130 likes | 257 Views
Trade Policies, Market Structure, and Manufacturing Sector Performance in Malawi over the period 1967-2002. Hopestone Kayiska Chavula Macroeconomic Policy Division Economic Commission for Africa Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. African Economic Conference, 28th-30th October 2013, Johannesburg, RSA.
E N D
Trade Policies, Market Structure, and Manufacturing Sector Performance in Malawi over the period 1967-2002 Hopestone Kayiska Chavula Macroeconomic Policy Division Economic Commission for Africa Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. African Economic Conference, 28th-30th October 2013, Johannesburg, RSA.
Contents • Introduction. • Economic policy regimes and manufacturing performance. • Price mark-ups, trade and market structure hypotheses. • Methodology and data. • Empirical results. • Conclusions.
Introduction • Like many African countries Mw has gone through episodes of economic performance over the years; • However, it is observed to have performed relatively better in the first fifteen years after independence than the other periods; • Malawi’s manufacturing sector has remained relatively small and underdeveloped, and its performance remains dismal; • The paper tries to evaluate the impact of changes in economic policies and market structure on the performance of the manufacturing sector in Malawi.
Price-cost margins and manufacturing output growth rate trends – 1967-2002
Price mark-ups, trade and market structure hypotheses • Debate on competition and market structure in firm/industry performance; • Inputs availability (Mw) play a significant ro in the performance of industry/firm; • Increase in demand has a positive impact on performance; • Imports lead to low p-cost margins due to increased competition; • Export market tends to compel monopolists (oligopolists) to be more competitive in pricing;
MethodologyandData • Y=price-cost margin (performance) • MC=market concentration • X=vector of factors determining conjectures • B= vector of barriers to entry • e=elasticity of demand • p=policy variables
Methodologycont…. ; ; DU = dummy variables for structural breaks Fink= finance working capital ,
Data • Firm level panel data from NSO through NES , 1967-2002; • 141 firms under 14 four digit ISIC industries; • Exports and imports are at industry level.
Empirical Results • 1st carried out the Clemente-Montanes-Reyes unit root test to establish structural breaks; • Results showed significant structural breaks in • 1982 : LR effect of economic instability before adopting SAPs • 1991: could be due to accumulation and continued effects of SAPs. • Dummy variables were constructed based on these structural breaks to capture the policy effects on performance.
Empirical results cont….. • Policy changes and strategies led to two significant structural breaks (in 1982 and 1991) • Mainly attributed to the country’s economic crisis in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and the accumulation and continued effects of the SAPs; • Price-cost margin increased with the degree of market concentration in an industry; • Imports and exports are found to have a negative and significant impact on the firms’ performance in line with economic theory especially during the import substitution/protectionist and post-liberalisation periods.
Conclusions • International trade has considerable impact on domestic profitability looking at the effects of import and export intensity; • Calling for export performance enhancing policies and import discipline; • Emphasis on technological transfer of emerging technologies, the associated knowledge and expertise; • Deliberate efforts to enhance the availability of factor inputs (raw materials, skilled labour & financing capital & access to loanable funds).