1 / 3

Reporting results

Reporting results. Results should: Be representative of the program Address each component of Quality Principle I Be disaggregated by subcategory when aggregated presentation masks differences Provide context (frequency counts, ranks percentages, percentiles, high/low scores, etc ).

wes
Download Presentation

Reporting results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reporting results Results should: • Be representative of the program • Address each component of Quality Principle I • Be disaggregated by subcategory when aggregated presentation masks differences • Provide context (frequency counts, ranks percentages, percentiles, high/low scores, etc) CAEP Conference

  2. Expanded information for continuing accreditation • Provide a report on how the plan for future and on-going inquiry worked out • Report any evidence that activities of the Quality Control System improved something in the program • How evidence promised “For Future Use” in Appendix E has been addressed • Program’s response to any weaknesses cited at the time of accreditation CAEP Conference

  3. Discussion and Plan • Announce conclusions about each of the claims made about Quality Principle 1 • Explain what results mean to the program • Describe how past decisions were influenced by evidence of candidate learning • Briefly outline steps for continued inquiry CAEP Conference

More Related