1.64k likes | 1.76k Views
The Virginia Tech Neuropsychology Laboratory. A Functional Neural Systems Approach Emotion: Health Sex Differences & Aging Emotional Disorders. HOSTILITY & HEALTH. A Robust Literature On Hostility, Cardiovascular Lability, and Cardiovascular Risk .
E N D
The Virginia TechNeuropsychology Laboratory A Functional Neural Systems Approach Emotion: Health Sex Differences & Aging Emotional Disorders
HOSTILITY & HEALTH A Robust Literature On Hostility, Cardiovascular Lability, and Cardiovascular Risk
SEX DIFFERENCES & HEALTHLATERALITY ISSUES? A Robust Literature On Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Lability, and Cardiovascular Risk
AGING & HEALTHRIGHT HEMI-AGING? A Robust Literature On Cardiovascular Lability, and Cardiovascular Risk
Right Brain Sympathetic Tone Sweating; >BP;>HR Glucose Mobilization Cholesterol Mobilization Left Brain Parasympathetic Quiescent State Digestion Absorption Cerebral Mediation of Emotion:& the Autonomic Nervous System
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY & EMOTION THEORY • RIGHT HEMISPHERE MODEL • HEILMAN (1982) • RIGHT CEREBRUM: • Primary Role in Emotion & Arousal • POSTERIOR = “Sensory Reception or Attention” • ANTERIOR = “Motor Expression or Intention”
VALENCE MODEL • TUCKER & WILLIAMSON (1984) • DAVIDSON (1993) • “Balance Model” or “Valence Model” • Relative Right Frontal Activation • NEGATIVE AFFECT • Relative Left Frontal Activation • POSITIVE AFFECT
BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION MODEL (BIS/BAS) • GRAY • A NONHUMAN ANIMAL MODEL • BAS & LEFT FRONTAL ACTIVATION • POSITIVE AFFECT • APPROACH • BIS & RIGHT FRONTAL ACTIVATION • NEGATIVE AFFECT • FEAR OR ANXIETY
DOMINANCE-SUBMISSION MODEL • DEMAREE, EVERHART, YOUNGSTROM, & HARRISON (2004) • LEFT FRONTAL ACTIVATION: • DOMINANCE • RIGHT FRONTAL ACTIVATION: • SUBMISSION
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS • LESS CONTROVERSY: • Right Brain & Negative Emotion • MORE CONTROVERSY: • Asymmetry For Positive Emotion • Except for Heilman • Models Ignore Sensory or Posterior Brain
DYNAMIC FUNCTIONAL NEURAL SYSTEMS THEORY • SENSORY ANALYSIS = • POSTERIOR BRAIN • SENSORY PROJECTION AREAS • INHIBITORY REGULATION & MOTOR EXPRESSION • THE FRONTAL LOBES • INHIBITORY REGULATION • INTENTION • MOTOR PROJECTION AREAS
Our Functional Systems Approach:Systematic Research & Replication
VISION • FACIAL AFFECT, T-SCOPE, RT • N = 52 (26 Men; 26 Women) • Harrison, Gorelczenko, & Cook, 1990 • Left VF Advantage • Asymmetry in Men Differs From Women
Reaction Time(log 10)By Visual Field Harrison & Gorel, 1990
Replication • Harrison & Gorelczenko (1990) • Crews & Harrison (1994) • RT Faster at Left VF • SYMMETRY for positive faces • ASYMMETRY In Men Not = Women • Herridge, Harrison, Shenal, Mollet (2003) • ACCURACY Increased at Left VF
Reaction Time (secs) By Visual Field VISUAL FIELD Crews & Harrison, 1994
Reaction Time (LOG10) By Visual Field VISUAL FIELD Harrison & Gorel, 1990 (men & women)
Reaction Time (LOG10) By Visual Field Harrison & Gorel, 1990 (men & women)
Accuracy (# Correct) By Visual Field Herridge, Harrison, Shenal, Mollet, 2004
The Right Hemi-Aging Hypothesis • McDowell, Harrison, Demaree, 1994 • 10 Faces Depicting 5 Affective Valences • 50 Item Photo Album (Ekman’s Faces) • Elderly & Younger Men & Women (N=60) • Results: • Accuracy of Happy Affect Faces = No Difference • Elderly Impaired on Accuracy of Each Negative Affect Valence (Sad, Angry, & Fearful)
Correct Responses By Age and Affect CategoryMcDowell, Harrison, Demaree, 1994 MEAN # CORRECT AFFECTIVE VALENCE
