50 likes | 150 Views
TMT Instrument Development Cartoon. David Silva Observatory Scientist 3 November 2006. Constraints & Assumptions. Constraints = Board mandates No new money until 2012 Total available new money = 200 M$ (2006) Not certain that all new money will be available for instruments
E N D
TMT Instrument Development Cartoon David SilvaObservatory Scientist 3 November 2006 TMT.OPS.PRE.06.011.DRF01
Constraints & Assumptions • Constraints = Board mandates • No new money until 2012 • Total available new money = 200 M$ (2006) • Not certain that all new money will be available for instruments • No more than 20 M$ per year • Assumptions = mutable • First two instruments + NFIRAOS + LGSF from Construction • AM2 not included anywhere • Eight years from preliminary SAC discussion to AIV/Comm • No more than one new start per year • No more than one commissioning cycle per year • Unit cost: 25 M$ TMT.OPS.PRE.06.011.DRF01
Cartoon Model – I AIV/Com years highlightedIDO = Instrument Development OfficeFirst two instruments from Construction TMT.OPS.PRE.06.011.DRF01
Cartoon Model – II Integrated: 175 M$ TMT.OPS.PRE.06.011.DRF01
Discussion • Support NFIRAOS + LGSF investment • Range of possibilities, range of cost (10 M$ – 50 M$ per thing) • Need Instrument Development Roadmap • SRD vision update • Framework for science case for construction proposal(s) • Framework to attract “instrument donors” and “instrument associates” • Must commit to First Suite this year • Needed for coherent Construction proposals • The roadmap cannot be cast in stone… • Not necessary (or desirable) to lock-in exact future sequence now • Need to be sensitive to developments in astrophysics and technology • Roadmap should be reviewed and revised annual by SAC TMT.OPS.PRE.06.011.DRF01