1 / 22

Stem cell mobilisation and collection in Glasgow including the use of plerixafor

Stem cell mobilisation and collection in Glasgow including the use of plerixafor. Joy Sinclair Nurse Manager Clinical Apheresis Unit SNBTS, Glasgow. Background on the Clinical Apheresis Service in Glasgow. Department set up in the early 1990’s Specifically for apheresis procedures

xaviera
Download Presentation

Stem cell mobilisation and collection in Glasgow including the use of plerixafor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stem cell mobilisation and collection in Glasgow including the use of plerixaforStem cell mobilisation and collection in Glasgow including the use of plerixafor Joy Sinclair Nurse Manager Clinical Apheresis Unit SNBTS, Glasgow

  2. Background on the Clinical Apheresis Servicein Glasgow Department set up in the early 1990’s Specifically for apheresis procedures Performed 1500 procedures 2010- 2011 Peripatetic Service Currently 6 members of nursing staff

  3. Background on the Clinical Apheresis Servicein Glasgow 1100 Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Procedures (TPE) Around 400 mobile procedures 160 Extra Corporeal Photopheresis (ECP) 20 Red Blood Cell Exchange (RBCX) 175 Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection (HPC-A) 150 Autologous 25 Allogeneic Use COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia

  4. Objectives • Timing of mobilisation • Plerixafor • Planned use • Rescue • The Collection • Procedural considerations • COBE Spectra • Spectra Optia

  5. No weekend processing facility In an unusual situation we can collect on a Sunday Chart based on historical departmental data Shared with 50 referring haematologists throughout West of Scotland Encouraged to contact CAU to confirm dates Patient Appointment Biggest challenge - paediatrics Timing of Mobilisation Tuesday

  6. Mechanism of Action – G-CSF • Haematopoietic stem cells are held in the bone marrow by using the chemokine receptor CXCR4 to look for/ identify a “homing” signal from the chemokine SDF1 (Stromal Derived Factor). • They are also “tethered” to osteoblasts (bone progenitor cells) by cell adhesion proteins such as VCAM. • GCSF stimulates the production of neutrophils in the bone marrow, which in turn increases the number of WBCs in the blood. However, as part of this process the bone marrow can get packed out with neutrophils. • Neutrophils naturally produce protease enzymes including elastase. At high levels these can break down SDF1 (which is a small protein) and therefore reduce the “homing” signal for stem cells. Neutrophil proteases can also break down cell adhesion proteins like VCAM and release stem cells from their normal “tethers”. • With the lack of SDF1 and breakdown of VCAM, the stem cells will come out of quiescence in the bone marrow and migrate into the blood giving us the opportunity of collecting them on a cell separator.

  7. Mechanism of Action - Plerixafor • Plerixafor has a different mechanism of action in that it directly works at the CXCR4 receptorby blocking it. The stem cells therefore do not have the ability to detect the presence of SDF1 and will again come out of quiescence and migrate into the blood giving the opportunity to collect them on a cell separator • Evidence at the moment suggests plerixafor works well combined with G-CSF.

  8. Plerixafor - Approval • Scottish Medicines Consortium approval for plerixafor • Approval of plerixafor by the SMC allows the drug to be prescribed routinely by NHS Scotland for its licensed indications on the advice of an Oncologist or Haematologist • Approved in combination with G-CSF for PBSC mobilisation for Myeloma or lymphoma patients whose cells mobilised poorly • This allows the drug to be used on a remobilisation basis and on an immediate rescue basis

  9. Plerixafor- Planned re-mobilisation • Wait 4 weeks to allow the patient’s marrow to recover • Re-mobilise patient with G-CSF 10 micrograms/kg/day for 4 days & plerixafor on evening of day 4 • Apheresis morning of day 5 • Repeat G-CSF, plerixafor and apheresis daily until enough cells are collected

  10. Plerixafor - Planned re-mobilisation • Avoid weekend procedures by planning day 1 G-CSF on a Friday. First dose plerixafor will be due on Monday which will give 4 days available to collect PBSC • Plerixafor can be given as an out-patient in the late evening (9.30 pm). Well-motivated patients may safely self-administer. • Timing of collection is important: guidance from Genzyme in plerixafor package insert suggests starting apheresis 11 hours post-dose. (Our practice is to start at 9 am, 11-12 hours post dose) • Consider large volume apheresis • Don’t wait on peripheral CD34+ count