Billings, Harrison, & Alden, 1993 • Reduced Left Visual Field Bias Among Elderly Women • Neutral Faces
Reported Affect (Bias) For Neutral Faces by Visual FieldBillings, Harrison, & Alden, 1993 REPORTED AFFECT
Visual Hallucinations: A Clinical Study • Walters, Harrison, Foster, Williamson, 2004 • Retrospective Review of Archival Data • 200 Patients on Rehabilitation Unit at a • Tertiary Care Medical Center • 30 Identified With Visual Formaesthesias • 16 Men & 14 Women
Visual Formaesthesias: Affective Valence by Visual Field PERCENT VISUAL FIELD Walter,Harrison,Foster,Williamson,2004
“Eye Drillers”, look a hole through you, no noises, they don’t like you, wear black religious clothing “Hee Haw Boys” too happy, talk too much, colorful Hawaiian shirts Multimodal Paraesthesia Thalamic Syndrome Right Visual Field Left Visual Field Mollet, Walters, & Harrison, 2004
HOSTILITY & VISION • Harrison & Gorelczenko, 1990 (243 Ss=13) • High Hostile Men; Low Hostile Men • High Hostile Women; Low Hostile Women • NO STRESS CHALLENGE! • HOSTILE = NEGATIVE BIAS AT LVF
NEGATIVE AFFECT BIASNEUTRAL FACES IDENTIFIED AS “ANGRY” Harrison & Gorel, 1990
EMOTIONAL FACE RECOGNITION • Herridge, Harrison, Mollet, & Shenal, 2004 • High Hostile Men; Low Hostile Men • HOSTILE = Less Accurate at LVF • COLD PRESSOR: Affects Accuracy • LOW HOSTILE:Less Accurate Post CP
EMOTIONAL FACE RECOGNITION # C O R R E C T Herridge, Harrison, Mollet,&Shenal, 2004
Emotional Face Recognition Pre & Post Cold Pressor # C O R R E C T Herridge, Harrison, Mollet,&Shenal,2004
AUDITION • DICHOTIC WORDS • Snyder, Harrison, & Gorman, 1996 • N=45 men • tower, dower, power, bower • neutral, angry, happy, sad • REA WORDS > REA AFFECT • LEA AFFECT > LEA WORDS
Total Correct By Ear #CORRECT EAR Snyder,Harrison,Gorman,1996
Replication • LEA EMOTIONAL SOUNDS • Emerson, Everhart, Williamson & Harrison, 1999 (children) • REA WORD SOUNDS • Emerson, Everhart, Williamson & Harrison, 1999 (children) • Alden, Harrison,Snyder,&Everhart, 1997 (elderly) • Demaree & Harrison, 1997 (adults) • Hagopian & Harrison, unpublished (children)
Percent Correct By Ear % CORRECT EAR Emerson, Everhart, Williamson & Harrison, 1999
Ear Advantage For Emotional Valence Dichotic Listening % CORRECT VALENCE Emerson,Everhart,Williamson & Harrison, 1999
Asymmetry in Men Differs From Women • Higgins & Harrison, unpublished
Sex DifferencesLaterality For Speech Sounds POC SCORE Higgins & Harrison, unpublished
Sex Differences In Frontal Lobe LateralityFocused Listening to Left or Right Ear S Y S T O L I C B P SIDE OF FOCUS
The Right Hemi-Aging Hypothesis • Alden, Harrison, Snyder, & Everhart, 1997 • Age Differences in Intention to Right & to Left Hemispace • Dichotic Listening • Elderly & Younger Women (N=54) • Results: • Right Ear Advantage for CV Sounds • No Difference • Elderly Impaired • on Directing Intention to the Left Ear
CVs Identified at the Left and Right Ear by Age & FocusAlden, Harrison, Snyder, & Everhart, 1997 TOTAL DETECTED FOCUS
HOSTILITY & AUDITION • COLD PRESSOR STRESS • DICHOTIC LISTENING • CARDIOVASCULAR MEASURES • Demaree & Harrison, 1997b
High Hostile vs. Low Hostile • HIGH HOSTILE: Cardiac Reactivity (HR) • Enhanced LEA • RIGHT Cerebral Activation to Stress • LOW HOSTILE: Cardiac Stability (HR) • Enhanced REA • LEFT Cerebral Activation to Stress
Heart Rate Pre & Post Stress Conditions H E A R T R A T E Demaree & Harrison, 1997B
Number of Left Ear StimuliBy Stress Condition # I D E N T I F I E D Demaree & Harrison, 1997B