1 / 9

Runway Safety Teams: an ANSP’s experience

Runway Safety Teams: an ANSP’s experience. A brief history. 2004 - 2006 In line with the LRST Recommendation contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions, ENAV laid down a solid foundation upon which LRSTs could be established in all airports. 2007

xanti
Download Presentation

Runway Safety Teams: an ANSP’s experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Runway Safety Teams: an ANSP’s experience

  2. A briefhistory • 2004 - 2006 • In line with the LRST Recommendation contained in the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions, ENAV laid down a solid foundation upon which LRSTs could be established in all airports. • 2007 • All ENAV Airports have a Local Runway Safety Team in place. • 2008 • ENAC – ItalianCivilAviation Authority – AirportRegulation No. 30 – • Local Runway Safety Teams become mandatory in all Italian Airports. ATC Global 2012

  3. LocalRunwaySafetyTeams in Italy • Accordingto APT 30: • Mainreferences: Eurocontrol EAPPRI and ESARR2, ICAO DOC 9870, FAA RwySafetyBlueprint • LRST is under the authority/coordination of the Airport Operator as part of its Safety Committee • The adopteddefinitionofRwyIncursionis: “Anyoccurence at anaerodromeinvolving the incorrectpresenceofanaircraft, vehicle or person on the protected area of a surfacedesignatedfor the landing and take off ofaircraft” • Members: Airport Operator, ANSP, Airlines and all other airport organizations that are involved in Runway Safety Operations ATC Global 2012

  4. LocalRunwaySafetyTeams in Italy • Classification of Rwy Incursions: • SeriousIncident • Major Incident • SignificantIncident • No SafetyEffect • NotDetermined ATC Global 2012

  5. LocalRunwaySafetyTeams in Italy • ProactiveActivities: • Verificationof Ground MouvementProcedures, Markings and Signs • Elaborationof the Local Hot Spot Map • Monitoring of the adopted phraseology of the Airport Operators (i.e. vehicledrivers) • Verification and Validation of the training plan for the Manoeuvring Area Driving Licences • ReactiveActivities: • Analysis and evaluationofanyRunwaySafetyOccurenceaccordingto the adoptedclassification • HazardIdentification and RiskAssessmentaccordingto the RunwaySafetyProgram • Proposals for Mouvement and the prevention of Runway Incursions ATC Global 2012

  6. 1. Case Study - Bologna LRST • Incursions at RHP A main causes: • Unfamiliarity with the layout • Pilot expectation of a closer RHP to the runway • Distraction during taxiing. • Counter-measures developed: • Improve situational awareness of pilots and ATCOs • Local awareness campaign for all pilots, ATCOs and airlines • Hot -spot map published in AIP and provided directly to pilots • ATC clearance normally issued before taxiing to decrease head-down ATC Global 2012

  7. 2. Case Study - Milan Malpensa LRST ATC Ops Language Phraseology Weather Construction Pavement markings Aerodrome signs Aerodrome layout Vehicle procedures Aerodrome lighting Aerodrome docs Permanent WG for Analytic Listening of Frequencies Rt Phraseology mistakes have been drastically reduced from 20% to 3% ATC Global 2012

  8. OurRecent National RunwaySafety Story RunwayIncursions Trend ATC Global 2012

  9. ThankyouverymuchforyourkindattentionMauro Iannucciwww.enav.itwww.enavserices.com ATC Global 2012

More Related