1 / 24

Society of American Military Engineers

Society of American Military Engineers. FY2012 Department of Energy Programs Michael A. Peek, P.E., CCE, CFM Office of Engineering & Construction Management (OECM) September 22, 2011 Army Navy Club. DOE Organization. $11.8B Budget (NNSA) Nuclear non-proliferation

xylia
Download Presentation

Society of American Military Engineers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Society of American Military Engineers FY2012 Department of Energy Programs Michael A. Peek, P.E., CCE, CFM Office of Engineering & Construction Management (OECM) September 22, 2011 Army Navy Club

  2. DOE Organization • $11.8B Budget (NNSA) • Nuclear non-proliferation • Nuclear weapons stewardship • $6.1B Budget (EM) • Demo, remediation and restoration • $.2B Budget (LM) • Long-term stewardship • $4.8B Budget • Nuclear Energy(NE) • Fossil Energy (FE) • Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy (EERE) • Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability (OE) • $5.4B Budget (SC) • Advanced scientific computing • Basic energy sciences • Fusion energy • High energy physics • Nuclear physics • Biological & environmental research

  3. Major DOELaboratories & Field Facilities • .

  4. Office of Engineering and Construction Management (OECM) • Project Management (PM) and Real Property Management Policy, Guidance and Oversight • Validate project performance baseline (scope, cost and schedule) before Congressional Budget Request: Projects with a Total Project Cost (*TPC) ≥$100M • Conduct External Independent Review (EIRs) • Conduct Independent Cost Reviews/Estimates (ICRs/ICEs) • Monitor Project Performance on behalf of Deputy Secretary • All Projects with a TPC ≥$10M • Oversee DOE Earned Value Management System Certification * Total Project Cost = Design + Construction + Other Direct Costs

  5. PM Differences: DOE vs. DOD • Program vs. Project • Bundling (DOE) vs. De-Bundling (DOD) • Major Items of Equipment, “MIE” (e.g., Linear Accelerator Systems vs. Aircraft Trainers) • In Project (DOE) vs. Out of Project (DOD) • Incremental Funding (DOE) vs. Full Funding (DOD) • Cost Contracting (DOE) vs. Firm Fixed Price (DOD) • M&O (Management and Operations) Interface vs. Government

  6. FY12 Congressional Budget Requestby Program ($M)

  7. Project Portfolio Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission Need Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline Critical Decision 3 – Start Construction Critical Decision 4 – Project Completion/Transition to Operations

  8. In Planning (CD-0) Critical Decision 0 – Approve Mission Need Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range

  9. In Planning (CD-1) Critical Decision 1 – Selection of Alternative and Cost Range Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

  10. Project Portfolio (Post CD-2 ) Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline Critical Decision 3 – Start Construction

  11. In Design (Post CD-2) Critical Decision 2 – Approve Performance Baseline

  12. Under Construction (Post CD-3) Critical Decision 3 – Approve Start of Construction

  13. Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) @ Hanford, WA

  14. WTP Construction

  15. Mixed Oxide Facility @ Savannah River Site, SC

  16. MOX Construction

  17. National Synchrotron Light Source II Site Plan NSLS-II CFN NSLS

  18. NSLS II Construction NSLS II NSLS

  19. K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning K-33 K-31 K-25 K-27

  20. K-25 Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decontamination and Decommissioning

  21. Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Scope Upgrade magnets and power supplies • Upgrade is designed to build on existing facility: • vast majority of accelerator and experimental equipment have continued use CHL-2 Scope of the proposed project includes: - Doubling the accelerator beam energy - New experimental hall & beamline - Upgrades to existing 3 experimental halls Enhance capabilities in existing Halls

  22. Thomas Jefferson Lab:12 GeV Upgrade Site Area New Experimental Hall & Beamline Present Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility (CEBAF) East Arc D CHL-2 South Linac North Linac Injector West Arc A C B

  23. Questions?

  24. Project Management Process“Acquisition Management System” with Critical Decision (CD) Milestones Independent Review (OECM EIR >$100M ) to Validate PB OECM EIR for Major System (>$750M) Projects Request PED Funds PED Funds Operating Funds Construction Funds Operating Funds Initiation Definition Execution Closeout TPC CD-2 Approve Performance Baseline (PB) CD-0 Approve Mission Need CD-1 Approve Alternative Selection and Cost Range CD-3 Approve Start of Construction or Execution CD-4 Approve Start of Operations or Project Completion Critical Decision Projects Report Earned Value ≥ $20M PARS II Reporting for Projects ≥ $10M

More Related