340 likes | 905 Views
Climate Smart Agriculture. Implications for Feed the Future A Framework. Moffatt K. Ngugi Climate Change, NRM & Ag Program Analyst Bureau for Food Security (CSI) 1300 Pennsylvania Ave 2.10.40, NW, Washington DC 20523 TEL: 202.712.0476 | mngugi@usaid.gov. Outline.
E N D
Climate Smart Agriculture Implications for Feed the Future A Framework Moffatt K. Ngugi Climate Change, NRM & Ag Program Analyst Bureau for Food Security (CSI) 1300 Pennsylvania Ave 2.10.40, NW, Washington DC 20523 TEL: 202.712.0476 | mngugi@usaid.gov
Outline Context/History Definitions Implications
USAID supports and advances best practices in agriculture and rural development. 2010: Feed the Future Guide ~climate change and environment crosscutting themes, guidance on adaptation and resilience. Experience and new policy directives ~ consider mitigation opportunities to advance climate-smart approaches strengthening adaptation and resilience USAID legacy in Agriculture and food security
The intersection of climate change and agriculture • Climate change poses major risks • erratic temperatures, precipitation changes, rising sea levels and the increase in frequency and severity of extreme weather events. • Small-holder farmers, pastoralists and fishers especially vulnerable as their production systems often lack the resources to manage an effective response to climate threats. Image from http://bit.ly/1BhCdBb
Development Policy Context for CSA • September 23, 2014 President Obama issued Executive Order #13677 on Climate-Resilient International Development at the UN Secretary-General’s “Climate Summit” • USG joined many other nations and organizations in launching the GlobalAlliancefor Climate Smart Agriculture
A working definition of CSA • Sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and incomes; • Adapting and building resilience to climate change; and • Reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas emissions, where appropriate (the FAO definition uses possible). Image courtesy of FAO
CSA Aspirationalprinciples • Holistic approach: CSA is not a practice(s), dynamically considers challenges that arise at the intersection of climate change and agriculture • Intentionality: thoughtfulness of coping strategies (adaptation) and, where appropriate, how activities will impact climate change (mitigation) • Multiple benefits: integrate options to maximize synergies and reduce tradeoffs & achieve multiple benefits. • Context specific: specific to the relevant geography and climate change impacts as well as socio-economic, political, cultural, and environmental factors. • Long-term perspective: acknowledges and addresses short term needs while encouraging a long-term optic of future climate change impacts/uncertainties. Embeds agility to incorporate and act on new information
Programmatic and implementation implication • Sound climate data and science. • Development of climate smart technologies and innovations • Strengthen human and institutional capacity. • Strengthen the enabling environment. • Partnerships for Impact.
Challenges & opportunities • Use M&E systems within the Agency: • Consultation across USAID: Missions, Regional Bureaus, Pillar Bureaus… • Leveraging expertise: CCAFS, FAO, WB… • Incorporating CSA at policy and program levels • Knowledge Management: • Integrating CSA in Research Programs: Innovation Labs, HESN, HICD/BIFAD • Scaling agricultural technologies