1 / 33

Socialization of the Institutional Repository: IR+

Socialization of the Institutional Repository: IR+. Suzanne Bell, UR Research Projects Coordinator Nathan Sarr, Senior Software Engineer. University of Rochester. Private university founded in 1850

Download Presentation

Socialization of the Institutional Repository: IR+

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Socialization of the Institutional Repository: IR+ Suzanne Bell, UR Research Projects Coordinator Nathan Sarr, Senior Software Engineer

  2. University of Rochester • Private university founded in 1850 • Includes The College, Eastman School of Music, Warner School of Education, Simon School of Business and the Medical Center • 5000 undergrads and 4300 grad students • Carnegie Level I research university • Institutional repository: UR Research, est. 2003

  3. The repository needs to… • Become part of the users’ normal workflow • Be part of the research process • Support collaboration • Make publishing into the repository easy • Focus on the user as an individual and provide positive feedback • Give users control over their work

  4. User workspace - private Researcher pages - public Institutional repository – generally public

  5. IR+ provides… • Personal Workspace • Your files, organized your way • Share files • Track versions • Researcher Pages to showcase work • Easy “Publishing” into the IR • Stats: at many levels

  6. Datasets and IR+ • System is format agnostic • Information from ICPSR: average size of their datasets is 39 MB • Too big to email back and forth • Not too big to up-/download from the web • Share and collaborate using IR+

  7. Keep that metadata clean! • IR+ has a person name authority system • Uses control lists as much as possible for metadata entry • Makes possible a number of interesting information displays

  8. Enough Powerpoint… IR+ - let’s go Live

  9. Suggested Readings • Bell, Michael. (2009) IR+ A New Repository to Meet User Needs. Presentation at CNI 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/8841 • Foster, Nancy Fried and Susan Gibbons. (2005) Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories. D-Lib Magazine 11(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html Also available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/1292 • Foster, Nancy Fried and David Lindahl. (2008). Enhancing E-Resources by Studying Users: The University of Rochester's Analysis of Faculty Perspectives on an Institutional Repository. Preprint of book chapter available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1802/5888 • Lindahl, David et al. (2007) Institutional Repositories, Policies, and Disruption. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/3865 • Randall, Ryan et al. The Next Generation of Academics: A Report on a Study Conducted at the University of Rochester. http://hdl.handle.net/1802/6053 • Witt, M. (2009). Institutional Repositories and Research Data Curation in a Distributed Environment. Library Trends, 57(2). Available from: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=lib_research

  10. Thank you for this opportunity! More information: http://irplus.orghttps://urresearch.rochester.edu Email: sbell@library.rochester.edu OR nsarr@library.rochester.edu

  11. IR+ - Summing Up • Make use of the repository part of the researchers’ normal workflow • Share, showcase, control • Easy-to-use option for medium-sized datasets • Controlled approach to metadatasystem generated Contributor, Sponsor pages

More Related