170 likes | 336 Views
POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND BUDGETTING. A CASE STUDY ON WORK DONE IN WARD-60 (SAGAYAPURAM) BY : A.SIVASANKARAN, JAGO FEDERATION. 1. DETAILS. WHY Participatory Planning and Budgeting was required in Ward-60?
E N D
POWER POINT PRESENTATION ON PARTICIPATORY PLANNING AND BUDGETTING. A CASE STUDY ON WORK DONE IN WARD-60 (SAGAYAPURAM) BY : A.SIVASANKARAN, JAGO FEDERATION.
1. DETAILS • WHY Participatory Planning and Budgeting was required in Ward-60? • WHAT is Participatory Planning and Budgeting? • HOW was it done? • OUTCOME of the excersize. • IMPACT on Ward Development. • Difficulties encountered and how they were overcome. • Lessons learnt. • Conclusions • Thanks.
2. Why Participatory Planning and Budgeting was required? • 1. Unequal levels of developments within Ward. • 2. BBMP Ward Work List tilted towards influential groups. • 3. Contractors influencing Ward Work List preparation. • 4. Lack of Leadership in Low Income Localities. • 5. Corrupt practices in Estimation, Tendering and Execution. • 6. Lack of Citizen Involvement hence low quality of Work. • 7. Total and sustained Citizen Involvement is the Solution.
3. What is Participatory Planning and Budgeting. • Citizen Involvement in Planning. • List out the Wish List. • Estimate Cost. • Prepare Priority Lists. • Submit to BBMP through the Corporator. • Follow up with all concerned. • Check Ward Work List and confirm items.
4. How was Participatory Planning and Budgeting organized in Ward-60. • 1. Strategy Planning. • 2. Involvement of all sections. • 3. Street Meetings in Low Income Areas. • 4. Preparation of Development needs. • 5. Estimating Cost of each item. • 6. Prioritization. • 7. Budget Proposal Preparation. • 8. Submit Proposals to BBMP through the Corporator.
5. Outcomes from the Participatory Planning and Budgeting Work. • 1. Better understanding between groups. • 2. Poor getting due attention. • 3. Emergence of Local Leadership. • 4. Monitoring of work in each locality. • 5. Social Auditing of cost and Time Over-runs. • 6.BetterBBMP and other Agencies awareness. • 7. Equitable development within Ward.
6. IMPACT. • 1. Awareness of Responsibilities. • 2. Social Auditing of Ward Works. • 3. Better execution of Works, Monitoring. • 4. Better utilisation of available resources. • 5. Corporator and Engineers are more responsive.
7. Difficulties and Remedies. • 1.Cynisysm of all stakeholders. • Patient and sustained interactions. • 2. Non-Cooperation by Corporator & BBMP. • Common approach and Strength in Nos. • 3. Class conciousness. • Honest and non-partisan approach by Federation of Civil Society Members.
8. Lessons Learnt. • 1. Positive approach bring positive results. • 2. Leadership is not exclusive, but inclusive. • 3. Sustainable social interaction. • 4. Officers and Field Staff of BBMP are capable of better delivery of Services. • 5. Unity between stake holders is the key.
9. Conclusions. • 1. The Case Study must be documented for reference by other Ward-Activists. • 2. Recomendations from BBMP and Former Lokayuktha for the proposed Document. • 3. Wide Publicity to enthuse other Ward Activists.
10. THANKS. • The Federation of Civil Societies of Sagayapuram Ward-60,Jago Federation and CIVIC express their thanks to each every one of you for the patient hearing and interest taken in their work in Participatory Planning and Budgeting. • -----------------------------------------------