1 / 42

REU Wednesdays at One: Scanning Probe Microscopy

REU Wednesdays at One: Scanning Probe Microscopy. Susan Enders Department of Engineering Mechanics. June 30 th , 2010. Microscopy. Optical. Scanning Probe. Electron. uses visible light and system of lenses to magnify oldest and simplest design new digital

waters
Download Presentation

REU Wednesdays at One: Scanning Probe Microscopy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REU Wednesdays at One:Scanning Probe Microscopy Susan Enders Department of Engineering Mechanics June 30th, 2010

  2. Microscopy Optical Scanning Probe Electron • uses visible light and system of lenses to magnify • oldest and simplest design • new digital microscopes use CCD camera • magnification up to 2000 times • uses a particle beam of electrons to illuminate a specimen • create a highly- magnified image • uses electrostatic and electromagnetic lenses • magnification up to 2 million times • forms images of surfaces using a physical probe that scans the specimen • surface image produced by mechanically moving probe in a raster scan of the specimen and recording probe-surface interaction as a function of position • atomic resolution • was founded in 1981

  3. AFM, atomic force microscope BEEM, ballistic electron emission microscope EFM, electrostatic foce microscope ESTM, electrochemical scanning tunneling microscope FMM, force modulation microscope KPFM, kelvin probe force microscope MFM, magnetic force microscope MRFM, magnetic resonance force microscope NSOM, Near-Field scanning optical microscope (or SNOM, scanning near-field optical microscopy) PFM, Piezo Force Microscopy PSTM, photon sanning tunneling microscope PTMS, photothermal microspectroscopy/microscope SAP, scanning atom probe SECM, scanning electrochemical microscope SCM, scanning capacitance microscope SGM, scanning gate microscope SICM, scanning ion-conductance microscope SPSM, spin polarized tunneling microscope SThM, scanning thermal microscope STM, scanning tunneling microscope SVM, scanning voltage microscope SHPM, scanning Hall probe microscope SPM Types

  4. powerful technique for viewing surfaces at the atomic level invented in 1981 by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer (at IBM Zürich) Nobel Prize in Physics in 1986 probes the density of states of a material using tunneling current good resolution is considered to be 0.1 nm lateral resolution and 0.01 nm depth resolution can be used not only in ultra high vacuum but also in air and various other liquid or gas ambients, and at temperatures ranging from near zero kelvin to a few hundred degrees Celsius based on the concept of quantum tunneling Scanning tunneling microscope - STM

  5. Classic “Tunnel Effect”

  6. Quantum Mechanics: The Tunnel Effect

  7. Using the Tunnel Effectfor Imaging Binnig & Rohrer, 1982, Nobel Prize in Physics 1986

  8. Using the Tunnel Effect for Imaging Binnig & Rohrer, 1982, Nobel Prize in Physics 1986

  9. piezo-céramique pm = 0.000000001 mm pointe échantillon Using the Tunnel Effect for Imaging

  10. movie: by courtesy of Dr. Dirk Sander, Max Planck Institute Halle, Germany sander@mpi-halle.de, www.mpi-halle.de

  11. The Real Thing 2 inch

  12. Surface of Au: atoms are visible!

  13. Atoms and Molecules at Surfaces 4.2 Kelvin Co atoms on a Copper surface N. Knorr, A. Schneider Dept. Prof. Kern, MPI Stuttgart, Germany

  14. Moving Things Around

  15. Fe atoms on Cu (111) IBM Almaden , D. Eigler

  16. Fe atoms on Cu (111) IBM Almaden , D. Eigler

  17. Xe / Ni(110) D. Eigler & E. Schweizer, Nature 344, 524 (1990)

  18. very high-resolution type of SPM resolution of fractions of a nanometer - 1000 times better than the optical diffraction limit STM precursor to the AFM Binnig, Ouate and Gerber invented the first AFM in 1986 one of the foremost tools for imaging, measuring and manipulating matter at the nanoscale information is gathered by "feeling" the surface with a mechanical probe Piezoelectric elements facilitate tiny but accurate and precise movements enable the very precise scanning Atomic Force Microscope AFM

  19. Cantilevers and their properties • Typically made of SixNy • Spring constants in the range of 1 - 40 N/m (Forces from 0,1nN – 20 µN) • Tips range from a pyramid to very sharp, high aspect ratio tips, to flat punches. J. E. Sader, Review of Scientific Instruments -- April 2003 -- Volume 74, Issue 4, pp. 2438-2443

  20. cantilever with a sharp tip (probe) is used to scan the specimen surface tip is brought into proximity of a sample surface -> forces between tip and sample lead to a deflection of the cantilever according to Hooke’s law forces measured in AFM include mechanical contact force, Van der Waals forces, capillar forces, chemical bonding, electrostatic forces, magnetic forces, Casimir forces, solvation forces etc… deflection is measured using a laser spot reflected from the top surface of the cantilever into an array of photodiodes if tip was scanned at a constant height -> risk that the tip collides with the surface -> damage -> feedback mechanism adjusts the tip-to-sample distance to maintain a constant force between tip and sample sample is mounted on a piezoelectric tube which moves it z direction for maintaining a constant force, and x and y for scanning AFM can be operated in a number of modes, depending on the application possible imaging modes are divided into static (also called Contact) modes and dynamic (or non-contact) modes where the cantilever vibrates AFM can be used to image and manipulate atoms and structures on surfaces Basic principle

