Cement tested in lab • Fly ash tested in lab • Asphalt oil tested in lab • Purpose to verify vendor’s certificates

  27. Construction Challenges • Earthwork shrinkage more than anticipated • Phasing of paving and lighting • Asphalt compaction • All work stops when winds over 25 knots (30 MPH)

  28. Value Drivers Flight Ops Pavement Quality - ASR Environmental Open Communication Inclusive Decision-Making Project Performance Time/Budget Force Protection Safety Security Guiding Precepts TAXIWAY C TEMPORARY RUNWAY TAXIWAY B MAIN RUNWAY 04/22 TAXIWAY A

  29. Questions

  30. Design Portion of D/B • Design was an integrated member of the JV team • Design was not a subcontractor or a subconsultant to the contractor • Innovation and efficiency was expected and achieved • No hidden agendas between design and construction • Ideas were freely exchanged

More Related