120 likes | 140 Views
Interoperability for Disaster Relief Operations in Smart City Environments. Manas Pradhan Doctoral Symposium WF- IoT 2019 | 15th-18th April 2019. Overview. Introduction: Background and Motivation Objectives and Entailed Scientific Work Scientific, Technological and Social Impact
E N D
Interoperability for Disaster Relief Operations in Smart City Environments • Manas Pradhan • Doctoral Symposium • WF-IoT 2019 | 15th-18th April 2019
Overview • Introduction: Background and Motivation • Objectives and Entailed Scientific Work • Scientific, Technological and Social Impact • Milestones
Introduction and Background • Internet-of-Things (IoT) w.r.t hardware and software. • Smart Cities Concept. • Pilot tolarge-scaledeployment. • Smart City Information and Communications Technology (ICT) assets. • Legacy andIoTassets. Source: https://www.axis.com/blog/secure-insights/what-smart-city/smart-cities-infrastructure-iot-wide/
Introduction and Background • 20.4 billion IoT devices in use by 2020: Gartner[1] • 68% of the world population in urban areas by 2050: UN [2] • Be ready for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Recovery (HADR). • Multi-agency co-operation. • Multi-device and multi-technology collaboration. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/05/-sp-stormproofing-the-city-new-york-hurricane-sandy-natural-disasters
Issues in HADR Context • Heterogeneous nature of protocols and standard used by ICT assets. • Network protocolusage • Data exchange mechanisms or standards, Ontologies, Models • Service Modelling based on Service Oriented Approach (SOA) • Ontologies defining interactions between assets. • Interoperability issues between public (E.x city, private) and non-public domains (E.x Police, Military) • Gaps in the Situational Awareness (SA) picture.
Issues in HADR Context High Level Architecture for HADR Operations Interoperability in a Smart City Environment
Objectives and Entailed Scientific Work ”The objective is to propose a unified, extendable and abstract framework for systems integration. This framework is to be deployed in actual proof-of-concepts and pilot deployments to ensure interoperability, which needs to be evaluated in the Smart City and IoT context”. • Device an architecture to enable data and semantic interoperability between the non-public ICT domain and, the IoT and Smart City domains. • Preventextendeddiscoveryandconfiguration of the involved systems for HADR ops.
Objectives and Entailed Scientific Work • Analyse: • Smart City ICT Infrastructures • Availableservices, data, APIs andaccessibledevices • Current state and future directions of IoTdomain • Existingnon-public ICT systems • Methods and mechanisms identified will be applied against several components of Smart City and non-public (ex. military) ICT systems. • Pilot implementations would provide the proof of the investigations, the approach used and the solutions being proposed to counter these challenges.
Milestones • Architecturedeliverable. • Integration Framework deliverable. • Implementation System deliverable.
Example Pilot and Demonstration Demonstration Set-upfor Smart City HADR Scenario
References https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2015-12-07-gartner-says-smart-cities-will-use-1-billion-connected-things-in-2016 https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html