  11. Advantages Timing for apheresis is predictable Successful for most patients with a average of 2 doses of plerixafor Time to organise and plan both for the staff and patient Disadvantages Delay in collecting the cells PBSC on a high WCC so product is more cellular leading to high cryopreservation volumes and more DMSO Theoretical danger of hyperleucocytosis Probably less cost effective than ‘immediate-rescue’ use Plerixafor - Planned re-mobilisation

  12. Plerixafor - Immediate-rescue • Patient receives mobilising chemotherapy as planned • WCC and peripheral CD34 count check on predicted day of mobilisation • If neutrophils are recovered but CD34 count low plerixafor can be given that evening • G-CSF given at 7am the following morning • Apheresis commenced at 9 am • GCSF, plerixafor and apheresis repeated daily until patient has enough cells

  13. Advantages Cost effective. Some patients predicted to mobilise poorly may do OK by conventional means No need for the patient to come back and go through the ‘pre-collection process’ again No transplant delay for the patient Fewer plerixafor doses required to achieve transplantable cell dose in our experience (1.4 doses) The collection is usually done on a lower WCC so less cryopreservation issues Disadvantages Plerixafor toxicities maybe higher if added to pre exisiting toxicities of chemo esp. GI toxicities Not as predictable for apheresis scheduling Potential problem with ideal collection time over the weekend Logistics for staff and patients organising process at the last minute (ordering, prescription, late night injection, early morning G-CSF and apheresis) It’s a great deal of information for the patients with little time to digest Plerixafor - Immediate-rescue

  14. Plerixafor - Approved Protocol • We have an approved protocol for plerixafor use in the West of Scotland • This allows re-mobilisation with plerixafor for myeloma and lymphoma patients. • It also allows immediate rescue if the patient meets certain criteria

  15. PlerixaforCriteria for Immediate-Rescue • Must be a definite date for transplant • Must be no more than 1 day before anticipated date of first mobilisation • Total WBC on first plerixafor day must be at least 4.0 x 109/l but less than 20 x109/l • Peripheral CD34 count must be less than 15 per ml • Patient must be infection free There is some published evidence that giving plerixafor in patients with WBC above 20 also works

  16. PlerixaforCollection Considerations • Change in goal posts now looking for minimum transplant dose (Glasgow 2.5 x 106 kg) but higher doses may be possible • Consider collecting the patients stem cells 11 hours post plerixafor without waiting for a CD34 count. • Consider a large volume apheresis to work towards achieving transplant dose (3xTBV) • Ensure good venous access • Consider if second dose of plerixafor required or if G-CSF may be enough

  17. The Collection • We use both Spectra Optia and Cobe Spectra for collection • Cobe Spectra • Data over 5 years 500 procedures • Efficiency is 50% (CE2) • Spectra Optia • Data over 1 year – 100 procedures • Efficiency is 55% (CE2)

  18. Procedural considerationsGeneral • Consider a large volume apheresis to work towards achieving transplant dose (3xTBV) • Consider a high flow procedure to process more cells per minute • Remember increasing flow rate will increase AC infusion rate to the patient. • Consider using IV calcium gluconate/chloride • Consider increasing AC ratio. This allows you to process faster but with the same AC infusion rate to the patient (max 15:1)

  19. Procedural considerationsCobe Spectra • Spectra - consider increasing the collect flow to 1.1 or 1.2 if WBC count above 40 (calculation tool on CaridianBCT web site) • Spectra – consider collecting at 3.5 – 5% Hct. This maximises mononuclear cell collection but also will increase RBC and granulocyte contamination

  20. Procedural considerationsSpectra Optia • Optia collects a purer product than Spectra and eliminates problematic high cryopreservation volumes seen with Spectra collections on high WBC count’s. • This is particularly useful for patients mobilised with plerixafor where high WBC levels are likely.

  21. Procedural considerationsSpectra Optia • Optimization guide from CaridianBCT • Set default value of the chamber chase to 4 mls • Aim for 750-1250ml inlet volume processed per chamber • WBC > 20 start or change to a collection preference (CP) of 20 • WBC < 10 start or change to a collection preference (CP) of 60 • Consider use of inlet Volume control

  22. In summary • Glasgow annual Autologous HPC-A procedure numbers are between 150 – 200 • Until 2008 10-15% failure rate in mobilisation • Since 2008 with the introduction of plerixafor we have had a 100% success rate in collecting a transplantable dose • Average of 1.5 procedures to collect a transplantable dose (Min 2.5 CD34 x 106, Max 6 CD34 x 106) • Consideration should be given to optimizing the collection tailored to individual situations • Spectra Optia is as efficient if not more efficient than Cobe Spectra

More Related