1 / 14

2013 Accountability System

2013 Accountability System. 2013 Accountability Ratings. Index 1: Student Achievement. Provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory achievement across all subjects for all students:. Most similar to previous system. Index 2: Student Progress.

whoopi-estrada
Download Presentation

2013 Accountability System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2013 Accountability System

  2. 2013 Accountability Ratings

  3. Index 1: Student Achievement Provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory achievement across all subjects for all students: • Most similar to previous system

  4. Index 2: Student Progress Focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners: • Detailed information about the STAAR progress measure is online at • http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/.

  5. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups: • The STAAR weighted performance rate calculation must be modified for 2013 because STAAR Level III advanced performance cannot be included in the indicator until 2014.

  6. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Highlights the importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school: • Only high schools were included this year

  7. System Safeguards • Reporting system will disaggregate performance by student group and subject area. • Performance rates are calculated from the assessment results used to calculate performance rates in Index 1. Writing Special Ed ELL

  8. Distinction Designations

  9. “Highest of Honors” • Campuses only [statutory requirement] • Eligibility criteria – Met Standard rating [statutory requirement]

  10. Distinction Designations • Four Step Framework: • Determine Campus Comparison Group of 40 (unique to each campus) • Identify Top 25% by Comparing Performance to the Group (each indicator) • Determine the Percent of Indicators in Top Quartile for the Campus • Identify Campuses that Meet or Exceed Distinction Targets

  11. Academic Achievement in Reading/ELA • Recognize outstanding academic achievement in reading/English language arts: 13 campuses

  12. Academic Achievement in Math • Recognize outstanding academic achievement in math: 13 campuses

  13. Top 25% Student Progress • Campuses in the top 25% (top quartile) of their campus comparison group on Index 2: Student Progress score are eligible for a distinction designation for student progress. 14 campuses

  14. 2013 Accountability Ratings

More Related