1 / 13

Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) Chapter 5 Authors: DiClemente , Salazar, Crosby

Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) Chapter 5 Authors: DiClemente , Salazar, Crosby. Powerpoint by: Rebecca Amantia H571. Overview. Introduction of PMT History Components of PMT Example Applied in Public Health Two Public Health examples. PMT Introduction. Communication Theory

Download Presentation

Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) Chapter 5 Authors: DiClemente , Salazar, Crosby

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Protection Motivation Theory (PMT)Chapter 5Authors: DiClemente, Salazar, Crosby Powerpoint by: Rebecca Amantia H571

  2. Overview • Introduction of PMT • History • Components of PMT • Example • Applied in Public Health • Two Public Health examples

  3. PMT Introduction • Communication Theory • To better understand the specific cognitive process underlying how fear appeals motivate people to change their behavior. • Perceived threat + Cognitive processes. • Analysis of rewards and costs for engaging in either a maladaptive behavior or adaptive response. • Designing messages for health awareness campaigns that utilize fear as a motivator for positive behavior. • Ex: Antismoking advertisements. .

  4. History of PMT • Fear Prior • Fear was an emotional trigger for trial-and –error type responses in an attempt to escape the experience of fear. • Dr. R. W. Rogers in 1975 • to explain the cognitive effects of fear appeals. • Lazarus & Leventhal • Fear triggers an automatic appraisal. • Differ in Sensitivity & Vulnerability, Interactions & Reactions. • Danger Control & Fear Control • 1st three factors of PMT: Threat Severity, Threat Vulnerability, & Response Efficacy • PMT known as today • Include self efficacy and emphasize cognitive processes, which motivates either adaptive or maladaptive behavioral responses.

  5. Components of PMT The Threat Appraisal & the Coping Appraisal are in close proximity to Protection Motivation Threat appraisal Severity Vulnerability Protection Motivation Rewards of Maladaptive response Fear appeal Coping appraisal Response Efficacy Self-Efficacy Costs of Adaptive response Protection Motivation: A mediating variable whose function is to direct protective health behavior.

  6. THREAT APPRAISAL: Severity & Vulnerability • Assessment of the seriousness of a health threat. • Estimating Vulnerability (Probability of a negative outcome) • Severity of the negative outcome if no action is taken. Protection Motivation Severity Vulnerability Fear appeal Rewards of Maladaptive response Threat appraisal

  7. THREAT APPRAISAL: Rewards • Rewards are positive consequences for a maladaptive behavioral response. Protection Motivation Rewards of Maladaptive response Fear appeal Threat appraisal Severity Vulnerability

  8. COPING APPRAISAL: Response & Self Efficacy • Response Efficacy • Evaluation of how effective the behavior will be in protecting the individual from harm. • Self Efficacy • The individuals evaluation of their capacity to perform the recommended behavior. Protection Motivation Response Efficacy Self-Efficacy Coping appraisal Costs of Adaptive response Fear appeal

  9. COPING APPRAISAL: Cost • Costs • involves physical, social, or psychological consequences for engaging in the adaptive response. Costs of Adaptive response Protection Motivation Response Efficacy Self-Efficacy Coping appraisal Fear appeal

  10. EXAMPLE • Health Threat: alcohol poisoning • Vulnerability: Probability of alcohol poisoning if one continues to drink too much. • Severity: Mortality or Morbidity of alcohol poisoning. • Response Efficacy : will drinking less prevent alcohol poisoning. • Self-Efficacy: Individuals evaluation of their ability to limit their drinks or quit. • Rewards of Maladaptive Response: Rewards of continuing to heavily drink (being cool or popular) • Cost of Adaptive Response: Cost to drinking less (not being cool or being made fun of)

  11. PMT Applied • Useful to health communication • reducing alcohol use, enhancing healthy lifestyles, enhancing diagnostic health behaviors and preventing disease. • Utilized to discover which part of message design has the greatest impact on message efficacy. • Successful health awareness message using fear appeal.

  12. Example: Anti-smoking commercial • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zWB4dLYChM • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eUOjSTZMIE

  13. Thank You!

More Related