1 / 23

Optimal Fixation Techniques in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Approach

Learn when and how to fix mesh in ventral/incisional hernia repair to prevent recurrence, chronic pain, adhesion formation, and other complications. Compare techniques like permanent tackers, resorbable sutures, and laparoscopic repairs. Research evidence on operative time, pain, and recurrence rates. Understand the importance of mesh defect area ratios and mesh overlap for successful outcomes. Stay updated with the latest findings to enhance surgical outcomes in hernia repair.

word
Download Presentation

Optimal Fixation Techniques in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lars Nannestad Jorgensen MD DrMScFACS Professor Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital University of Copenhagen Denmark When and how to fix the meshin ventral / incisionalherniarepair?

  2. Disclosures Educationalactivities & speaker’sfee: BARD & Medtronic

  3. IPOM Open repair Sublay Onlay Fixation Permanent Tackers Resorbable Laparoscopicrepair IPOM Sutures Sublay Glue

  4. Optimal fixationprevents • recurrence • acute and chronicpain • adhesion formation • mesh migration • shrinkage • infection • fistulae • seroma

  5. Fixation Permanent Tackers Resorbable Laparoscopicrepair IPOM Sutures Glue

  6. Tack vs. suturefixation Operative time FavorstackFavorssuture 4-6 weekspostop. pain Sublay FavorstackFavorssuture Sajid MS. Hernia 2013;17:159-66

  7. Pain VAS (0 – 100) Wassenaar E. SurgEndosc 2010;24:1296-302

  8. Perioperative complications FavorstackFavorssuture Recurrence of hernia FavorstackFavorssuture Recurrence of hernia Sublay FavorstackFavorssuture Sajid MS. Hernia 2013;17:159-66

  9. Recurrence rates Reynvoet E. LangenbechsArchSurg 2014;399:55-63

  10. Baker JJ. Br J Surg 2018;105:37-47

  11. SUCRA values 12% 93% 43% 27% 73% Baker JJ. Br J Surg 2018;105:37-47

  12. Fixation Permanent Tackers Resorbable Laparoscopicrepair IPOM Sutures Glue

  13. Recurrence RCT RCT RCT Chronicpain RCT RCT Khan RMA. Int J Surg 2018;53:184-92

  14. P = 0.007 Christoffersen MW. Br J Surg 2015;102:541-7

  15. Incidencens of chronic (moderate or severe) pain: • 15.3% (abs. tacks) vs. 16.1% (non-abs. tacks) • Predictors of chronicpain • youngpts • herniarecurrence Christoffersen MW. Br J Surg 2015;102:541-7

  16. Tack vs. fibrinsealantfixation Eriksen JR. Br J Surg 2011;98:1537-45

  17. The mesh:defectarea ratio • r = 5 cm, R = 20 cm R2/r2 = 16 • r = 6 cm, R = 24 cm • r = 7 cm, R = 28 cm • r = 8 cm, R = 32 cm Resisting force/displacing force = ”Donut”area/defectarea = (πR2 – πr2)/ πr2 ≈ R2/ r2 Tulloh & de Beaux. Hernia 2016;20:893-5.

  18. The mesh:defectarea ratio Hauters P. SurgEndosc 2017;31:3656-63

  19. The mesh:defectarea ratio Hauters P. SurgEndosc 2017;31:3656-63

  20. Herniarecurrence and mesh:defect ratio Incidence of recurrence (%) Mesh:defect ratio Hauters P. SurgEndosc 2017;31:3656-63

  21. Herniarecurrence and overlap Incidence rate of recurrence Mesh overlap 95 articles, 111 study populations LeBlanc K. Hernia 2016;20:85-9

  22. Conclusions • Suturefixation vs. double crown tack: effectiveness, pain • Abs. tackfixation: recurrence rate  • No difference in painbetweenabs. and non-abs. tackfixation • Glue fixation: pain, recurrence • Mesh overlap: meshsize 4 times the herniadefect!!!

  23. Denmark Sweden

More Related