170 likes | 346 Views
Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components. Disruption cases: Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms) VDE (P1 to P5 plasma center translation) and quench fast quench at P5 (1 ms) slow quench at P5 (40 ms - slow VDE in Titus’ case) worst case?.
E N D
Disruption Analysis of PP, VV, and Components • Disruption cases: • Mid plane fast disruption (1 ms) • VDE (P1 to P5 plasma center translation) and quench • fast quench at P5 (1 ms) • slow quench at P5 (40 ms - slow VDE in Titus’ case) • worst case? Model includes bracket conducting path on back of PPs
Skin Depth at Fast Disruption Electrical conductivity and skin depth (1ms disruption) Background fields at center of lower PPPs (1.2, 0.72, -0.8) m The skin depth of copper passive plates is only ~2-2.5 mm during 1 ms plasma disruption Fast mid-plane centered disruption 2 MA/ms Back ground field OH, TF and PF coils (#79)
Eddy Current - Mid-plane Fast Disruption arrow – eddy current flow color – eddy current density
Eddy Current – P1-P5 VDE and Fast Disruption arrow – eddy current flow color – eddy current density
Eddy Current in Front Face of PPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption skin depth Eddy current at end of disruption
Eddy Current in Front Face of PPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption skin depth No loop is observed Eddy current at end of disruption
Eddy Current in Back Face of PPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption Eddy current at end of disruption
Eddy Current in Back Face of PPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption Eddy current at end of disruption
Total Toroidal Current Induced during Fast Disruption Background fields at center of lower PPPs (1.2, 0.72, -0.8) m Center of lower PPPs
Disruption Loads on PPPs – Mid-plane Fast Disruption Moment center of lower PPPs
Disruption Loads on PPPs – P1-P5 VDE then Fast Disruption Moment center of lower PPPs
Disruption Loads on PPPs – P1-P5 Slow VDE (40 ms Disruption) Moment center of lower PPPs