130 likes | 308 Views
The Revised Bathing Water Directive. Roger Inverarity & Grace Wong, Environment Agency, North East Region. Topics to Cover. Reasons for a new Directive What it includes UK position What it means for the North East. rBWD (2006). 30 years since current Directive (1976)
E N D
The Revised Bathing Water Directive Roger Inverarity & Grace Wong, Environment Agency, North East Region
Topics to Cover • Reasons for a new Directive • What it includes • UK position • What it means for the North East
rBWD (2006) • 30 years since current Directive (1976) • Identify & monitor bathing waters • Imperative and Guideline standards • Heavy fines • £3bn sewerage infrastructure improvements • Highest microbial compliance in EU • Technology and understanding • Diffuse pollution not tackled
rBWD implications • Focus on protecting public health • Change to monitoring & assessment • Predicting & responding to short-term pollution • Multi-agency / partnership approach to tackle diffuse pollution
rBWD implications (cont) • Public information & choice • Bathing water profiles • Signage • Beach Management measures • Engagement with stakeholders and public
rBWD implications (cont) • New classification • Four classes (Excellent, Good, Sufficient, Poor) • Based on revised parameters • “Good” is equivalent to the old “Guideline” • “Sufficient” is tighter than the old “Imperative” • UK target (after public consultation) is to meet “Sufficient” by 2015 • ….. and “No Deterioration”
Improvement Plans • To ensure beaches meet “Sufficient” by 2015 • Northumbrian Water have funding for improvements at Spittal, Newbiggin North and Blyth South • … and investigations at Cullercoats, Seaham and Saltburn • Yorkshire Water have funding to improve their infrastructure so that beaches meet “Excellent”