1 / 13

Report on the status of the „Restorative Justice Project” Melinda Gyökös 4 June 2009 Pilsen

Report on the status of the „Restorative Justice Project” Melinda Gyökös 4 June 2009 Pilsen. Project Objectives Project team & experts Timetable Conference Lessons learned. The Project „European best practices of Restorative Justice in the criminal procedure”

wyatt
Download Presentation

Report on the status of the „Restorative Justice Project” Melinda Gyökös 4 June 2009 Pilsen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Report on the status of the „Restorative Justice Project” Melinda Gyökös 4 June 2009 Pilsen

  2. Project Objectives Project team & experts Timetable Conference Lessonslearned

  3. The Project „European best practices of Restorative Justice in the criminal procedure” Proposed by Hungary (Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement - IRM) Included in the EUCPN WP by the decision of the Board (September 2007, Lisbon) Co-financed by the specific programme „Prevention of and Fight against Crime” 2007 of the European Commission  Project JLS/2007/ISEC/FPA/C1/033

  4. II. Objectives of the Project Collecting good practices of RJ applied in the MSs at any stage of the criminal proceeding & in crime prevention Systematizing good practices and identifying best practices based on comparative analysis Dissemination of good practices through publication (through the EUCPN website and hard copies as well)

  5. III. Project team & experts Project team  professional & financial management National Experts  provided data on RJ practices applied in the certain MS  presented RJ best practices at the conference  provide papers for the publication

  6. IV. Timetable January 2008 – March 2009  preliminary phase (collecting data, preparing the programme of the conference, finding speakers for the missing themes) 27-29 April 2009  conference in Budapest May – October 2009  preparing the publication

  7. V. Conference 27-29 April 2009 Participants 32 speakers of 16 MSs (AT, BE, CZ, DE, FI, GR, HU, IE, IT, NL, PO, RO, SE, SI, SK, UK) & Croatia representatives of 4 more MSs (EE, ES, FR, LV) representatives of the EUCPN (chair, research officer, some NRs), COM, European Forum for RJ 110 Hungarian participants

  8. V. Conference 27-29 April 2009 (cont.) Presentations 38 presentations in 5 plenary sessions & 11 workshops presentations on RJ practices applied in  crime prevention  pre-trial phase  during the trial during the implementation of sentences

  9. V. Conference 27-29 April 2009 (cont.) Presentations on RJ practices applied in crime prevention family group conferencing school/peer mediation social/community mediation (e.g. resolving minority/majority conflicts, post-war conflicts)

  10. V. Conference 27-29 April 2009 (cont.) Presentations on RJ practices applied in pre-trial phase & during the trial for juvenile offenders for adult offenders by serious crimes (e.g. domestic violence, sexual crime, hate crime)

  11. V. Conference 27-29 April 2009 (cont.) Presentations on RJ practices applied during the implementation of sentences prison mediation community/restorative prison projects restorative practices for prisoners before release

  12. Lessons learned there is place for institutionalizing RJ practices as part of the criminal procedure, but introducing them only for reasons of law harmonisation might lead to ambivalent results successful models applied in the criminal procedures of MSs where RJ practices are widely used outside the criminal justice system as well

  13. Many thanks for your kind attention! gyokosm@irm.gov.hu www.bunmegelozes.hu

More Related