220 likes | 308 Views
Asking better questions to build better models. Sharon Dawes. Some policy questions. Should we eradicate polio? How can schools help third graders become good readers? What kinds of public investments lead to urban vitality? What is the optimal approach to immigration?
E N D
Asking better questions to build better models Sharon Dawes
Some policy questions • Should we eradicate polio? • How can schools help third graders become good readers? • What kinds of public investments lead to urban vitality? • What is the optimal approach to immigration? • How does health insurance coverage affect health care costs? • Can a ban on large sugary drinks reduce obesity and diabetes? • Does public posting of sanitary inspections lead to cleaner restaurants? • . . .
Why models are wrong Complexity Boundaries Dynamics Data Time
Complexity Wicked problems Structured problems Tangled problems
Boundaries • What goes in the model, what is left out, and why and how do the choices matter? • Organizations, jurisdictions, sectors • Groups, individuals and their interests • Existing policies and laws • Contextual factors • Processes • Practices • Geography • Behaviors
Dynamics Feedback structure of URBAN1, Ghaffarzadegan, et al.
The “best available data” (BAD) is inherently flawed Data problems Accuracy Completeness Bias Timeliness Availability . . . Knowledge problems • Meaning • Explicitness • Codifiability • Embeddedness • Dynamics
Time Problem definition Goal setting Policy formulation Strategy formulation Deployment Implementation Operations Design Development Performance assessment Evaluation
Policy modeling over time Problem definition Goal setting Policy formulation Strategy formulation Deployment Implementation Operations Design Development Performance assessment Evaluation Understanding the problem and the options Exploring alternative approaches Understanding the policy system Evaluating and interpreting policy impacts
Stakeholders bring • Different knowledge and points of view • Different goals and preferences • Different capabilities and authority to act • Different cultures (national, organizational, professional) • Different amounts and kinds of power and autonomy • Different levels of confidence and trust • Different amounts of tolerance for risk
An example: eradication of poliowith thanks to Dr. Kimberly Thompson & colleagues
Collaborators The collaborators gratefully acknowledge financial support in the form of unrestricted gifts to the Harvard Kids Risk Project and grants from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): U50/CCU300860, U01 IP000029, NVPO N37 (FY2005), 200-2010-M-33379, 200-2010-M-33679, 200-2010-M-35172, U66 IP000169, the World Health Organization (WHO) APW200179134, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: 4533-17492 , 4533-18487, 4533-21031. I thank RadboudDuintjerTebbens for embarking and continuing on the entire journey with me. I also thank collaborators from the CDC, including James Alexander, Lorraine Alexander, Larry Anderson, Gregory Armstrong, Albert Barskey, Brenton Burkholder, Cara Burns, Victor Cáceres, Jason Cecil, Susan Chu, Steve Cochi, Kathleen Gallagher, Howard Gary, John Glasser, Steve Hadler, Karen Hennessey, Hamid Jafari, Julie Jenks, Denise Johnson, Bob Keegan, Olen Kew, Nino Khetsuriani, Robb Linkins, NaileMalakmadze, Rebecca Martin, Eric Mast, Steve McLaughlin, Steve Oberste, Mark Pallansch, Becky Prevots, HardeepSandhu, NalineeSangrujee, Jean Smith, Philip Smith, Peter Strebel, Linda Venczel, Gregory Wallace, Steve Wassilak, Margie Watkins, and Bruce Weniger, and from the WHO, including Bruce Aylward, Fred Caillette, Claire Chauvin, Philippe Duclos, Esther deGourville, Hans Everts, Marta Gacic-Dobo, Tracey Goodman, Ulla Griffiths, David Heymann, Scott Lambert, Asta Lim, Jennifer Linkins, Patrick Lydon, Chris Maher, Linda Muller, Roland Sutter, Rudi Tangermann, Chris Wolff, and David Wood. I also thank the Global Polio Laboratory Network, Harrie van der Avoort, Francois Bompart, Anthony Burton, Konstantin Chumakov, Laurent Coudeville, Walter Dowdle, Paul Fine, Michael Galway, Shanelle Hall, Neal Halsey, TapaniHovi, Kun Hu, DominikaKalkowska, Samuel Katz, Jong-Hoon Kim, Tracy Lieu, Marc Lipsitch, Anton van Loon, ApoorvaMallya, Phil Minor, John Modlin, Van Hung Nguyen, Walter Orenstein, Carol Pandak, Peter Patriarca, Christina Pedreira, Stanley Plotkin, HazhirRahmandad, Robert Scott, John Sever, Thomas Sorensen, John Sterman, Robert Weibel, Jay Wenger, and Peter Wright.
Selected academic results Thompson, K. M. (2012). The role of risk analysis in polio eradication: Modeling possibilities, probabilities, and outcomes to inform choices. Expert Review of Vaccines, 11(1), 5-7.Thompson, K. M. (2006). Poliomyelitis and the role of risk analysis in global infectious disease policy and management. Risk Analysis, 26(6), 1419-1421.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2012). Current polio global eradication and control policy options: Perspectives from modeling and prerequisites for OPV cessation. Expert Review of Vaccines, 11(4), 449-459.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2011). Challenges related to the economic evaluation of the direct and indirect benefits and the costs of disease elimination and eradication efforts. In S. L. Cochi & W. R. Dowdle (Eds.), Disease Eradication in the 21st Century: Implications for Global Health. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2008a). The case for cooperation in managing and maintaining the end of poliomyelitis: Stockpile needs and coordinated OPV cessation. The Medscape Journal of Medicine, 10(8),190. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/578396.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2008b). Using system dynamics to develop policies that matter: Global management of poliomyelitis and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 24(4), 433-449.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2007). Eradication versus control for poliomyelitis: An economic analysis. The Lancet, 369(9570),1363-71.Thompson, K. M., & DuintjerTebbens, R. J. (2006). Retrospective cost-effectiveness analyses for polio vaccination in the United States. Risk Analysis, 26(6),1423-1440.
Some suggestions • Build relationships with policy makers and policy advisors • Treat models as learning objects to be improved by interaction with the people who own the policy problem. • Adopt techniques that engage stakeholders • group model building, participatory design, value-sensitive design • Learn and speak the language of practice • Custom-make presentations for policy makers and managers • Consider multiple methods to understand context and complexity • case studies, test beds, evaluation studies • Update, iterate, adjust, repeat
Many questions, many answers, better models The big policy question ÷ Elements of complexity Boundary questions Data challenges Dynamic interactions Time considerations X Multiple iterationsPlain language = Insights, better understanding of policy options and effects
To continue the discussion • eGovPoliNet project, http://www.policy-community.eu/ • Policy Making 2.0 community on Linked In • PIN-l listserv • PIN website: pin.asu.edu • Handbook of Policy Informatics (forthcoming, MIT Press) • International Digital Government Research Conference (dgo) • Policy Informatics Panel, June 17-20, Quebec City • International Research Society for Public Mgmt (IRSPM) • Policy Informatics Track, April 10-12, Prague • Twitter hashtag: #policyinformatics