450 likes | 609 Views
Design Goals & Design Methods. staffan.bjork@chalmers.se. Today’s Lecture. Evolved & Designed Goals Design Goals Design Methods Will mention methods from book but no give detail from (chapters 6-11,14) Expect that you read this Needed for assignment 3 Assignment 3
E N D
Design Goals & Design Methods staffan.bjork@chalmers.se
Today’s Lecture • Evolved & Designed Goals • Design Goals • Design Methods • Will mention methods from book but no give detail from (chapters 6-11,14) • Expect that you read this • Needed for assignment 3 • Assignment 3 • Note that the low-fidelity playtest is in effect a part of assignment 3 • First supervision time today 15.00-17.00
Evolved & Designed Games • Evolved Games • Games that have no documented original design • Many anonymous designers • Variant rule sets • Rule sets maintained through organizations or manufacturers • Designed Games • Identified designer • Often commercial intent • Original rule set
Example evolved games - Bowling • Egyptian Tombs • 5200 BC or 500 BC • Monasteries • Metaphorical teaching tools in monasteries and church where the pins represented heathens • Medieval Europe • Use in English courts gave rise to the concept of king-pin • United States • Banned in the 19th century due to betting • Nine-Pin Bowling changed into today’s Tin-Pin Bowling [another example Chess] Sources: Brasch, R., How Did Sports Begin?, Tynron Press, 1986 Levison, D. & Christensen, K. (eds.), Encyclopedia of World Sports – From Ancient Times to the Present, Oxford University Press, 1999.
Example designed Games - Basketball • James A. Naismith, 1891 • Design criteria • enjoyable by average people • skill rather than strength or weight • ball easy to handle, difficult to conceal • no tackling [another example Landlord]
Differences and Similarities between Evolved and Designed Games • Differences • Serendipitous Design – Planned Design • Gradual improvement - Original idea • Improvised Gameplay - Intended Gameplay • Similarities • Same general structures • The games in both categories are all games… • Can be analyzed same way to look at gameplay • Claims to be in one category can be wrong
Differences between design and craftwork • Knowledge transferal • Crafts are primarily learned by imitation • Practitioners can not motivate why one does things one way • Unintentional trial-and-error experiments develop methods over periods spanning centuries • Information about designs are only recorded in the produced artifact • Fragmented information about details and patterns are used to recreate the design
Differences between design and craftwork, cont. • Crafts do not work with sketches • Experiments are done on the product itself • Full-scale experiments • Craft typically making variants of previous work • Design goalsmore static • Design goals can be implicit
Areas of responsibilities for designers • Identify and explore critical choices • Relate costs for research and cost for erroneous decisions • Plan activities in the work process in relation to the competences in the work group • Identify information sources and their reliability • Explore connections between the “product” and the environment in which it should be used • Explore and satisfy the “needs” of the users
Types of design goals • Goals related to pre-planned gameplay experiences • Stressing, competing, group effort, etc. • Types of fun according Marc LeBlanc • Goals related to the Game system • Be something for players to explore and master • Be a vehicle used to provide engrossment in gameplay or narrative • Be a tool for gamers to create or choose their own gameplay experience • Be a tool for gamers to make their own games • Goal related to Diegetic Presentation or Narratives • Tell a story of character development • Tell a story of player progress • Create a believable/compelling/interesting fictional world • External Goal • Serious Games
Design goals can be seen as answers to questions • Questions that need to be answered to be able to start design work • Help structure one’s work • What should be changed? • Why should it be changed? • When should the change be completed? • Who are the stakeholders? • (How should it be changed?)
Questions that need to be answered during the design process • Why is it hard to answer these questions? (why cannot we answer the before the design starts?) • One must use available information to predict a future that will not occur unless the predictions are correct • The effect must be determined before the possibilities to reach them are – the designer must work backwards from an assumed effect to the causes that can “cause the effects” • Sequences of cause and effect make it highly likely that new problems or better goals appear • Shifting or changing the design goal(s) • Possibly forcing the design process to be restarted
Stakeholders • Distributors • Products – boxed packages • Services – mediums • IP holders • Companies • Actors, authors, artists • Producers • Project managers • Programmers, artists, level designers, animators, sound artists, … • Subcontractors • Players • Expert players • Novice players • Fan communities • Relatives • Interest organizations • Legaslators • The designers
The Design Space of Games • All possible game designs can be said to describe a design space • Defining design goals can be seen as defining a subspaces where the actual game design should be located • Previous design goals can be seen as external design goals – not based on what is interesting in the space • Design goals regarding gameplay can be seen as defining a subspace on areas that are interesting in relation to other areas
Ways of Creating Subspaces of the Design Space • Specifying required characteristics • Specifying forbidden characteristics • Note that this does not have to be seen as a negative way of design • Creativity requires limitations
Ways of Creating Subspaces of the Design Space, cont. • Gameplay • Game Design Patterns, Game Mechanics • Theme • Humor, horror, political • Style • Realistic, Sequential Art • Narrative • Linear, hypertext, player-created, etc.
