60 likes | 178 Views
SCT Simulation for CTB2004 - Status Report. Peter Kodys, Zdenka Broklova, Thijs Corn el issen, Carlos Escobar. Special thanks to Grant Gorfine, Pavel Nevski, Pavel Reznicek, Sasha Rozanov, Manuel Torreira, Vakho Tsulaia and many others f or their help. History.
E N D
SCT Simulation for CTB2004- Status Report Peter Kodys,Zdenka Broklova, Thijs Cornelissen, Carlos Escobar Special thanks to Grant Gorfine, Pavel Nevski, Pavel Reznicek, Sasha Rozanov, Manuel Torreira, Vakho Tsulaia and many others for their help. Zdeňka Broklová
History • December 03: - familiarize withAthena,simulations and NOVA database • January 04: - creation ofendcap modules and testbeam geometric setup • February 04: - simulation and digitization: geometric setupG4 hits digits spacing tracking Zdeňka Broklová
SCT_TestBeamDetDescr • prepare new geometric description of endcap modules • more realistic hybrid shape • two sensors on each side • adding subspines • improved precision of description • set right materials now it is integrated in SCT_GeoModel • description of module and additional blocks position(all number come from NOVA database) • geometric setup of various testbeams (May2003, Sep2003, CTB2004) Zdeňka Broklová
From simulation to tracks … thanks to Manuel • CTB envelopes • Geo2G4 conversion • G4 simulation (SCT_G4) • digitization (SCT_Digitization) • spacing+clusterization(InDetRecAlgs) • tracking (SCT_TestBeamAlgs) Zdeňka Broklová
Conclusion • whole sequenceseems to be working (in athena 7.5.0) • standard packages are being used • we know how to run it and make changes • up to now it hasn’t been much stable (due to massive development) hopefully it will be better Our status and results are summarized onhttp://ific.uv.es/~cescobar/simulation.html Zdeňka Broklová
Outlook • verification (March) • simulation of older testbeams and result comparisons • CTB 2004 tuning in far future: • follow reality reaction to real CTB conditions - comparison with real data Zdeňka Broklová