1 / 11

Today’s session

Today’s session. Later on, I will be giving you a lecture on this. But first, I want you to use your psychological skills of interpretation and evaluation to anticipate what I’m going to tell you. Is there a gene for crime?. No. There isn’t. ‘Lombrosian’ view:

wilfred
Download Presentation

Today’s session

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Today’s session

  2. Later on, I will be giving you a lecture on this. But first, I want you to use your psychological skills of interpretation and evaluation to anticipate what I’m going to tell you.

  3. Is there a gene for crime?

  4. No. There isn’t. • ‘Lombrosian’ view: • Single defective gene responsible • Modern behavioural genetics: • Polygenetic influences • Complex interactions with environment • No assumption of defect

  5. Two questions • Is there a genetic influence on crime? • Family history studies • Twin studies • Adoption studies • If so, how does the influence operate?

  6. Family history studies • Osborne & West (1982) • Father has a criminal conviction – 40% of sons do • Father has no criminal conviction – 13% of sons do • Consistent with genetic influence • Also with learning/environment • Suggests genes do not determine criminality

  7. Twin studies • Early studies strongly suggested genetic influence but flaws in sampling, determining zygocity. • More recently: • Christiansen (1977): MZ 35%; DZ 13% • Dalgard & Kringlen (1976): MZ 26%; DZ 15% • Low MZ concordances – influence not strong • Confounding effects of more similar treatment for MZ

  8. Adoption studies • Generally found that adopted children more similar to biological than adoptive parents. • Supports genetic hypothesis but: • Issue of what is being inherited (e.g. alcoholism) • Could be prenatal influences, not genetic • Age at adoption – early influences?

  9. What is being inherited? • Hollin (1992) gives three suggestions: • Abnormal CNS e.g. Low IQ; ADHD • Abnormal ANS e.g. Lack of responsiveness • Abnormal endocrine e.g. Influence of testosterone • Difficult to resolve because of enormous complexity of interactions • Lots of biological correlates of criminality; few obvious causes.

  10. Which bits had you already worked out? • Which bits were new or unexpected given your own interpretation?

More Related