  21. Atomic Force Microscope (AFM)

  22. Laser Beam Deflection

  23. Laser Beam Deflection

  24. Laser Beam Deflection

  25. the static tip deflection is used as a feedback signal measurement of a static signal is prone to noise and drift -> low stiffness cantilevers used to boost the deflection signal close to the surface of the sample, attractive forces can be quite strong -> tip 'snaps-in' to the surface static mode AFM is almost always done in contact where overall force is repulsive technique called 'contact mode‘ force between the tip and the surface is kept constant during scanning by maintaining a constant deflection Imaging modesStatic mode

  26. tip of the cantilever does not contact the sample surface cantilever is oscillated at a frequency slightly above its resonance frequency (amplitude ~ few nanometers (<10nm)) van der Waals forces (strongest from 1nm to 10nm above surface) or other long range force which extends above the surface acts to decrease the resonance frequency of the cantilever decrease in resonance frequency combined with feedback loop system maintains a constant oscillation amplitude or frequency by adjusting the average tip-to-sample distance Measuring tip-to-sample distance at each (x,y) data point allows software to construct topographic image of sample surface AFM does not suffer from tip or sample degradation effects non-contact AFM preferable to contact AFM for measuring soft samples in case of rigid samples, contact and non-contact images may look the same Imaging modes -Dynamic mode

  27. AFM provides a true 3D surface profile samples viewed by AFM do not require special treatments Most AFM modes work perfectly well in ambient air or even a liquid Study of biological macromolecules and even living organisms gives true atomic resolution in ultra-high vacuum (UHV) and liquid environments high resolution AFM is comparable in resolution to STM and TEM disadvantage of AFM is image size (maximum height in mm and maximum scanning area around 150 by 150 mm) incorrect choice of tip for required resolution can lead to image artifacts relatively slow rate of scanning during AFM imaging often leads to thermal drift in the image AFM images can be affected by hysteresis of the piezoelectric material and cross-talk between the (x,y,z) axes ->may require software enhancement and filtering filtering could "flatten" out real topographical features AFM probes cannot measure steep walls or overhangs Advantages and disadvantages

  28. DualScope™ Microscope • Sample size: Ø 50 mm • Sample height: 5 mm • Scan size: 40 x 40 µm • Z range: 2.7 µm www.dme-spm.dk

  29. Bearing www.dme-spm.dk

  30. Wooden Fibres www.dme-spm.dk

  31. Landing Zone of Hard Disk www.dme-spm.dk

  32. Motheye www.dme-spm.dk

  33. nanostructure investigation that breaks the far field resolution limit by exploiting the properties of evanescent waves done by placing the detector very close (<< λ) to the specimen surface allows for the surface inspection with high spatial, spectral and temporal resolving power resolution of the image is limited by the size of the detector aperture and not by the wavelength of the illuminating light lateral resolution of 20 nm and vertical resolution of 2-5 nm has been demonstrated contrast mechanism can be adapted to study different properties (refractive index, chemical structure, local stress) Dynamic properties can also be studied at a sub-wavelength scale Near-field scanning optical microscope NSOM/SNOM

  34. Operating Principleoptical microscopy 1870 Ernst Abbe : d > λ / (2sinθ) d = distance between the two objects λ = wavelength of the incident light 2θ = angle through which the light is collected. best resolution with optical light is about 200 nm

  35. if a subwavelength hole in a metal sheet is scanned close to an object, a super-resolved image can be built up from the detected light that passes through the hole light passes through a sub-wavelength diameter aperture and illuminates a sample that is placed within its near field (distance much less than the wavelength of the light) achieved resolution is far better than conventional optical microscopy Operating PrincipleSNOM

  36. Modes of Operation • Transmission mode imaging • - sample is illuminated through the probe • - light passing through the sample is collected and detected • Reflection mode imaging • - sample is illuminated through the probe • - light reflected from the sample surface is collected and detected • 3) Collection mode imaging • - sample is illuminated with a macroscopic light source from the top or bottom • - probe is used to collect the light from the sample surface • 4) Illumination/collection mode imaging • - probe is used for both the illumination of sample and for collection of reflected signal

  37. SNOM - Limit Amount of light that can be transmitted by a small aperture poses a limit on how small it can be made before nothing gets though To a degree this can be lived with, as more optical power can be generated, but the cutoff is so severe that it cannot be made smaller.

  38. instead of using a small aperture, a metal tip is used to provide local excitation if a sharp metal tip is placed in the focus of a laser beam, an effect called local field enhancement will cause the electric field to become roughly 1000 times stronger enhancement is localized to the tip, which has a typical diameter of 10 nm as this tip is scanned over the surface, an image can be formed with a resolution as fine as the tip Next Step Field Enhancement Microscopy

  39. Optical scans made with BioLyser SNOM Shear Force Imaging Bovine Kidney Cells, non-contact mode: 10 µm scan 3D view of Bovine Kidney cell sample Aluminum projection pattern on glas Julien Toquant, University of Basel

  40. resolution not limited by diffraction, but only by the size of the probe-sample interaction volume ( few picometers) ability to measure small local differences in object height (like that of 135 picometre steps on <100> silicon) probe-sample interaction extends only across the tip atom or atoms involved in the interaction interaction can be used to modify the sample to create small structures (nanolithography) do not require a partial vacuum but can be observed in air at standard temperature and pressure or while submerged in a liquid reaction vessel. SPM Advantages

  41. detailed shape of the scanning tip difficult to determine (effect particularly noticeable if the specimen varies greatly in height over lateral distances of 10 nm or less) generally slower in acquiring images due to the scanning process embedding of spatial information into a time sequence leads to uncertainties in metrology (lateral spacings and angles) which arise due to time-domain effects like specimen drift, feedback loop oscillation, and mechanical vibration The maximum image size is generally smaller not useful for examining buried solid-solid or liquid-liquid interfaces SPM Disadvantages

  42. The End

More Related