1 / 21

DELIBERATIONS

DRAFT AUDITING PROFESSION BILL. DELIBERATIONS. National Treasury: Republic of South Africa 17 October 2005. Contents. Background & History of the Profession Role of auditors Interested Parties Common issues raised in public hearings Treasury’s view Main areas of disagreement

willem
Download Presentation

DELIBERATIONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DRAFT AUDITING PROFESSION BILL DELIBERATIONS National Treasury: Republic of South Africa 17 October 2005 1

  2. Contents • Background & History of the Profession • Role of auditors • Interested Parties • Common issues raised in public hearings • Treasury’s view • Main areas of disagreement • Conclusion 2

  3. Background • PAAA enacted in 1951 • Protecting public interest main object of that Act • Minister handed the regulation to the profession – de facto self regulation • Amended 40 years since, in 1991 • Discussions on improving it since early nineties 3

  4. History (1) • Great depression impact on the profession • Oil price crisis in early seventies • US authorities question – self regulation practices • Increase competition, increase of non-audit services • Audit overtaken by non-audit services in contributing to revenues of firms • Authorities warn of impact to independence of auditors 4

  5. History (2) • Firms compete on prices for audit work and solicitation of clients intensifies • Low-balling develops into practice • Firms consolidate from “big 8” to “big 4” • Fall of the Soviet union & emergence of globalisation • Standards of accounting & auditing harmonised • Culture & character of profession changes 5

  6. Role of Auditors (1) • Corporate failures world wide infuse urgency in SA legislative reform • Public interest the focal issue • Auditor independence & some practices questioned • Profession admits consulting impairs independence • Increased focus on risk management- but often skewed perspective 6

  7. Interested Parties • Expression of opinion – on AFS • Shareholders including pension funds • Workers in client companies • Creditors and other investors • Governments 7

  8. Focus of this Bill • Enhance integrity of the profession • Protection of the Public interest • Enhance independence & effectiveness of the regulator • Enhance independence of auditors • Ensure the RB is accountable • Hold auditors accountable • Ensure equitable access to profession 8

  9. Common Issues (1) • Definition of Audit • Reportable irregularity • Education & training • Character of the RB • Section 44 • Disciplinary procedure • Limitation of liability 9

  10. Common Issues (2) • Disciplinary procedure • Other issues • Multi Disciplinary Partnerships 10

  11. Definition of Audit • Not in accordance with IFAC • Part b of the definition • Use of audit services somewhat confusing • Act should focus on regulating external auditing only 11

  12. Reportable irregularity • Definition too wide – any unlawful act • Reporting process cumbersome • Materiality preferably should refer to entity • Otherwise dishonest • Revert to S20(5) of PAAA • Penalty is harsh • Overlapping reporting with other legislations • PAIA 12

  13. Education & Training • Referee & a player - exams • Withdrawing of recognition of educational institutions on students • Alternative supervisory arrangement on training contracts • Partial accreditation • Accreditation every five years • New syllabus required 13

  14. Character of RB • No guarantee RA will be in the RB • 4 + 1 representation of RA’s • Funding of RB – independence & reciprocity • Minimum representation of RA’s in DC • No room made for academics in the standards and ethics • Powers of RB to issue rules • Standard setting & ethics committee > separate bodies 14

  15. Section 44 • Fair representation not the same as fair presentation • Provisions archaic • Drop section or mention all audit procedures • Truthfulness and correctness • Materiality on testing existence of A&L • Conflict of interest – two year rule, ethics code • Including annexure • Term “without any restriction” 15

  16. Limitation of Liability • Align with audit only • Allow for limitation non-audit engagements • Proportionate liability 16

  17. Disciplinary Procedure • Make it a regulation • Allow for simpler process for minor cases • Consent orders • Decisions of DC not to be revoked by RB • Right of appeal • Self incriminating evidence • Right to remain silent • Subpoena powers for investigation committee 17

  18. Other issues • Renewal of registration • Consent to employ people refused registration • Public interest company - inspection • Confidentiality of information - inspections • Nominated auditor vs engagement partner • Erosion of audit profession • Transitional provisions – limit to one year • Section 41 – potentially confusing terms 18

  19. Multi Disciplinary Practice • Partnership • Sharing of profits 19

  20. Conclusion • Thanks to all the presenters and hoping the committee will ensure the intention of the policy is carried out in the resultant legislation 20

  21. THANK YOUANY QUESTIONS? 21

More Related