210 likes | 339 Views
A 26 o N update and U.S. AMOC Effort www.clivar.us.org. A new interagency program with a focus on AMOC monitoring and prediction capability Present by Molly Baringer
E N D
A 26oN update and U.S. AMOC Effort www.clivar.us.org A new interagency program with a focus on AMOC monitoring and prediction capability Present by Molly Baringer Presented at the Office of Climate Observations Annual Meeting on September 3, 2008 on behalf of the U.S.AMOC Science Team by Molly Baringer NASA Earth Science Division Satellite data analyses, modeling and space-based observations NOAA Climate Program Office Observing systems, monitoring, climate modeling NSF Geosciences program Process studies, models, and observations
The National Ocean Research Priorities Plan and Implementation Strategy presents research priorities that focus on the most compelling issues in key areas of interaction between society and the ocean.
What is the current state of the AMOC? How has the AMOC varied in the past on interannual to centennial time scales? What governs AMOC changes? Is the AMOC predictable on 10-100 year timescales? What are the impacts of AMOC variability and change? Unanswered questions surrounding the AMOC include: October 2007: Implementation Strategy for a JSOST Near-Term Priority: Assessing Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability: Implication for Rapid Climate Change
Western Boundary Time Series (WBTS) U.S. PI’s: M. O. Baringer1, C. S. Meinen1, S. L. Garzoli1 1 NOAA-Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory U.S. Collaborators: B. Johns2, L. Beal2 (MOCHA/NSF) 2 RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami FL International Collaborators: H. Bryden3, S. Cunningham3, T. Kanzow3, J. Marotzke4, J. Hirschi3 (RAPID/NERC) 3 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, U.K. 4 Max Planck Institut, Hamburg, Germany Goal: To provide time series observations of the two main components of the meridional overturning circulation in the Subtropical North Atlantic.
An Observing System for Meridional Heat Transport Variability in the Subtropical Atlantic Funding Agency: NSF (Funded period 2004 – 2014) U.S. PI’s: B. Johns1, M. Baringer2, L. Beal1, C. Meinen2 1 RSMAS, University of Miami, Miami FL 2 NOAA/AOML, Miami, FL International Collaborators’s: H. Bryden3, S. Cunningham3, T. Kanzow3, J. Marotzke4 (RAPID/NERC) 3 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, U.K. 4 Max Planck Institut, Hamburg, Germany U.S. Collaborators: S. Garzoli2 (WBTS/NOAA) Goal:“To set in place a system for continuous observation of the meridional overturning circulation and northward heat transport in the Atlantic Ocean, with which to document its variability and its relationship to observed climate fluctuations, and to assess climate model predictions.” Specific Objectives: • Determine the “present day” mean MOC & MHT at 26°N and year-to-year variability • Determine the spectrum of MOC variability, and related mechanisms, to help optimize MOC observing systems • Provide a benchmark of MOC strength and variability for climate and ocean synthesis models Louise Bell / Neil White, CSIRO
The RAPID-MOC 26.5°N Array Basin wide integrated internal transports (TINT) from zonal density gradient → Funded through 2014 - will provide a 10 year time series (2004-2014) Transport through western boundary wedge (TWBW) from current meter measurements Cunningham et al. (2007) Kanzow et al. (2007) Johns et al. (2008)
Driving Florida current Variability with wind stress curl (WSC) variations DiNezio et al, 2008, JPO, in press. Meinen et al, 2008, JGR, in press Correlation between WSC and the NAO
Gulf Stream transport across 27N [Sv/m] Gulf Stream Transport through the Straits of Florida: Transport profiles Transports [Sv] are projected on empirical vertical mode Transport per unit of depth profiles [Sv/m]
Part One Conclusions • Annual mean MOC transport = 18.8 ± 5 Sv is also slightly larger than estimates from WOCE period (16-18 Sv). • Seasonal cycle emerging… in agreement w/ prior climatological estimates and model results. MOC dominated by FC and interior ocean while the MHT dominated by Ekman annual cycle. • Mean Volume and MHT estimates from the RAPID-MOC array should provide one of the best constrained benchmarks for indirect estimates of the ocean transports (from flux climatologies, TOA radiation, etc.), and for comparison with numerical models. • Annual mean (2004-2006) MHT across 26°N = 1.36 ± 0.11 PW. Consistent with previous direct estimates (within errors), but at upper end. • Short term MHT variability is large. Range -> 0.1 – 2.5 PW, Std. Dev = 0.41 PW and. About half is due to Ekman transport variability, remainder due to geostrophic variability. Range of variability is consistent with eddy-permitting/eddy-resolving models, but geostrophic variability may play a bigger role than previously suggested by models (→ Hirschi et al., 2007)
U.S. AMOC Scientific Objectives • The design and implementation of an AMOC monitoring system • An assessment of AMOC’s role in the global climate • An assessment of AMOC predictability Recommended Activities • Develop an AMOC state estimate or “fingerprint” • Monitor AMOC transports • Evaluate coherence and connectivity of AMOC circulation and transports • Assess AMOC observing systems with ocean models • Reconstruct AMOC variability and associated property fields • Model the ocean state during the instrumental period • Develop longer-term proxies for AMOC variability • Diagnose mechanisms of AMOC variability and change • Assess AMOC predictability • Determine impact and feedback of AMOC variability • Assess role of AMOC in producing observed changes
Line W: A sustained measurement program sampling the North Atlantic Deep Western Boundary Current and Gulf Stream at 39°N U.S. PI’s: J. Toole1, R. Curry1, T. Joyce1, M. McCartney1 and W. Smethie, Jr.2 1 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543 2 Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY 10964 International PI’s: J. Smith3 3 Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4T3 Canada Line W: Volume transport time series
Export Pathways from the Subpolar North Atlantic Funding Agency: NSF (2007 – 2008) PI’s: Amy Bower1 and Susan Lozier2 1 Dept. of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 2 Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC Goal:To obtain a better understanding and description of the pathways of waters that constitute the lower limb of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, with a focus on the Labrador Sea Waters Specific Objectives: • Conduct a field program with RAFOS floats seeded in the Labrador Sea to directly assess pathways • Conduct data and modeling studies to assess dynamics controlling these pathways and their temporal variability
Pathways of meridional circulation in the North Atlantic Ocean U.S. PI’s: P.B. Rhines1, S. Hakkinen2 1 Dept of Oceanography, U. Washington, Seattle, WA 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD Surface drifter tracks show significant changes since year 2000 in the path of the surface currents associated with the North Atlantic Current. Surface drifter tracks entering (cyan) and leaving (magenta) the region (30-50W, 35-45N): during 1991-2000, top, and during 2001-2006, bottom.
