80 likes | 159 Views
Comments from NWSHQ Perspective. Need to produce table showing 68 baseline & option products vs products that PG is working on What is link between PG and AWG? AWIPS-II – CIs need to become recognized as official developers (similar to OAR/GSD, NWS/OHD) PG interaction with NWS operations
E N D
Comments from NWSHQ Perspective • Need to produce table showing 68 baseline & option products vs products that PG is working on • What is link between PG and AWG? • AWIPS-II – CIs need to become recognized as official developers (similar to OAR/GSD, NWS/OHD) • PG interaction with NWS operations • Need to have a liaison located at WFO or NCEP Center (like done now at SPC) • Could cover multiple WFOs • Liaison associated with CIRA could reside in Boulder or Cheyenne WFO and also spend time in surrounding WFOs (Pueblo, Grand Junction, Salt Lake City) • Liaison associated with CIMSS could reside in Milwaukee WFO and also spend time in surrounding WFOs (LaCrosse, Chicago, Green Bay) • Liaison associated with SPoRT (at Huntsville WFO) could also spend time in surrounding WFOs (Mobile, Jackson, Birmingham, Nashville, Peachtree City) • Liaison with NHC (associated with CIRA) could also spend time in FL WFOs
Proving Ground Products and Activities vs GOES-R 68 F&PS Products
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization, (H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization May 18, 2009 3
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization, (H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization May 18, 2009 4
GOES-R Baseline Products (C) Characterization, (H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization May 18, 2009 5
GOES-R Option 2 Products(C) Characterization, (H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization May 18, 2009 6
GOES-R Option 2 Products (C) Characterization, (H) HES Artifact, (L) Clarity, (S) Standardization May 18, 2009 7
GOES-R Other Proving Ground Efforts May 18, 2009 8