210 likes | 860 Views
Blinking Orbital Prosthesis. Hallie Kreitlow, Joel Gaston, Ryan Kimmel, Allison McArton. Outline. Problem Statement Background Summary of PDS Designs and the Matrix Future Work Conclusion. Problem Statement. Realistic blinking orbital prosthesis Same speed as functional eye
E N D
Blinking Orbital Prosthesis Hallie Kreitlow, Joel Gaston, Ryan Kimmel, Allison McArton
Outline • Problem Statement • Background • Summary of PDS • Designs and the Matrix • Future Work • Conclusion
Problem Statement • Realistic blinking orbital prosthesis • Same speed as functional eye • Reasonable size and weight • Non-harmful mechanism and materials • Automated system
Background-Orbital Prosthesis Many causes of eye loss Prosthesis provide a realistic solution Currently, prostheses do not blink
Background-Problem Motivation • Providing a more realistic prosthesis • Syncing the blinking motion in both eyes • Satisfying the patient • Create interest in the field
Product Design Specification • Function • Client Requirements • Design Requirements • Physical and Operational Characteristics • Production Characteristics • Miscellaneous
Function • Animated orbital prosthesis • Currently few attempts • Previously ran a wire from the contralateral eye muscle into orbital prosthesis • Small enough to fit inside eye cavity and contain all parts
Requirements • Client Requirements • Impart life-like quality to a variety of materials • Thin materials to save weight and space • Synchronization could and should be considered later • We are provided with an adequate budget Design Requirements • It must be able to function for an entire day, but it doesn’t need to be aesthetically pleasing
Physical and Operational Characteristics Performance Requirements • Safety • Accuracy, Reliability, and Life in Service • Operating Environment • Ergonomics, Size, and Weight • Materials and aesthetics
Production Characteristics and Miscellaneous • Quantity • Target Product Cost • Standards and Specifications • Patient-related Concerns • Competition
Possible Designs Actuator Movement Attracting Magnetic Field Repelling Magnetic Field Memory Metal Circuit
Actuator movement • Cons • Highly Invasive • Power source must be located in cavity • Components take up a lot of space • Cannot be removed Pros • Will work regardless of environment outside cavity • Durable • Fairly safe
Design-Common Aspects • Air-core solenoid located in glasses frame B-Field i
Repelling Magnetic Field • Pros • Non-invasive • Power source located outside cavity • Power only used when blink occurs • Cons • Large magnetic field/current required Compression Spring Eye Lid B-Field Permanent magnetic plate Boundary of Cavity
Magnetic Field Designs-Alternate View Top View Side View
Attracting Magnetic Field Eye Lid Tension Spring B-Field Permanent magnetic plate Boundary of Cavity Pros • Non-invasive • Power source located outside cavity Cons • Large magnetic field/current required • Constant power must be provided
Memory Metal Circuit Pros • Space efficient Cons • Power source located in cavity • High current running through wire • Extensive circuit engineering required
Future Work • Research on IR sensor • Fabrication of needed parts • Assembly of prototype • Dealing with size issues • Prototype testing • Redesigning and subsequent testing
Conclusion • Extensive research has been done on orbital prosthesis • Developed several designs and chose the best design • Work still needs to be done
Credits • Professor Murphy • Greg Gion • Professor Bruch