200 likes | 470 Views
Culture and Relationships. Theory & Research in Intercultural Communication—COM 372 John R. Baldwin—Illinois State University. A systems explanation. A systems explanation. Output: Stability Satisfaction Family adjustment Increased society tolerance “Third” (family/rel) culture”. Input:
E N D
Culture and Relationships Theory & Research in Intercultural Communication—COM 372 John R. Baldwin—Illinois State University
A systems explanation Output: Stability Satisfaction Family adjustment Increased society tolerance “Third” (family/rel) culture” Input: Motives/Goals Definitions of relationship Cultures of origin Cultural values, communication Family cultures • Process (Throughput): • Communication patterns: • Conflict • Self-disclosure • Power negotiation, etc.
More on Systems Approach • System • Environment • Open/closed systems • Input/Throughput/Output • Homeostasis/Dynamic Equilibrium • Feedback • Positive: Change the system! • Negative: Keep the system the same! • First/Second-order system change! • The problem may not be that there is no feedback but that the rules the system is following do not work! Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose…
Input:Questions • What are some “input” factors that might impact intercultural, intergroup, or other sorts of relationships? • How might the input factors change between: • International couples • Intergroup couples (religious, ethnicity, etc.) • Stigmatized couples
Input: Motives • Lampe (1981, 1982): • What are the main reasons that people date interethnically? • What are the main reasons people do not? • Do people date & marry for the same reasons? (Brazil example)
Process: Issues (Markoff, 1977) • Problems in communication (verbal, NV differences) • Difference in values • The concept of marriage (e.g., Char, Collier) • Individual behavior and practices (not cultural) • Prejudices and stereotypes (yes, even in marriage!) • The surrounding family (distance --> greater success!)
Process Issues • What are some “process” issues intercultural couples might face? • What leads (IC) relationships to develop? • What are some ways IC couples might resolve cultural differences?
Process: Issues (Graham, Moeai, & Shizuru, 1985) • The Romeo & Juliet Effect • “Internal” versus “External” problems • individual living habits • interference with extended family • children • different cultural customs • time with friends • language difficulties • financial problems
Process: IR Dating/Marriage • Are the issues the same in interracial dating and marriage as in “intercultural” dating and marriage? • What about “interfaith” marriage?
Process: Solutions Tseng’s 5 Patterns of ICM Adjustment • One-Way Adjustment: One partner gives in to the culture of the other • Alternative Adjustment: The couple alternates between cultural • Simultaneous Adjustment: Elements of both cultures are adopted at the same time. • Mixing: Within a given culture or time, the couple uses aspects of one culture or the other. Tseng uses an example like "enchiladas tonight, sushi tomorrow night." = Compromise (as opposed to submission, consensus, or obliteration). • Creative Adjustment: The couple adopts elements of neither culture, but finds their "own" way
Intercultural Relationships • Some explanations of relational growth • Propinquity: Shared spaces interaction potential • Similarity-Attraction Hypothesis: It’s similarity that makes relationships grow • URT: No…it’s your ability to predict and explain the other or (AUM) to reduce your anxiety • Social Penetration Theory: : Self-disclosure • Depth & breadth of SD • 4 stages of relationships • Dialectical approach: Tensions… • Turning points: Key moments…
Evaluating a theory • Does it make sense with everyday life? (e.g., by working through a single example) • Are there enough counterexamples to expand the theory? • Does it fit prior research? • Does it meet goals of type of theory? • How does it address theory evaluation standards? • How does it compare to other theories?
Theory evaluation standards • Scope, boundaries: How broad is it? Is what it covers clear? • Logical consistency: Does it hold together well? • Parsimony: Is it appropriately simple? • Testability (if scientific): Can the propositions be measured and tested? • Predictive ability (if scientific): Can we make good predictions with the variables provided? • Heurism: Does it lead to new study or theory? Does it stand the “test of time”? • Explanatory power: Does it explain most cases, or are there classes of cases it does not explain? • Utility: Is it useful in everyday life?
Anxiety-Uncertainty Management • Background: URT • Concepts: • Stranger • Anxiety and Uncertainty (not =!) • Effectiveness (and adaptation) • Mindfulness vs. Scripts • Thresholds • Management
AUM: Refining the structure • A list of variables • Knowledge, Motivation, Skills • Hofstede’s Dimensions • Current structure • Proximal factors • Distal (secondary) factors • Order and direction of influence
AUM • Application: My Big Fat Greek Wedding • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcAL5ljKvqE (3.57) • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6mAAky_5og (3.25) • Evaluation:
International Marriaegs in Japan (Quasha & Quasha, 2012) • Method • Concepts specific to Japanese relationships? • What are some specific aspects of the relationships the authors describe that illustrate the role of culture in relationship? • What are some other specific aspects of relationships you recall from the readings?