1 / 11

New Directions in Strategic Planning 2010-2015

This document outlines the strategic planning efforts from 2010 to 2015, focusing on leadership, access, quality, and resourcefulness. Regional forums provided updates on progress.

volz
Download Presentation

New Directions in Strategic Planning 2010-2015

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010-2015

  2. Setting New Directions2005-2010 Strategic Plan Oversight Committee set priorities Four key priorities Leadership Access Quality Resourcefulness Regional Forums provided updates and status

  3. Definition of Strategic PlanningStrategic planning is a disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization is, what it does and why it does it

  4. The Realities of Planning Plan should anchor System decisions Forces override planning The “landscape” changes Plan should be flexible

  5. Meet state needs for public accountability • Meet institutional and system planning needs • Guided by planning assumptions • Focused on Key Priorities and “vital few” goals

  6. By March 2010, the Board will act on the system plan By September 2010, the Board will act on the institutional strategic plans

  7. Identified, collected, and analyzed data for SWOT analysis • Established website at http://sp.tbr.edu • Identified focal areas of Enrollment/Persistence, Institutional Quality, Affordability, and External Influences • Reported to the SWOT team around such areas as student success measures, financial aid, campus resources, campus environment

  8. Identified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats • Identified themes in findings relevant to focal areas • The analysis suggested • what we need to build upon, what we need to change, what areas we can optimize, and what areas need to managed or countered • Led to the suggested key planning assumptions • Submitted report to Oversight Committee that includes S.W.O.T. analysis, themes, and planning assumptions

  9. Receive the input from SWOT analysis • Adopt the key planning assumptions • Recommend the vision, mission, and key priorities • Recommend one or two key goals for each key priority

  10. December 2009 Board approval of Key Priorities and GoalsMarch 2010 Board approval of System PlanSeptember 2010 Board approval of Campus PlansSystem Plan will provide the foundation for the institutional plans

More Related