1 / 12

Phase 5: survey results

Phase 5: survey results. SWIC Partnership College Health PTR Project March 28, 2011. Level of agreement that the PTR solution w ill improve the Program of Study (n=5). Level of agreement with sustaining the PTR solution (n=5). Level of agreement with extending PTR to other POS (n=5).

xia
Download Presentation

Phase 5: survey results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phase 5: survey results SWIC Partnership College Health PTR Project March 28, 2011

  2. Level of agreement that the PTR solution will improve the Program of Study (n=5)

  3. Level of agreement with sustaining the PTR solution (n=5)

  4. Level of agreement with extending PTR to other POS (n=5)

  5. Level of Confidence in PTR (n=5)

  6. Level of Confidence that PTR Process will be used with other POS (n=5)

  7. Open-ended comments about sustaining the PTR solution(s): • The team is committed, with support of the college • Don’t know how realistic it is – “other deans would have to come on board with own ideas and VP and President would have to commit resources and money”

  8. Open-ended comments about using PTR with other Programs of Study: • Other programs with technical education and the business division have expressed interest • Leaders will meet in April to determine what POS will be the focus of PTR in FY12

  9. Greatest Challenges to Sustaining PTR solution(s): • Making sure the solution and continued re-assessment is incorporated with procedure/policy and “getting buy-in from all stakeholders” (2 respondents mention stakeholder buy-in) • Funding • Finding the right fit. Process needs to be explained and sold. Hiring freeze means people are doing more with less. • Maintaining a strong communication connection between the high school counselors and SWIC personnel. Keeping part-time SWIC counselors informed.

  10. Greatest Challenges to Extending PTR to Other Programs of Study: • Division will not be involved unless POS is in own division • Content and intent of our PTR process may not be compatible with other POS • Money, time and personnel are all in short supply. New projects will be very challenging to launch • Funding at both the secondary and postsecondary levels • Buy-in from other potential stakeholders

  11. Respondents (5): PTR Team Member 80% Partner 20% Number meetings attended (5): 1-3 20% 4-6 60% More than 6 20%

  12. Contact information for OCCRL: • Stacy Bennett – e-mail: bennetts@illinois.edu • Debra Bragg – e-mail: dbragg@illinois.edu • OCCRL – e-mail: occrl@illinois.edu • PH: 217-244-9390 • Website: occrl.illinois.edu • PTR website: occrl.illinois.edu/projects/PTR

More Related