LC NAC subtropical strong NAC weak subtropical Assessing Meridional Transports in the North Atlantic Ocean U.S. PI’s: K. A. Kelly1, L. Thompson 1 Applied Physics Lab, University of Washington , Seattle, WA 2 School of Oceanography, U. Washington, Seattle, WA 15 years of surface currents shows that the North Atlantic Current is stronger when the subtropical gyre is weaker (and vice-versa)
Evaluation of Meridional Transport of Water and Heat in the Atlantic Ocean Using Satellite Data PI: W. Timothy Liu, Co-I: XiaosuXie 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, NASA, Pasadena, California Comparing annual mean Atlantic meridional heat transport. Red curve is calculated from four components of satellite surface heat flux. The green curve is computed from ECCO data. Various symbols are from past studies, from surface heat flux or hydrographic data.
Decadal Climate Predictability and Predictions – Focus on the Atlantic U.S. PI’s: T.L. Delworth, A.J. Rosati Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA Princeton, NJ, USA Goal: Determine role of AMOC in producing observed climatic variability Difference in simulated summer rainfall when the AMOC is weak (cold North Atlantic) versus when it is strong (warm North Atlantic). Units are cm per day. Blue indicates less rain when AMOC is weak. Results from GFDL CM2.1 model.
Towards An Understanding Of The Role of The Atlantic Thermohaline and Wind-Driven Circulation In Tropical Atlantic Variability (TAV) U.S. PI’s: P. Chang1, R. Saravanan2 and R. Zhang3 Dept of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Dept of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ Fig. 1: Equatorial Atlantic ocean temperature change in response to North Atlantic fresh water input in GFDL CM2.1. Fig. 2: Simulated changes in monsoon rainfall over West Africa. (After Chang et al. 2008)
Recommended Activities • Develop an AMOC state estimate or “fingerprint” • Monitor AMOC transports • Evaluate coherence and connectivity of AMOC circulation and transports • Assess AMOC observing systems with ocean models • Reconstruct AMOC variability and associated property fields • Model the ocean state during the instrumental period • Develop longer-term proxies for AMOC variability • Diagnose mechanisms of AMOC variability and change • Assess AMOC predictability • Determine impact and feedback of AMOC variability • Assess role of AMOC in producing observed changes New U.S. AMOC Projects starting soon: • Variability and Forcing Mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation - Tong Lee/ Jet Propulsion Laboratory with Harvard University, University of Hamburg, and Laboratoire de Physique des Oceans • Atlantic MOC Observing System Studies Using Adjoint Models - Carl Wunsch/ MIT with AER, Inc. • A NOPP Partnership for AMOC: Focused Analysis of Satellite Data Sets - Peter Minnett/ Miami with Remote Sensing Systems, Inc. • Observing System Simulation Experiments for the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation - George Halliwell/Miami with NOAA AOML
AMOC Open Science Meeting May 4-6 2009, Annapolis, MD • What is the current state of the AMOC? • How has the AMOC varied in the past on interannual to centennial time scales? • What governs AMOC changes? • Is the AMOC predictable on 10-100 year timescales? • What are the impacts of AMOC variability and change? Outcomes • What is the optimal observing system design for the AMOC? How could the system components be prioritized and phased to accommodate funding constraints? • Is there an identifiable and measurable AMOC fingerprint that can be used to constrain the requirements for an AMOC observing system? • What aspects or regions of the circulation are likely to require more intensive measurements, based on existing observations? • How should critical societal impacts of AMOC guide observing system design and phasing?
Summary U.S. effort is spinning up; some early tangible results Continued partnership with international collaborators is essential to the community-wide goals of AMOC monitoring and prediction Particular need for collaboration is for transatlantic measurements; the monitoring of subpolar North Atlantic and subtropical South Atlantic are key priorities.