1 / 17

REASON

REASON. Daniella Silva, Jessica de Medeiros, Sebastian Salomón, Sebastian Ríos, Vincenzo Calvi, Antonella Busato , Heechae Chon. INTRODUCTION. Sherlock Holmes: ‘crime is common, logic is rare’  Using reason to go beyond the immediate evidence of our senses

willow
Download Presentation

REASON

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. REASON Daniella Silva, Jessica de Medeiros, Sebastian Salomón, Sebastian Ríos, Vincenzo Calvi, Antonella Busato, HeechaeChon

  2. INTRODUCTION • Sherlock Holmes: ‘crime is common, logic is rare’  • Using reason to go beyond the immediate evidence of our senses • Saving time by inferring from something you already know • Assumptions = premises • Rationalism = reason as a source of knowledge • Discovering truths about reality through reason alone (math/logic) • Recognizing that senses can easily mislead us

  3. 3 kinds of reasoning: • deductive reasoning • inductive reasoning • informal reasoning • Fallacies – invalid patterns of reasoning

  4. DEDUCTIVE REASONING • Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular • Syllogisms • Two premises and conclusion • Three terms, each occurring twice • Quantifiers • Defining Truth and Validity • Truth = property of statements • Validity = property of arguments (whether conclusions follow logically from premises) • Structure of Arguments • As long as structure is valid, argument is valid • Analyzing structure helps avoid belief bias • Belief Bias = tendency to belief that an argument is valid just because we agree with the conclusion

  5. What about Truth? • Just because an argument is valid, does not mean conclusion is true • In order for conclusion to be true: premises must be true and argument must be valid • Example: • Socrates is mortal, since all men are mortal. • It is evident that a tacitly understood claim is that Socrates is a man. The fully expressed reasoning is thus: Since all men are mortal and Socrates is a man, Socrates is mortal. • In this example, “all men are mortal” and “Socrates is a man” are the premises, while “Socrates is mortal” is the conclusion. • Enthymemes • Incomplete argument where one premise is not stated because it is obvious

  6. INDUCTIVE REASONING • It is opposite to deductive reasoning • It goes from the particular to the general • It moves from the observed to the unobserved • You reason inductively thousands of times a day • Examples:   • “Since my neighbor’s dog was friendly to me in the past, he will not bite me today” • “Since apples nourished me in the past, I assume that they will nourish me in the future” • “Since my chair supported my weight in the past, it will support me today”

  7. How Reliable is it? • We cannot always rely on it • Induction goes beyond immediate evidence of our senses • Too much generalizations • You jump to conclusions without enough evidence • This is called confirmation bias

  8. INFORMAL REASONING • Informal reasoning is related to fallacies which are false ideas or beliefs, especially one that a lot of people believe is true. • There are several types of informal reasoning like ad ignorantiam, ad hominem, circular reasoning, special pleading, post hoc ergo propter hoc, equivocation, false analogy, false dilemma, and loaded question.

  9. SPECIFIC EXAMPLES • Circular reasoning: Assuming the truth of what you are supposed to be proving. • Example: ‘I know that Jesus was the son of god because he said he was, and the son of god would not lie’

  10. Equivocation: using language ambiguously. • Example: ‘A feather is light. • What is light cannot be dark. • Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.’ • Loaded question: A question that is biased because it contains built-in assumption. • Example: ‘Do you always cheat in exams?’ Both yes/no answers could imply something. • Special pleading: using double standards to excuse an individual or group. • Example: ‘I know there is a drought on and we should save water, but I am putting my prize flowers in a competition next week and they need plenty of water.

  11. REASONING AND CERTAINTY • Cannot rely on reason to give us knowledge • As a way of thinking, logical reasoning cannot be doubted. • The law of identity • The law of non-contradiction • The law of the excluded middle • All proof must end somewhere • Infinite regress: A sequence of reasoning that can never come to an end.

  12. Lawofidentity

  13. Lawof non-contradiction

  14. Lawoftheexcludedmiddle

  15. CONCLUSION • Reason is a way of knowing that can give us certainty • Three types: inductive, deductive, informal • This belief may bring serious doubt • Reason is a double-edged tool • We become trapped in the “prison of logic” and this can stifle our creativity • Someone too rationale may come across as cold and “annoying” • Sometimes empathy and understanding helps solve an argument in a relationship rather than using logic and reason • Reason needs to be balanced by emotion

  16. BIBLIOGRAPHY • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkajIoi77BU&feature=channel • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2wj4Lk07RE&feature=channel • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

More Related