1 / 5

Memorandum of Understanding

Memorandum of Understanding. Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008. Purpose. Outlines responsibilities within the collaboration Leadership responsibilities, including safety responsibilities Institutional responsibilities Clearly states who will provide each element of the spectrometer

wmcdougal
Download Presentation

Memorandum of Understanding

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Memorandum of Understanding Paul E. Reimer 20 June 2008

  2. Purpose • Outlines responsibilities within the collaboration • Leadership responsibilities, including safety responsibilities • Institutional responsibilities • Clearly states who will provide each element of the spectrometer • This will represent a commitment on the part of each group to provide these elements/services/funds • Clearly states what we expect Fermilab to provide for the experiment • Equipment e.g. beam line, wire winding machine, KTeV magnet • Supplies e.g. power and cooling for magnets • Beam parameters and intensity • Estimates of cost • This document should be as specific as possible • I don’t want to get to 2010 and find myself saying, “I though you were doing that” Paul E. Reimer

  3. Time Line We are waiting on the MOU so that • Fermilab will have a clear path for working on the experiment • We can really start working on this experiment here at Fermilab • Funding Agencies will release money Fermilab has created a task force • Chaired by Dave Christian and Craig Moore • Regular meetings (but the—now ended—furlough program caused delays) • Evaluate costs and time line from Fermilab’s point of view • Focused on major cost—beam line Time Line • Hope to have Fermilab cost input by early July • Circulate draft in collaboration in early July • Final version in August? Am I too optimistic? Paul E. Reimer

  4. Sample Outline • Introduction—Physics goals, goals of MOU • Personnel and Institutions • Collaboration Leadership—Identify spokesperson, lines of responsibility • Current Collaboration—Lists all of you • Experimental Area and Beams • Experimental Area—KTeV Hall (NM4) • Proton Beam Structure and Intensity—Spot size, 2×1012/s, total proton • Collaboration’s Responsibilities • General Responsibilities of All Institutions—Do the experiment safely • Abilene Christian University—Hardware (hodoscopes), labor, MC work • Argonne National Laboratory • Los Alamos National Laboratory • And on through the collaboration Paul E. Reimer

  5. Sample outline • Fermilab’s Responsibilities • Accelerator Division—e.g. Beam line • Particle Physics Division—e.g. KTeV Hall, magnet assembly • Computing Division—electronics, disk storage, networks, computing farms (?) • Cost and Schedule—What the costs are and from where the money is expected • Special Considerations • During Construction, Installation, and Operation of the Experiment • At the Completion of the Experiment—We agree to clean up our mess • Publications and Reviews—We agree to publish our results and we agree to help Fermilab in various reviews Paul E. Reimer

More Related