300 likes | 430 Views
Persuasion. Persuasion. Basic Definition:. Ethical attempt to alter BAVAs. Operational Definition:. Gain acceptance of your proposal. Directed attitude change. To CWD. Persuasion. : Types of Attitude Change. 2. 1. VSA SA A N D DS VSD. 2. 1. 2. 1.
E N D
Persuasion Basic Definition: Ethical attempt to alter BAVAs Operational Definition: Gain acceptance of your proposal Directed attitude change To CWD
Persuasion : Types of Attitude Change 2 1 VSA SA A N D DS VSD 2 1 2 1 VSA SA A N D DS VSD VSA SA A N D DS VSD
Persuasion : Proving your Points Toulmin Model of Logical Reasoning Desired end result Claim: value believe act Propositions Purpose Statement
Toulmin Model of Logical Reasoning Claim: Purpose Statement Warrant: General support for Claim Major Arguments Main points of Outline
Toulmin Model of Logical Reasoning Claim: Purpose Statement Warrant: General support for Claim Data: Specific support for Warrant Relevant Novel Credible
Toulmin Model : Outline Format Claim: Purpose Statement I. Warrant: A. Data: B. Data: II. Warrant: A. Data: B. Data:
Persuasion : What are my Points? Claim: Desired end result believe value act Propositions Fact Value Policy
Persuasion : Proposition of Fact Goal: Prove statement is true or false Examples: The U.S. economy is in a recession The U.S. economy is not in a recession Key Words: Is/is not (true/false)
Persuasion : Proposition of Fact How do you PROVE it? Preponderance of Evidence More facts Better facts Can have a “Final Answer”
Persuasion : Proposition of Value Goal: Accept a value judgment “+/-” Examples: A recession is good for the economy A recession is bad for the economy Key Words: good/bad, right/wrong, etc
Persuasion : Proposition of Value How do you PROVE it? Set a Decision Standard Apply the Standard
Persuasion : Proposition of Value Yes/moral Aud dec std No/notmoral Requested Action And Reasons Yes/moral Bill’s dec std No/notmoral
Persuasion : Proposition of Value Requested Action And Reasons NEW Aud dec std Yes/moral No/notmoral Yes/moral Bill’s dec std No/notmoral
Persuasion : Proposition of Policy Goal: Advocate an Action “to do” Examples: The Bush tax reform act should be passed The Bush tax reform act should not be passed Key Words: should/would (do something)
Persuasion : Proposition of Policy How do you PROVE it? Problem Exists Problem is Serious – “Harm” Solution - Solvency Policy Superiority Better, cheaper, faster Few alts > point-by-point Many alts > “lump & dump”
Persuasion : Strategic Persuasion 1) FACTS versus EMOTIONS New Atts New Atts Changes Old NOT change Old Long Term Short Term Default: FACT or COMBINE
Persuasion : Strategic Persuasion 2) PRIMACY versus RECENCY Hybrid Pure Hostile Aud Favorable Aud Quality Quantity Default: PRIMACY
Persuasion : Strategic Persuasion 3) ONE SIDED vs TWO SIDED Uninformed Informed Isolated Aud Controversial Topic Refutational Default: TWO SIDED
Persuasion : Strategic Persuasion 4) IMPLIED versus STATED CONCL Few Alts Many Alts Motivated Aud Prop of VALUE Prop of POLICY Default: STATED
Persuasion : Strategic Persuasion Basic Starting Strategy: 1) Facts must be used 2) Primacy Hybrid 3)Two-Sided Refutational 4) Stated Conclusion
ELM: the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion “Persuaders don’t persuade, they stimulate you to persuade yourself” Basic Strategy: to increase the likelihood of positive elaborations Two Elaborative Paths : Central Peripheral
ELM: Which path to take? Audience INVOLVEMENT on the ISSUE Issue Involvement - + Central Peripheral
ELM: the CENTRAL path … the Logical/Rational route … Direct and Long lasting New attitude
ELM: Using the CENTRAL path Issue Involvement + Initial reaction Salience Credibility Good style Central Motivation To Process Clear structure Quality arguments Repetition Good style Capacity To Process
ELM: the Peripheral path … the Emotional/nonrational route … Indirect and Short term New attitude Cue
ELM: Using the Peripheral path Consistency Theory: do the links make sense? Balance Theory: the ‘product’ must be ‘positive’ New attitude Cue
Using Fear Appeals Fear motivates change change L M H E Level of fear
Effective Fear Appeals: Terror Management Theory Creating Fear through TMT: Perceived as really fearful change Not easily discredited Credible L M H E Level of fear
Effective Fear Appeals: Terror Management Theory Resolving Fear through TMT: Fear is uncomfortable change Act to reduce fear Solution must be: L M H E immediate Level of fear complete safe