1 / 19

Participant Experiences in an Informal twitter Sub-network

Participant Experiences in an Informal twitter.com Sub-network. Jennifer Maddrell Doctoral Student at Old Dominion University AACE E-learn 2010 – Brief Paper Presentation October 18-22, 2010. Click for audio ->. Nice to meet you …. Working on my dissertation

wardah
Download Presentation

Participant Experiences in an Informal twitter Sub-network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Participant Experiences in an Informal twitter.com Sub-network Jennifer Maddrell Doctoral Student at Old Dominion University AACE E-learn 2010 – Brief Paper Presentation October 18-22, 2010 Click for audio ->

  2. Nice to meet you … • Working on my dissertation • Research interest in distance and online learning • Live in Chicago and visit these places, too: • http://designedtoinspire.com • http://twitter.com/JenM • http://edtechtalk.com

  3. Case Study Research Questions • What is the nature of communication and interaction within a twitter sub-network? • Why do users in the sub-network participate? • How do users represent themselves, including the demographic information they chose to share within their profiles?

  4. Qualitative Case Study 3,100 in Reciprocal Following Sub-network

  5. Nature of Relationships

  6. Data Collection

  7. Observation Periods

  8. Observation Checklist

  9. Profile Review

  10. Focus of Interview Questions • Background information • Twitter use • Perceptions of twitter • Communication on twitter • Community and relationships on twitter

  11. Nature of Communication • Always on / always accessible • 75 different applications used to tweet • “live”, “transient”, “office buddy”, “glance”, “graze”, “cocktail party”, “ambi-synchronous” • Broadcast messages and conversations • 1 in 3 tweets including @ symbol • Half of those were re-tweets RT@ • Shared interest communication • 1 in 5 tweets included # tag • Word clouds suggest shared interests

  12. Wordle.net Word Cloud of Tweets

  13. Wordle.net Word Cloud of Biographies

  14. Nature of Interaction • Network ties • Most not linked by geography or workplace • Shared interest and weak-tie relationships • Transparency • Post specific details of personal & professional life • Central to relationship formation & maintenance • Audience awareness • Pay attention to followed by / following lists • Care about post relevance and suitability to audience

  15. Motivations to Participate • Access • People • Information • Resources • Reciprocity • Sharing of knowledge a condition of membership • Contributions are a form of network currency

  16. Summary of Study • Twitter serves as a virtual coffee machine • Sub-network bound by shared interest • Network ties: • Clusters of strong-tie relationships • Weak-tie acquaintances • Transparency central to weak tie formation • Reciprocity is network currency and payment for membership

  17. Significance of Findings • Sub-network formed organically over years • Suggests drivers behind on-going participation • Cannot generalize to other sub-networks • Does not suggest results would be the same in sub-network created by teacher

  18. Questions for Future Research • Is the required level of user transparency and self-discloser feasible in most educational settings? • Would an experienced professional be willing to interact with a novice and, if so, would the communication and interaction be at a meaningful level? • To what extent do these network characteristics and participant motivators exist in other contexts and settings?

  19. Please share your thoughts … http://designedtoinspire.com/drupal/aace2010twitter

More Related