Jones’ model of the design process • Divergence • Find alternatives • Transformation • Refine and understand alternatives • Convergence • choose alternative through selection or synthesis • Exact method depends on field, context, available resources and input Not methods – Ideas and concepts
Divergence • Properties • Unclear goals • Problem area vaguely defined • Evaluation not relevant • Starts from a assignment or requirement specification • Conscious goal to broaden design group’s sphere of ideas • Identify important stakeholders
Transformation • Properties • Find pattern from a number of alternatives • Choosing goals • Defining outer boundaries of problem and design space • Identify critical variables • Identify subproblems
Convergence • Properties • Focus on reach a goal • Endurance and methodic work • Evaluate alternatives to choose which alternative to realize • Two categories • Top-down • Bottom-up • Both can be used simultaneously
Game Design Workshop & Jones’ model • Jones’ model can be applied to explain overall design process • Divergence • Conceptualization - Chapter 6 • Transformation • Prototyping - Chapter 7 • Digital Prototyping - Chapter 8 • Playtesting - Chapter 9 • Convergence • Functionality, Completeness, and Balance - Chapter 10 • Fun and Accessibility – Chapter 11 • But can also be described as narrowing the design space
Jones’ model applied to Conceptualization • Divergence • Brainstorming • List creation, Idea cards, Shout it out, Stream of consciousness, Randomize it, Research, Extreme measures • Teamstorming • Interaction relabelling, cultural probes • Transformation • Editing & refining • Convergence • Focus on formal elements
Conceptualization - Divergence • Functional roles • observational, basic, dedicated, unique, supporting, meta • Social roles • banned, outcast, recluse, motivator, negotiator, mediator, helper, violator, dominator, exhibitionist • Atomic gameplay actions • Take OBJECT from POSITION, Place OBJECTS on POSITION, Give OBJECT to PLAYER/NON-PLAYER, Find OBJECT, Perform SKILL BASED ACTION, Randomize, Compute EVALUATION FUNCTION, Select OPTION from SET OF OPTIONS, Order PLAYER to perform TASK
Conceptualization - Transformation • Guidelines • support interruptability • allow multiple communication channels • consider ambiguity • design for external events • allow modes of play based on social roles • minimize social weight • analyze intended player groups from several perspectives • Design experiments
a b c d e t f s g r h q i p j o n m l k Conceptualization - Convergence
Jones’ model applied to Prototyping • Physical & software prototypes • Divergence • Consider mediums to use • Paper, software, moddable engine • Consider components to use • Transformation • Test mediums • Test components • Convergence • Integrate components into system
Prototyping – Divergence • Identify technologies • Identify information structures • Identify interaction structures
Jones’ model applied to Playtesting • Self-testing, playtesting with confidants, playtesting with target audience • Divergence • Find gameplay problems, emergent features • Freeform, specific tasks, secondary tasks • Transformation • Analyze problems and emergent features • Convergence • Decide to try and keep or remove identified features
Jones’ model applied to Functionality, Completeness, and Balance • Divergence • Find issues of functionality, internal completeness, balance, fun, and accessibility • Transformation • Explore issues and compare against each other • Convergence • Select issues & solutions to address
Assignment 3 • Task • Design a game for a specific game genre • Groups of 3-4 • Report • Design document • Use component framework (lecture 3) • Not mechanically; critically and only relevant parts • Note how the game concept differs from existing games • Include theme, setting, and narrative elements • Interface Design and how players should learn the game • Process description • Clearly state your design goals • What methods did you plan to use? Why? • Define and describe plan before starting! • What methods were used and how did they work? • Conceptualization - Chapter 6 • Prototyping - Chapter 7 • Digital Prototyping – Chapter 8 • Play testing - Chapter 9 • Functionality, Completeness, and Balance – Chapter 10