1 / 15

Society of American Military Engineers Northern Virginia Chapter

Society of American Military Engineers Northern Virginia Chapter. Lloyd C. Caldwell, P.E., SES  Director, Military Programs 25 April 2013. Agenda. Overview and Missions MILCON & Environmental Programs Overview Strategic Context and Direction Project Delivery

lefty
Download Presentation

Society of American Military Engineers Northern Virginia Chapter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Society of American Military Engineers Northern Virginia Chapter Lloyd C. Caldwell, P.E., SES  Director, Military Programs 25 April 2013

  2. Agenda • Overview and Missions • MILCON & Environmental Programs Overview • Strategic Context and Direction • Project Delivery • USACE Support to DoD Energy Programs • FY13 Military Construction Contracting Forecast

  3. USACE Overview • USACE provides value for the Nation and diverse stakeholders. • Across the globe, we deliver positive impacts for today and tomorrow - in construction, natural resource management, energy and sustainability and capacity building, disaster response, contingency support, and more. • We deliver services in partnership with industry based on historically strong collaborative and innovative working relationships.

  4. USACE Military Missions • Military Construction • Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) • COCOM Support • Installation Support • Environmental • Real Estate Services • Interagency and • International Services • Energy and Sustainability FORSCOM HQ, Fort Bragg, NC FOB Leatherneck, Afghanistan National Geospatial Center, FT Belvoir, VA USAG Humphries High School (DODEA) School and Cyclone Shelter, Bangladesh 2012 Kabul Road, Bagram, Afghanistan

  5. Military Missions Program TrendsFY00-16 Program ($Millions) As of 19 Apr 13

  6. MILCON OVERVIEW MILCON FY 13 & Prior Total Program 219 projects / $6.5B EOY Execution Projection 194 projects / $5.9B Army – 86 projects / $2.6B Air Force – 16 projects / $388M DOD – 71 projects / $2.8B ECIP – 21 projects / $76M MILCON FY14 President’s Budget - 126 Projects / $4.0B Army – 41 projects / $1.2B (MCA, MCAR, AFHC, AFHI) Air Force – 29 projects /$577M (MCAF, MAFR, FHAF) DOD – 47 projects / $2.2B (DODM, DODS, DLA, MCN, MCDA, MDAM, NSA,SOF) ECIP – 9 projects / $40M

  7. NWD 21/$720M Military ConstructionDivision and District Boundaries(FY14 President’s Budget) NAD 21/$925M Alaska LRD 19/$608M Seattle SPD 24/$431M North Atlantic Portland Northwestern New York Chicago Sacramento Omaha Cincinnati Baltimore Great Lakes & Ohio River South Pacific San Francisco Norfolk Kansas City POD 12/$551M Louisville Little Rock Los Angeles Albuquerque Tulsa Atlanta Southwestern South Atlantic Honolulu Savannah Pacific Ocean SAD 19/$380M Ft. Worth Mobile Dallas Districts Outside the US: Europe (Germany) Far East (Korea) Japan LEGEND: Div./Regional HQ location District HQ location Division boundary District boundary State boundary TAD 1/$45M SWD 9/$374M Other Special Assignments: Huntsville Engr & Spt Center (Chemdemil) TAC-Winchester (Africa, Bosnia, Mid East) St Louis District - Archaeology Philadelphia District-Brokered MILCON Mobile District (Panama, Puerto Rico, etc) # Projects/Funding

  8. NWD $259M FY14 Environmental Programs($1.3B) NAD $305M Alaska LRD $78M Seattle SPD $146M North Atlantic Portland Northwestern New York Chicago Sacramento Omaha Cincinnati Baltimore Great Lakes & Ohio River South Pacific San Francisco Norfolk POD $129M Kansas City Louisville Little Rock Los Angeles Albuquerque Tulsa Atlanta Southwestern South Atlantic Honolulu Savannah Pacific Ocean SAD $130M Ft. Worth Mobile Dallas Districts Outside the US: Europe (Germany) Far East (Korea) Japan LEGEND: Div./Regional HQ location District HQ location Division boundary District boundary State boundary MVD $25M SWD $150M HNC $130M

  9. What is Changing and Where are We going?

  10. Strategic Context • Transformation • BRAC05 and Realignment • Grow the Army Army Facility Strategy 2020 Spans full Facilities Life Cycle; MILCON last resort New Construction Centric 1.005B Current GSF Real Property End Strength Mil Missions Strategic Focus • Continued Streamlining of Process • Integration of technical capabilities across facilities life cycle enabling smart capital investment decisions of the Installation Management Community MILCON Transformation Timely Delivery of Surge Construction Funding 10

  11. WHERE ARE WE GOING? Integrated, technical capabilities across the full facilities life cycle providing solutions to complex engineering & construction problems Sustainment and R&M Planning Construction Fit-Out

  12. Principal Acquisition Methods Design-Bid Build Design-Build Adapt-Build (for Army Standard Facilities) Standard Facilities Acquisition via geographic districts Centers of Standardization responsible for Army Standards/Criteria, maintaining Standard Designs, and Adapt-Build Models Developing regional models (based on climate zone) and updating standard designs for energy. Trends Less reliance on MATOCs for Military Construction; more stand-alone contracts* Reemphasizing use of 2-step procurement process for Design-Build (ensure sufficient design development in RFP for 1-step procurements) Other Services developing facilities standardization programs. Interest in more centralized management of Restoration and Modernization Programs *Use of MATOCs will continue for more specialized work and when procurement time is limited (eg. end of FY installation support Project Delivery Trends 12

  13. USACE Support to DoD Energy Program • Achieving savings 5-10 percent better on average over EPAct 2005 levels • Strive to meet Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA 2007) by designing energy efficient facilities using current industry standards that promote life-cycle cost (LCC) effective energy efficient measures • Renewable energy sources integrated into projects when LCC effective • Seeking opportunities to immerse new technologies LEED Certification – Level Silver Army is developing Energy Use Intensity (EUI) targets for standard facilities to establish a baseline that ties directly into the Army’s metering system (MDMS) Intent is total accountability, designer , builder and operator

  14. Installation Energy & Sustainability • USACE Adds Value… • Support Net-Zero Initiative (energy, water and waste, 18 Installations) • Life Cycle Approach (planning, design, construction, commissioning, operation, sustainment and disposal) • Sustainment Restoration and Modernization (SRM), deep energy cuts, up to 50 percent • Support planning and execution of alternative financing strategies • Energy Savings Performance Contracts • Utility Energy Saving Contracts • Power Purchase Agreements • Enhanced Use Leases • Regional Energy Centers of Expertise (knowledge creation and sharing)

  15. Support to DoD and the Nation- Today and Tomorrow • Support the Combatant Commands’ security activities and the efforts of other U.S. government agencies around the globe to advance our Nation’s interests. • Partner with the Installation Management Community at all echelons to deliver and maintain enduring installations and contingency basing • Support the Nation and the Army in achieving energy security and sustainability goals

More Related