1 / 21

Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka

Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the Department for Coordination of Operational Programmes Gdańsk, July 7 th 2011. Scope of the presentation. National performance reserve Cohesion policy after 2013 – focus on results. I.

wyome
Download Presentation

Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Instruments supporting effectiveness of the Cohesion Policy Karina Bedrunka Director of the Department for Coordination of Operational Programmes Gdańsk,July 7th 2011

  2. Scope of the presentation National performance reserve Cohesion policy after 2013 – focus on results

  3. I. National performance reserve

  4. Results of national performance reserve – Opolskie voivodeship (2008-2010) • 46 % - level of certification to EC • 99 % - level of contracting • 42 % - level of EFRD payments

  5. Additional funds for Opolskie voivodeship 1stPLACE IN POLAND – SUCCESS OF OPOLSKIE REGION EUR 58,027,035 in EUR 15% with regard to the original ROP OV 2007-2013 allocation

  6. Opolskie success factors • Directcontact of public administrationstaffwithbeneficiariesatthestage of project development and financial settlementinthe form of: • individualconsultation • trainingsessions/workshops • Project promoteratthestage of projectsubmission, approval and financial settlement Meetings of the Marshal of the Opolskie Voivodeship with businesses – introduction of simplifications Raising public administration's and businesses' awareness of joint goals and objectives

  7. Opolskie success factors, cont. Major commitment of the Board of the Opolskie Voivodeship to the implementation of ROP OV 2007-2013 Responsiveness to legislative changes (Team for environment protection) On-going financial and substantive monitoring of the Programme by the ROP OV 2007-2013 Managing Authority Promotion of ROP OV 2007-2013 – the Board of the Opolskie Voivodeship was recognized as the most trusted of all in Poland by the Ministry of Regional Development

  8. Opolskie success factors, cont. Qualifications Motivation Commitment

  9. Opolskie success factors, cont. Wisdom depends on three elements: personality, knowledge and self-control Antiphanes These three virtues create outstanding individuals who are capable of doing great things around them.

  10. Official gala to summarize the results of the contest for the National Performance Reserve under ROP OV 2007-2013 and Human Capital OP in the Opolskie Voivodeship Opole, February 25th2011

  11. II. Cohesion policy after 2013 – focus on results

  12. System of indicators – experience Financial perspective2004-2006 • Little experienceinprogrammingindicatorsatthe national and regionallevel • Excessively developed system, e.g. too many indicators • Under/over-estimated indicators • Imprecise indicator definitions Financial perspective2007-2013 Financial perspective2014-2020

  13. System of indicators for ROP OV 2007-2013 • 90 programme-specificindicators: • 24 quantitativeindicators • 66qualitativeindicators • Monitoring of indicator achievement in time: • monthly cycle • based on contracts signed and payment claims

  14. Evaluation of ROP OV 2007-2013 implementation

  15. Evaluation of ROP OV 2007-2013 implementation, cont. Evolution of the European Commission / country / region's approach from quantitative to qualitative Annual, periodicreport from the implementation of the programme

  16. Programming objectives for 2014-2020 – interconnection with indicators

  17. Project selection procedure Calls for proposals 2007-2013 COMPETITION ALLOCATION Calls for proposals 2014-2020 COMPETITION ALLOCATION RESULT TO BE ACHIEVED WITH REGARD TO STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE TOOL projectevaluationcloselyrelatedwithindicators

  18. National performance reserve? YES Financial perspective2007-2013 Financial perspective2014-2020 CRITERIA: Contracting (50%) II. Payments to beneficiaries (50%) CRITERIA: Evaluation of resultsachieved under specificstrategicobjectives(FUNDS SPENT VS. RESULTS OBTAINED) Payments to beneficiaries (50%)

  19. Proposals for implementation in the financial perspective 2014-2020 • STRATEGIC PROGRAMMING Concentration of funds on identified growth potentials Focus on the achievement of tangible objectives of operational programmes Specification of the criteria for the national performance reserve at the beginning of the programming period • MARKETING AT THE LEVEL OF THE EC / COUNTRY / REGION • RaisingstrategicapproachawarenessamongtheManaging Authority and thebeneficiariesconcerning: • increased role of indicatorsfromtheverybeginning of theprogramming period • specification of permissibledeviationsinthe non-performance of strategicobjective-relatedindicators(e.g. failure to achieveatleast 50% of indicatorsresultsin financial adjustments)

  20. Proposals for implementation in the financial perspective 2014-2020, cont. • HORIZONTAL GUIDELINES AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL - CONTINUATION Support areas limited to the Europe 2020 Strategy Limited number of project types Indicators linked with project assessment – rejection of projects due to the fact that they do not meet the criterion linked with indicators at the level of strategic objective

  21. Thank you for your attention

More Related