190 likes | 292 Views
Prevalence and predictors of mental disorders in an injured emergency centre population: a cross-sectional study. Claire van der Westhuizen , Dan J. Stein, Gail Wyatt, John Williams, Katherine Sorsdahl. Presentation outline.
E N D
Prevalence and predictors of mental disorders in an injured emergency centre population: a cross-sectional study Claire van der Westhuizen, Dan J. Stein, Gail Wyatt, John Williams, Katherine Sorsdahl
Presentation outline • Introduction: Why explore mental disorder in injured patients? • Objectives • Methods • Results/discussion • Limitations • Conclusion
Mental health • Injury Risk factors Depression 2% of DALYs (no. 10) Interpersonal violence 6.5% of DALYs (no. 2) Influences SA Burden of disease
Why explore mental disorder in injured EC patients? What we know (HICs) What we don’t know (LMICs) Mental disorders in EC ??? (substance use only) Past trauma and community violence??? Recurrent injuries??? • Injured patients = at-risk group for mental disorder, especially intentional injuries (Dicker et al, 2011; O’Donnell et al, 2009) • EC patients ++ past trauma and community violence (Cunningham et al, 2006) • Recurrent injury HIC (Sims et al, 1989; Worrell et al, 2006)
Objectives • To determine the prevalence of mental disorders in intentionally and unintentionally injured ambulant emergency centre patients • To determine the sociodemographic, injury and psychological predictors of mental disorder in this group
Methods - 1 • Sites: Elsies River CHC and Khayelitsha Hospital • N=200 injured patients, convenience sample • Intentional: assault injuries • Unintentional: included road traffic, burns, falls etc • Exclusion criteria: <18 years old, self-inflicted injuries, serious injury, unable to give informed consent
Methods - 2 • Sociodemographics and injury/violence history • Structured psychiatric diagnostic interview (MINI) • Trauma History Questionnaire (THQ) • Analysis: • Prevalence of mental disorders • Chi-square test: differences between intentionally injured and unintentionally injured groups • Logistic regression: predictors of mental disorder
Results: prevalence of mental disorders South Africa *includes suicidality High risk group
Three logistic regression models AOD and mental disorder
Logistic regression models • Substance use disorders: male, high levels of witnessed community violence • Comorbid substance and other mental disorder: high levels of witnessed community violence
Findings Similar Different Recurrent intentional injury predicted current mental disorder Community violence plays a role in adult patients (mostly studied in adolescents) Witnessed community violence is a stronger predictor than cumulative trauma burden • High frequencies of past trauma and witnessed community violence in this group • Linked to mental disorders
Limitations • Generalisable? • Convenience sampling • Mental disorders under-sampled • Self-report, hospital data
Conclusion - 1 Injured EC patients are an at-risk group: - mental disorder - lifetime trauma - witnessed violence
Conclusion - 2 Targeted psychosocial interventions Decrease mental health Rx gap Injury prevention
Conclusion - 3 Investigation and intervention required in many settings EC research and intervention
Thank you • Staff of Elsies River and Khayelitsha facilities • Katherine Sorsdahl • Phodisoprogramme • Today’s audience