1 / 24

FORWARD THINKING: PREPARING OUR YOUTH FOR THE COMING WORLD OCTOBER 24 - 25, 2011 

Changing Contexts and Moving Targets: Assessing Positive Peer Influences on Mental Health Across Developmental Transitions. FORWARD THINKING: PREPARING OUR YOUTH FOR THE COMING WORLD OCTOBER 24 - 25, 2011  University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia.

winter
Download Presentation

FORWARD THINKING: PREPARING OUR YOUTH FOR THE COMING WORLD OCTOBER 24 - 25, 2011 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Changing Contexts and Moving Targets: Assessing Positive Peer Influences on Mental Health Across Developmental Transitions FORWARD THINKING: PREPARING OUR YOUTH FOR THE COMING WORLD OCTOBER 24 - 25, 2011  University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia Bonnie Leadbeater, Jacqueline Homel, Kara Thompson and PaweenaSukhawathanakul

  2. Positive Peer Influences in Childhood • The quality of peer relationships in early childhood is associated with: • Greater levels of well-being (Holder & Coleman, 2009); • Lower levels of peer victimization (Ladd, 2006); • Greater school engagement (Perdue, et al. 2009)

  3. Positive Peer Influences in Adolescents on • Psychological adjustment (Hirsch & DuBois) • School engagement (Li, Lerner) • Civic engagement and volunteering (Youniss, Flanagan ) • Emotional distress (Newcomb & Bentler, Allen) • Substance use and delinquency (Prinstein & Boergers, Allen & Antonishak, Catalano, Hawkins, etc.) • Driving (Brown)

  4. Assessing Positive Peer Influences • Often assessed as individual traits • Friendship quality, • Reciprocated “best” friends • Emotional or social support, • Sociomemetric status (accepted, liked) • or the absence of associations with negative peer activities

  5. Assessment is complicated in longitudinal studies • Peer influences are broader than close friendships, • Peer networks change (often frequently) over time • Changes in contexts fuel changes in peer networks • Annual classroom re-organizations • School transitions: elementary to middle school create larger peer networks • Shifts in interest (giving up band for shop, joining a team) • Family moves • Developmental transitions (e. g. late adolescence to early adulthood) • Starting romantic relationships (often short term)

  6. Outline: To open discussion • I am going to BRIEFLY present two of our efforts to conceptualize peer influences over time: 1. A study of individual and classroom effects of social competence and social responsibility in first to third grade students 2. A study of emotional support and positive peer activities in a sample of youth 12 to 18 whom we have followed for 6 years across the transition to young adulthood .

  7. Study 1: Children in grades 1 to 3 • With the elementary school children, we assessed the mediating effects of individual and classroom levels of variables at the intersection of individual and peer relationships: Social competence and Social responsibility and their effects as mediators of the relationship between peer victimization and internalizing or aggression

  8. A WITS Program Evaluation Sample (www.witsprogram.ca)

  9. Measures: Its all about interactions Physical and Relational Victimization: Child Report: Social Experience Questionnaire Social Responsibility: Teacher Ratings • “Is friendly, caring, & helpful to others”; “Helps solve peer conflicts” Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC) Parent ratings • Aggression “Teases others”, “ “Threatens to hurt others” • Internalizing ‘‘Worries’’, ‘‘Appears unhappy, sad’’ • Social Competence • Social skills: “congratulates others when good things happen to them”, • Leadership:“is good at getting people to work together”, • Adaptability: “recovers quickly after a setback.” (Crick & Grotpeter, 1996; Leadbeater & Sukhawathanakul, 2011; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004)

  10. Assessing classroom levels • Classroom level scores were computed for each child as the average of his or her classmates’ • social competence and • social responsibility • i.e. without the influence of the child’s own score (following Kellam, Aber etc.)

  11. Effects of Victimization on Internalizing

  12. Effects of Victimization on Aggression

  13. Conclusion: quality of interactions matter • Children’s social competence with a variety of peers mediate the link between peer victimization and increases in mental health problems • Children’s socially responsible roles within classrooms may reduce the effects of victimization on internalization and aggression (by setting protective norms?) • Assessing classroom norms may require class level observational methods or annual renewal of sample to increase class size.

  14. Study 2: Assessing positive peer influences across the transition to young adulthood • Using an accelerated longitudinal design we computed the trajectories of • peer support and positive and negative activities with peers and anxiety symptoms We then asked • Whether initial levels and changes in peer support and peer activities predict changes in anxiety symptoms.

  15. Data from the Victoria Healthy Youth Survey

  16. Measures • Covariates Age, SES • Anxiety Symptoms • Brief Child and Family Phone Interview (Cunningham et al 2009) • Peer Emotional Support • e.g. ‘I rely on my friends for emotional support’ ‘My peers are good at helping me to solve problems

  17. Quality of interactions with peers • Positive Peer Activities • Difference between number of positive activities (playing sport, working hard in school, performing, church or spiritual groups) and negative activities (smoking, drinking & using drugs, gangs, panhandling). Higher values indicate more positive activities. • Mean number of activities averaged across all waves is controlled to remove effects of more activity from the difference score.

  18. Univariate trajectories of anxiety

  19. Univariatetrajectories of peer support β= .03

  20. Univariate trajectories of peer activities

  21. Figure 4: Association between peer support, peer activities and anxiety symptoms over time Anxiety T1 Anxiety T2 Anxiety T3 Anxiety T4 Coefficients for females are shown in parentheses 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 0 Slope -.08 (-.52*) Intercept -.11*(-.07)* Slope Slope Intercept Intercept 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 3 Support T2 Support T3 Support T4 Support T1 Activities T3 Activities T1 Activities T2 Activities T4

  22. Conclusions: Interactions matter • Social support is stable across the transition to young adulthood and adolescent levels predict levels of anxiety in females. • Opportunities for positive peer activities decline and negative activities increase over the transition to young adulthood. BUT • Higher levels of positive activities in adolescence predict declines in anxiety over time for boys and girls.

  23. Can we measure positive peer influences over time? • Peer (and romantic) relationships change frequently and vary systematically with context changes. • Assessing the effects of peer influences may need to take into account the values, beliefs and opportunities offered by the contexts of these influences – neighborhoods, schools, classrooms, colleges, residences, workplaces, etc. and the opportunities that these settings afford for positive interactions with peers.

  24. Thinking forward? • How can we tap positive peer interactions across developmental stages and changing contexts ? • How can we improve opportunities for the positive peer interactions at each developmental stage and across transitions ?

More Related