1 / 10

Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark Kristian Kidholm Mette Birk-Olsen Janne Buck Christensen

Systematic review of the informational needs of hospital decision-makers on investments in health technologies. Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark Kristian Kidholm Mette Birk-Olsen Janne Buck Christensen Anne Mette Ølholm. Objectives & key activities. AdHopHTA :

whitley
Download Presentation

Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark Kristian Kidholm Mette Birk-Olsen Janne Buck Christensen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Systematic review of the informational needs of hospital decision-makers on investments in health technologies Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark Kristian Kidholm Mette Birk-Olsen Janne Buck Christensen Anne Mette Ølholm

  2. Objectives & key activities AdHopHTA: To strengthen the use and impact of high-quality HTA in hospital settings WP 2: Are hospital-based HTA products “fit for purpose”? Do they include the information needed by hospital decision-makers? Are they of sufficient quality? Methods: Systematic literature review of empirical studies Qualitative, in-depth interviews with hospital decision-makers Questionnaire to a sample of hospital decision-makers in Europe Quality analysis of hospital-based HTA products www.adhophta.eu

  3. Methods – literature review Empirical studies Language: English or Danish Year: 2000-2012 Databases: PubMed Embase Cochrane Library Web of Science www.adhophta.eu

  4. Review proces www.adhophta.eu

  5. Results 74 unique criteria identified: www.adhophta.eu

  6. Results www.adhophta.eu

  7. Studies of relative importance www.adhophta.eu

  8. Conclusions Hospital decision-makers are able to describe their informational needs The domains of EUnetHTA’s Core Model cover most of the informational needs, but a tenth domain covering political and strategic issues was identified as well The relative importance that hospital decision-makers assign to the different criteria is rarely examined directly (n = 3) Not all criteria/domains are of equal importance to hospital decision-makers – clinical, economic and political/strategic aspects occur most frequently in our literature review. The importance of clinical and economic aspects is confirmed in studies of relative importance – they are consistently valued among top 3 by hospital decision-makers. Information on the social and ethical aspects were rarely considered most important. www.adhophta.eu

  9. Implications Adjustment of guidelines for HB-HTA? www.adhophta.eu

  10. Questions and comments? Thank you  www.adhophta.eu

More Related